Jump to content

Talk:White-tailed jay/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 06:02, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


  • I am loving all these bird articles.
  • Link nape to birdgloss.
    • Done
  • Personal preference, but I think "genus Cyanocorax" sounds better than "Cyanocorax genus".
    • Done
  • Why no link for de Sparre in the lead?
    • Added
  • We use IOC as WP's bird taxonomy, so the IOC list would be a better ref for it being monotypic and its placement in Cyanocorax.
    • Changed
  • No etymology for mystacalis?
    • The closest I can find is this, where it says it's Latin for moustache. It's referencing a different species, what are your thoughts on using this source for that?
  • "Some measurements are known from only one individual, who had a wing length" "One individual measured has a wing length"
    • Changed
  • "than its relatives in the Cyanocrax genus" to "than other species in its genus"
    • Changed
  • "preferring open areas" to "as it prefers open areas"
    • Changed
  • "down through El Oro and Loja" I don't think "down through" is appropriate here, since the range is disjunct.
    • Reworded
  • "It lives at elevations as high as down to sea level" Reads weirdly.
    • Reworded, not sure I like it any better though, so happy to hear any suggestions!
  • "steal eggs" Just say feeds on eggs instead.
    • Changed
  • "alone, apart from other white-tailed jays" Does this mean that they're far from other white-tailed jays, or that they are alone except for other white-tailed jays?
    • Away from other white-tailed jays - I've changed the wording.
  • Seems pretty comprehensive, did find this report of probable predation by a hawk that could be added.
    • Added, I put it in Diet and feeding, but if you think it's better elsewhere I'm happy to move it.
  • Scientific names in ref titles should be italicized.
    • Fixed
  • Book titles should be in title case.
    • Fixed
  • Spot-checked with BOW and some of the other references, all of them are reliable and verify claims made.
  • That's all I have, nice work. AryKun (talk) 19:35, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm passing for now, but note that the IOC World Bird List cites v14.1 and links to a 2020 archive link; make sure to update the archive link to a recent one that actually shows v14.1 later. AryKun (talk) 03:11, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed