Template:Did you know nominations/Haliey Welch

Haliey Welch

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that Haliey Welch earned more than $65,000 within weeks of Hawk tuah going viral?

• Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/conormurray/2024/06/28/hawk-tuah-meme-explained-how-woman-in-viral-interview-made-a-reported-65000-and-prompted-tiktok-craze/

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/hawk-tuah-girl-merch-viral-video-1235047145/

• • Reviewed:
  • Comment: I accidentally made the page on the 11th without realizing that it was not appropriate to do so given the move discussion on the Hawk tuah page, but the discussion has now been closed with strong support for an article about Welch being created.

Converted from a redirect by Jolielover (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

jolielover♥talk 09:18, 14 December 2024 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing:
• Neutral:
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing: - n

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Article is new enough and long enough. I'm seeing the definition of pump and dump is verbatim from the source, which gives concerns about other close paraphrasing potentially in the article. Please review and attempt to better paraphrase the materials.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:19, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

That definition was already in the pump and dump article, so I took it out myself.--Launchballer 23:55, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

• @Crisco 1492: I have removed that bit due to the definition not being needed, please check to see if the article is fine now. jolielover♥talk 15:17, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
  • Hi Jolielover, have you gone over your writing to ensure that there is no close paraphrasing? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:51, 18 December 2024 (UTC)