English prosody
This article possibly contains original research. (December 2024) |
Prosody is important in English. It conveys many pragmatic functions relating to speech acts, attitude, turn-taking, topic structure, information structure and more. It also helps mark lexical identity, grammatical structure, semantic elements, and more.
The component features of English prosody – pitch, loudness, duration, voice qualities, and so on – are the same as those of other languages. However the ways that these combine and the meanings of those combinations are often unique to English.
Lexical and syntactic prosody
[edit]Each English word has an associated stress pattern:[1] each syllable is stressed or unstressed. Unstressed syllables are generally lower in pitch, quieter, shorter, and phonetically reduced, with the vowels near to schwa.[spelling?] Many languages mark syllable stress and its absence with some of these features, but rely on them to different extents; others lack stress of this kind entirely.
For any given word, the citation-form stress pattern is fixed. While the stress patterns of English words do not reliably follow general rules, there are some tendencies. For example, most English names have stress on the first syllable, as in Jennifer, most long nouns tend to have stress on the antepenultimate (third-from-last) syllable, as in comMUnicate. The location of stress in words formed by compounding is generally governed by the stress properties of the specific affixes involved, for example the -ization of nationaliZAtion and the -ic of proSOdic.
In English, such stress patterns carry relatively little functional load, especially in contrast to tone languages, such as Mandarin. That is, there are few word pairs which are phonetically identical but distinguished by prosody alone, with CONduct/conDUCT being one of the rare examples. Nevertheless, correct positioning of stress is an important part of the language and greatly helps listeners to identify the words intended.[2]
In ongoing speech, the lexical stress patterns can be affected by the neighboring words and by syntactic and semantic structures. For example, green house and greenhouse differ in that the second word loses stress in the latter, and generally this type of semantic combination exhibits this prosodic pattern. There are many ways that prosody marks how words combine into phrases, often marked primarily at the phrase boundaries.
Pragmatic prosody
[edit]While the aspects discussed above can be seen in monologue speech, the prosody of dialog is much richer. The ultimate purposes of dialog – suggesting, persuading, building rapport, enjoying each other's company, comparing perspectives, making plans, and so on – are typically accomplished in part through the use of various prosodic patterns. This is a characteristic of English: it uses prosody to convey many pragmatic functions which other languages convey lexically.[3][4]
Sometimes these are conveyed mostly through pitch, in the so-called intonation contours. For example, the Contradiction Contour,[5] as in an instance of No, I never voted for Richard Nixon said to correct a misconception, consists of a region of narrow pitch that is bookended by two pitch excursions, here most likely on the first syllables of the words never and Nixon.
More often, the prosody of pragmatic functions involves combinations of multiple features: not only pitch, but also loudness, duration, timing, phonetic reduction, and voice qualities such as creaky and breathy voice. For example, the prosody of "awww", when used as an exclamation of praise for a cute baby, involves creaky nasal voice, high pitch that is generally flat except with small initial and final peaks, relatively loud volume, and extended duration.
The importance of non-pitch features can be seen in two uses of pitch downsteps.[6] In one, the Minor-Third Pattern, the downstep in pitch, prototypically about three semitones, is accompanied by lengthening, flatness of pitch, harmonicity, and other features.[7] This combination serves purposes such ascuing and calling people, as when calling someone to dinner with dinner time!. Another construction also involves pitch downstep, but this one typically involves also nasality, low volume, and other features, and its function is to mark apologies as sincere.
Paralinguistic and emotional prosody
[edit]In English, as in all languages, prosody is also used in conveying emotions.[8] Some emotion-prosody mappings are nearly universal in nature, such as the expressions of pain, and others more language-specific, such the expressions of envy or remorse. Sociolinguistically, English prosody varies significantly across dialects, and prosody is important in constructing social identities, including gender identies and social roles. Prosody is also important in indicating personality and intersectional properties, such as charisma,[9] and in other paralinguistic functions.
Applications
[edit]Overall the study of prosody has lagged other areas of linguistics. Within the study of English prosody, topics other than read speech and intonation have lagged. In any case, no comprehensive and complete description of English prosody is as yet available,[10] which makes prosody a challenge for both learners and teachers of English.
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ Kreidler, Charles W. (2008). The pronunciation of English: A course book. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 74–96. ISBN 0-631-16219-4.
- ^ Field, John (2005). "Intelligibility and the listener: The role of lexical stress". TESOL Quarterly. 39 (3): 417–418. doi:10.2307/3588487.
- ^ Ogden, Richard (2010). An Introduction to English Phonetics, 2nd Edition. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 42–57. ISBN 978-1-4744-1176-9.
- ^ Reed 2010, pp. 1–22, 30–218.
- ^ Hedberg, Nancy; Sosa, Juan M.; Fadden, Lorna (2003). The intonation of contradictions in American English (PDF). Prosody and Pragmatics Conference. pp. 1–3.
- ^ Niebuhr, Oliver (2015). "Stepped Intonation contours: A new field of complexity". In Skarnitzl, Radek; Niebuhr, Oliver (eds.). Tackling the Complexity of Speech. Prague: Charles University Press. pp. 43–45.
- ^ Day-O’Connell, Jeremy (2012). "Speech, song, and the minor third: An acoustic study of the stylized interjection". Music Perception. 30 (5): 450. doi:10.1525/mp.2013.30.5.441.
- ^ Cole, Jennifer (2014). "Prosody in context: a review". Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. 30: 13–15. doi:10.1080/23273798.2014.963130.
- ^ Oliver Niebuhr; Radek Skarnitzl (2019). Measuring a speaker's acoustic correlates of pitch – but which? A contrastive analysis for perceived speaker charisma. 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. pp. 1776–1777.
- ^ Reed 2010, p. 219.
References
[edit]- Reed, Beatrice Szczepek (2010). Analysing Conversation: An Introduction to Prosody. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-230-22345-5.