User talk:Arorapriyansh333

Teresa Teng

Hi Arorapriyansh333, I have reverted the editor and placed a notice on their page stating they need to start a discussion on the talk page so hopefully they will do so. Please see WP:CONTENTDISPUTE for other options available. S0091 (talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! I am a regular contributor of this article. Arorapriyansh333 (talk) 17:44, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

I suspected you may be one the regular IPs there. I honestly have no clue what the correct answer is for that article but I have seen the edit war going on for a while now and it is disruptive. It's way past time for editors to engage in a discussion to gain consensus. S0091 (talk) 18:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Yes it's definitely me. When this article was created she was called Taiwanese singer. But recently since few months some started editing and calling her Chinese singer without providing any reliable source to back she was Chinese by nationality. Millions of ppl visit wiki to get the info about anything they want therefore it should have true and complete info about the personality so that everyone could know who is she and what she did. I just hope this disruption stop as soon as possible and we find some solution! Arorapriyansh333 (talk) 20:17, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

To be clear, the disruption is from both sides, regardless of who is right. Please see WP:EW. Someone needs to start a discussion on the talk page and invite the other to participate. That is first step. S0091 (talk) 22:56, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Yes surely I hope they do. Arorapriyansh333 (talk) 04:56, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Hua Mulan article

Stop your edit warring on the Hua Mulan article. Mulan is fictional. You keep removing that without any explanation. The article is in numerous fiction related categories. There is a section in the talk page also discussing the fact that she is a fictional character. -TrynaMakeADollar (talk) 10:01, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Hello, I'm ChunnuBhai. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. ChunnuBhai (talk) 18:35, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Is there no other map? Plz remove the map. Arorapriyansh333 (talk) 18:45, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Arorapriyansh333, you can create a map and upload. But vandalising the article like this is not correctChunnuBhai (talk) 18:46, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Arorapriyansh333! Your additions to Teresa Teng have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:06, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Ok so which part I have copy righted content? I think I am well aware of that. Though i accept i've used some of direct content from the sources but I've also used my own words in directing it. And if there is I will try re-write it if possible. Arorapriyansh333 (talk) 18:53, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Bruce Lee

Regarding your recent edits to Bruce Lee (Special:Diff/1002434204, Special:Diff/1002434373). You may wish to note that Hong Kong was not part of the People's Republic of China by any standard during Lee's lifetime (except that it was claimed), and that you may wish to undo your edits. 1.64.46.31 (talk) 17:13, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

Your edit to Teresa Teng has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. You restored the exact same text that TheresNoTime removed. Please completely rewrite whatever you have added so it complies with the copyright policy. It is also not allowed to link sites that contain piracy links and that are copyright violations themselves. Sennecaster (Chat) 20:49, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

What you refering to? Which text? You can remove the text or phrase that has been copied but why removing the entire edit for it? Arorapriyansh333 (talk) 03:46, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

October 2021

Thank you for contributing to the article Teresa Teng. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you.

I want to remind you not to use unreliable sources.I will not list which websites are reliable or unreliable.But if you want to add references that I think are unreliable, you must prove that they are reliable. The point is to make me think they are reliable. I found that you have recently added read01.com or have tried to add globaltimes.cn in the past. Rastinition (talk) 12:02, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Also remind you not to use youtube or some websites similar to youtube as references.--Rastinition (talk) 12:10, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

How do you know they are unreliable sources? Ent. Sina is reliable sources. AParchive is a reliable sources. And you don't even know how to make an edit.. See what you did in legacy section. How I believe you? And you are not even a confirmed user. Arorapriyansh333 (talk) 14:13, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

You can explain why the reference is reliable, but you are not even a confirmed user is not a good explanation.In addition, part of the judgment is based on the discussion at zh.wikipedia.org. But sometimes there are some errors when I delete the content.You can fix those errors. Rastinition (talk) 14:21, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

You have to first explain how you think it's unreliable before I explain to you how it's reliable. They are from official chinese sources. Like Ent.Sina But I'll confirm with another user about those you removed. Arorapriyansh333 (talk) 14:28, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

1. Most PRC websites copy each other’s content, even official websites. sina.com and 163.com often have this problem.

2. Part of the website like read01.com is a content farm.

3. Many PRC websites have both 1 and 2.

4. Sina has many domains, some domains are not suitable for reference, like blog.sina.com . Rastinition (talk) 14:40, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Blog. Sina is unreliable... Even sohu has the same. But both www.sohu is usually official source and blog. Sohu is used when someone is expressing his I Opinion. I never added those source. Also i'll confirm confirm with another user then make any change Arorapriyansh333 (talk) 14:43, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

After reading your earlier edit.I found out that I deleted a magazine(lifeweek.com), thank you for correcting this error....... Rastinition (talk) 14:52, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

List me the sources you removed. I can't find them. I did deep research and posted it. I'm refering to one related to Light exquisite feeling in career section. Also i'll be grateful if you help to find the reliable sources that are left empty. Thank you!

