Jump to content

User talk:Cumbiagermen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Cumbiagermen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  DS 23:18, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Skeleton content deletion

[edit]

This is called page blanking and it is vandalism...when you see this, revert it just like you did with the skeleton article. Sometimes, if you revert it immediately, the vandal will find it amusing and continue to vandalize to elicit reaction from those watching the page, so it is usually best to wait an hour or so before reverting it. Feel free to ask on my talk page if you need help with anything. bcatt 20:16, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Empty column

[edit]

Your addition of an empty "Number of users worldwide" column has been reverted, since columns are useless when empty. If you think this column should exist, add it, but fill it. --logixoul 16:57, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, read your comment on the talk page just now. Anyway, please don't put the column before you have the info to put into it. Okay? --logixoul 17:06, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. --Cumbiagermen 09:09, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Microsoft Narrator and "tequila"

[edit]

At Microsoft Narrator, someone raised the issue of what the significance is of Microsoft Anna being able to speak "tequila". I tested "tequila" with Microsoft Sam in Windows XP, and it seemed fine. What is the issue supposed to be? David H. Flint 03:33, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Windows Live Mail

[edit]

Your edits to Windows Live Mail has been reverted by someone else. I'd like to notify you of this because a concensus has been made in the talk page of the article regarding the use of uppercase "D" for "Desktop" in its name. Please review the talk page prior to making edits. Thank you. Pikablu0530 23:25, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just trying to be bold. Cumbiagermen 04:46, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:AllthatIam.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:AllthatIam.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:31, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Fair use rationale for Image:AllthatIam.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:AllthatIam.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:50, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mcecustomlogo.png listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mcecustomlogo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:37, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello Cumbiagermen! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 5 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Jonathan Glover - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:26, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Calliope-nest edit.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Maedin\talk 17:04, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Comparison of webmail providers for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Comparison of webmail providers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of webmail providers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — billinghurst sDrewth 05:25, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Comparison of webmail providers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a consumer report or the latest magazine stating the best products. Wikipedia does not help you choose products. This information should be under each individual provider, not all clumped together. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Discussion has been going on and all people that have participated agree with the above.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 04:29, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

[edit]
POTD

Hi there,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Calliope-nest edit.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on February 15, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-02-15. howcheng {chat} 08:20, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AfD and PROD notifications

[edit]

Hi Cumbiagermen,

Back in December, you got either an AfD or PROD notification, which was part of the template testing project's experiments. If you could go here and leave us some feedback about what you think about the new versions of the templates we tested (there are links to the templates), that would be very useful. (You can also email me at mpinchuk@wikimedia.org if you want.) Thanks! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 18:51, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ricky martin life album.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ricky martin life album.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:30, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilinking

[edit]

Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia.

I noticed an article you worked on. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:

  • dates
  • years
  • commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
  • common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).

(This even applies for infoboxes.)

Thanks and my best wishes.

Tony (talk) 11:34, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Cumbiagermen. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Cumbiagermen. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]