Talk:Radio New Zealand

New Zealand High‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Radio Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Radio New Zealand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061116024949/http://www.soundarchives.co.nz/ to http://www.soundarchives.co.nz/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:17, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rename

I am a regular Radio New Zealand listener and visitor to their website and social media accounts. I noticed that their content refers to the organisation as "RNZ" and rarely uses the name "Radio New Zealand." I am proposing renaming the article RNZ and turning the Radio New Zealand namespace into a redirect page. RNZ seems to be following a similar trend as other media organisations such as TVNZ, ABC News, ABC News (Australia), NPR, PBS and BBC. Wanted to get feedback before I go ahead. Andykatib (talk) 22:43, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is it a fairly recent change? I don't listen all that often to them, but I've never heard other people refer to them as RNZ - it's always been Radio New Zealand. In comparison, almost almost everyone refers to Television New Zealand as TVNZ. I'd suggest waiting a while to see if it is commonly used outside the organisation before moving it. 2001:4530:2:E07:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFD (talk) 00:28, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that RNZ is the more common, but I don’t think it’s quite at the same level as the other orgs you listed, except maybe NPR. I don’t think that it quite passes the litmus test of being definitely more recognisable as the acronym. Of course guidance at: Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Abbreviations#Acronyms in page titles and Wikipedia:Article titles#Article title format. — HTGS (talk) 04:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 14 December 2024

It has been proposed in this section that Radio New Zealand be renamed and moved to RNZ.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Radio New Zealand → RNZ – RNZ calls itself "RNZ" on its website and YouTube channel.

The media usually calls it "RNZ". Examples:[1][2][3] None of these sources even call it "Radio New Zealand". ―Panamitsu (talk) 00:15, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per MOS:ACROTITLE: “In general, if readers somewhat familiar with the subject are likely to only recognise the name by its acronym, then the acronym should be used as a title.” The threshold here is not merely which version is more common. It’s easiest to understand with something like BBC, where you can imagine surveying people and finding a significant portion of the population struggle to remember what the C stands for. With our radio station here, all listeners will understand both, but naïve readers (think Americans) who don’t know the subject will understand it better/quicker if it’s spelled out. — HTGS (talk) 08:16, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]