Hello! I'd like to tell you that those sources you had doubt upon have been verified as reliable sources by another more experienced user. I've talked to him on this topic and he confirmed it. Arorapriyansh333 (talk) 06:23, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

1.Copy from zh:Wikipedia:可靠来源/常见有争议来源列表 .And you can read WP:SPS.

壹讀12020年壹讀已因內容農場問題而被列入MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist，該來源的特定連結只有列入MediaWiki:Spam-whitelist才能使用。同時編者一致認為該來源並不可靠，缺乏可信度。1

Translation: In 2020, read01 was listed in MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist due to the content farm issue. The specific link of this source can only be used if it is listed in MediaWiki:Spam-whitelist. At the same time, the editors agree that the source is unreliable and lacks credibility

2.And you can read WP:BLOGS. I don’t think it’s good for you to add a website whose URL contains BLOG.

Anyone can create a personal web page, self-publish a book, or claim to be an expert. That is why self-published material such as books, patents, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, personal or group blogs (as distinguished from newsblogs, above), content farms, Internet forum postings, and social media postings are largely not acceptable as sources. Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established subject-matter expert, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable, independent publications.^[8] Exercise caution when using such sources: if the information in question is suitable for inclusion, someone else will probably have published it in independent reliable sources.^[9] Never use self-published sources as third-party sources about living people, even if the author is an expert, well-known professional researcher, or writer.

3.If the source uses wiki or other like youtube as reference, you can read WP:CIRC .

4.Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources I think it is better for you to use other references instead of chinadaily.com. But I will not delete chinadaily.com until there are other references to replace, at least, Teng had asthma throughout her adult life only has chinadaily.com as a reference for now.

5.I have noticed that you mainly use sohu and sina, I suggest you use news.sohu.com or news.sina.com when you want to use blog.sohu.com .At least you won’t worry about WP:BLOGS.

I have also noticed a problem. The reference number 62 107 110 111 112 uses the same reference..., the problem may be more serious than what I have noticed now.

Rastinition (talk) 08:08, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

You should go to my talk page and see my conversation. I have discussed this topic before. Zt.blog.sohu although is blog but is still a good source as it has complete detail of information of everything. I won't call it unreliable. If it was unreliable, it would have been already removed. You shouldn't have deleted that. It was the best source for the said content. Arorapriyansh333 (talk) 10:08, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Any personal blogger cannot put such information. I think you should re-add the source. I agree with read01 anyway. Thanks for info. Arorapriyansh333 (talk) 10:14, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

I will check what you said after I finish what I'm currently doing. I think it may take several hours.If you think you wait too long, you can do it by yourself. Rastinition (talk) 10:25, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

You just removed Time magazine and reliable publication related to Steve Tsang. I appreciate your work but do not make mistakes like this. I'll re-add the source zt.blog.sohu you look forward later and tell me. I personally do not regard it unreliable. Arorapriyansh333 (talk) 10:39, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

See [1].

https://www.indiatvnews.com/buzz/news-google-doodle-celebrates-65th-birth-anniversary-of-taiwanese-singer-teresa-teng-424806 and https://time.com/5122428/teresa-teng-taiwan-google-doodle/ they have the same content, you can make one stay. If you think the time.com is better than indiatvnews.com, then leave the time.com.indiatvnews.com will delet. Rastinition (talk) 10:49, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

They do not have the same content. India tv do not talks about revolutionary songs. Alk three are important for the content. Arorapriyansh333 (talk) 11:00, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

I checked it again, you are right, it seems that the picture is the same.By the way,I think you can consider using <ref name=""> Rastinition (talk) 11:07, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

PS:I found out that I have been working on the WIKI for more than 2 hours, so I went to rest.At least I'm tired.--Rastinition (talk) 11:20, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

No prob! Look i've checked this following source. http://zt.blog.sohu.com/s2010/201038gongshi/ Below the page if you go you'll find its written "editor in charge : Li Yafei and Yang Jing". Also the page nowhere mention its a personal blog. It seems reliable in my opinion. Such info cannot be given by some blogger including the number of votes with ranking figure. You check yourself and tell. Arorapriyansh333 (talk) 12:40, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

I suggest you post to WP:teahouse. Rastinition (talk) 15:13, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Bodhidharma, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 09:15, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

June 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Jolin Tsai, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. If you said "pop" and "popular" are almost same, why do u insist on changing the original "popular" to "pop"? your words don't make sense to everyone. Also, who said news from Sohu are poor reference and have no credibility?? There are a lot of Wikipedia articles use Sohu's news as sources. Please stop your disruptive edits and stop defending your fandom by destroying other artists' Wikiepdia articles. Leehsiao (talk) 20:50, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

I very well know about wiki policy. I think you should first read what wiki policy says about editing where anybody is free to edit and contribute the page. You continue disrupting edit of every other user. And that page is full of unreliable source but you still think what you doing is good. You want everything to be in your own way. Yule.sohu is quite poor source. Same with 163.com... all third class sources. news.sohu would be more better. And reference says 'pop'. If you think they are same, why do you keep changing it? Stop making excuse that of defending the fandom. I'm defending reliability and that's my job.. If you provide quality sources, i'd have no prob. There are almost no sources that says she is among the most influential figures in Chinese pop culture except tatler Asia. Arorapriyansh333 (talk) 03:03, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

@Arorapriyansh333: I think I don't need someone who has been blocked from editing before to teach me how to edit Wikipedia articles. If your edits make sense and looks good, you're welcome. But if you keeps doing those edits doesn't make sense, I won't let you go. There is no Wikipedia policy points out those sources are not reliable, those are basically entertainment news site of huge Chinese media companies, how come you think those are unreliable? and how unreliable could them be? Those're not about politics, ok? I didn't say "popular" and "pop" are same, you said it. If she was not one of the most influential figures in Chinese-language popular culture, then how many people else could be, considering popularity, recognition, album sales, concert tickets sales, awards, fashion trend setting, and number of other artists' rendition of her songs? Do you really have much knowledge about the C-pop industry? Now is not your Teresa Teng's era.----Leehsiao (talk) 03:23, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

You seem to be hardcore Jolin Tsai fan. I didn't even name Teresa Teng anywhere and neither i'm a fan of any of them. You look to be so insecure that you have to took her name in order to spill out your insecurity? Not a Teresa Teng era? Do you know who was voted the most influential cultural celebrity in China? Do u know who was voted the most influential woman in modern China? Teresa not Jolin Tsai. Again i'm not a fan of any of them but just stating the fact bcoz you bring out her name in between trying to bring her down. Talk constructive and stop defend yourself by putting other artists down. I didn't say anything against Jolin Tsai. I said put reliable sources. Arorapriyansh333 (talk) 04:15, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

@Arorapriyansh333:That's super funny, you really made my day!!! oh really? you're not a fan of her? I think you haven't known you're the top one editor of her article, you're the man who contributed the most to her article, of your total 789 times of personal edit on Wikipedia, you contributed 434 times to her article, stop saying that man, I really have no idea what kind of person you could be except a fan of her, it's not shameful to say you're her fan, considering you said she is the MOST INFLUENTIAL CULTURAL CELEBRITY in China and the MOST INFLUENTIAL WOMAN in modern China (wow I can never spit out such big words), btw, where is your reliable sources???? XDDDD anyway, i think the one who feel insecure is really you, because you're a fan of her and you don't want to see any praise phrases on other big Chinese-language female artists' articles, even though those words are neutral, so you go change it and try to put other artists down. but I'm confused, she's already the MOST INFLUENTIAL CULTURAL CELEBRITY in China and the MOST INFLUENTIAL WOMAN in modern China, what you're worried about??? LMAO!!! I will never intervene other articles as you've done. I respect any nice users, but you have to respect the situation. peace man----Leehsiao (talk) 06:36, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Reliable sources are everywhere but Wikipedia is not a platform to fight on this. Have wonderful day! Arorapriyansh333 (talk) 06:55, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Arorapriyansh333! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Teresa Teng, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:06, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Arorapriyansh333. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Lightbluerain (Talk💬 Contribs✏️) 08:10, 6 August 2022 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.

Your thread has been archived

Hi Arorapriyansh333! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Next Shark, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Thank you

Your corrections in Mahatma Gandhi are fine. Thank you. But please do not revert the article to reinstate them, for you reinstate much else with it. Please redo just your own corrections. I'm sorry, but it will be easier for you to do it than me. Best, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 13:50, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Jacky Cheung

Dear Arorapriyansh333, I just reverted your changes for World Music Awards for “Bestselling Asian Artist” category as it was stated exactly in the show (on live broadcast, you can find videos on multiple websites). For the bestselling artist in Taiwan, the sentence was linked to page “List of bestselling albums in Taiwan” which stated that Jacky Cheung is the bestselling artist in Taiwan, with 3 albums sold over 1 million. Phạm Huy Thông (talk) 23:16, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)