This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Is there a way to edit the table, so that it looks like the table from this article ---> 73rd Academy Awards? The last row (Best Visual Effects) looks better if it takes up only "one block" ... and does not "extend to the right", over to the "next block". In other words, the final rows should consist of two blocks (Best Visual Effects and just an empty block). I think this looks aesthetically better than one long extended block, which is out of sync with the rest of the chart. As I said, an example is here ---> 73rd Academy Awards. But, I was not able to figure out how to manipulate the chart correctly. Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 20:35, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There are a lot of photos to the right. These "force" a lot of blank white space, due to the tables/charts below. Why not put all the photos in a "photo gallery" at the bottom of the article? (Similar to this page: Angels in art). Just an idea. Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 14:29, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That way, we can put as many photos as we want. And we don't have to limit the number, due to any concern for resulting white space (as the Comment Note in the "editing view" indicates). Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 14:34, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Due to the odd number of award categories, they don't neatly fit into the two columns per row. The current format of the final row for this page is the following:
It's been argued that the latter format places undue weight on the category by implying that it's more significant, but it also been stated that the former is inconsistent with the other Academy Award ceremonies pages. Which format should be used?2601:249:9301:D570:899A:E22B:2167:7F2C (talk) 19:55, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I’m sorry, I can’t see who disputed your edits? Spanning the row across two columns is the best solution and it’s not clear that there is any disagreement. It’s for this reason that discussion should generally take place before an RfC (per WP:RFCBEFORE). I’m going to cancel the RfC for now, and a new one can be started if discussion here cannot resolve to a clear consensus. — HTGS (talk)20:56, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And to reiterate: I support the double-wide cell at the bottom, and as no one reverted your edit, you would be fine to reinstate it yourself. Joseph A. Spadaro proposed it above and made the change above in 2021, and I can’t quickly see when that was undone.
If there is a neat way to instead make the Best Picture cell double-wide then I would prefer that, but I think it would throw off all the other cells being neatly arranged, so probably not ideal. — HTGS (talk)21:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved