User talk:It is a wonderful world

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, It is a wonderful world! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Kj cheetham (talk) 11:34, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Kj cheetham! It is a wonderful world (talk) 12:04, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Buddy Baarcke has been accepted

Buddy Baarcke, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 03:58, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Water sports/doc

Template:WikiProject Water sports/doc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:36, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sudoku Cube

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sudoku Cube you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 23:24, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sudoku Cube

The article Sudoku Cube you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sudoku Cube and Talk:Sudoku Cube/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 04:41, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sudoku Cube

The article Sudoku Cube you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Sudoku Cube for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 22:01, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copying from one article to another

I see nothing wrong with the practice as long as the Edit summary mentions the source. For the articles on food allergies I copied content that was common to the physiology of allergy. David notMD (talk) 13:19, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for clarifying :) It is a wonderful world (talk) 15:18, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Matthew Webb

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Matthew Webb you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 13:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Selfstudier (talk) 16:20, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for the review

Thankyou so much for the review of history of chocolate. I only started reviewing GAs so I would know what I needed to do to get this to GA, so I'm very grateful that it received such a careful review and copyedit. Thankyou again. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 13:18, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, it really is my pleasure. Of all people that deserve a good review, it's you after reviewing 60+ of your own. Thank you also for committing to reviewing Matthew Webb, I started writing that article when I was much less experienced than I am now. I hope it's up to standard. It is a wonderful world (talk) 13:27, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Matthew Webb

The article Matthew Webb you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Matthew Webb for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 09:42, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Matthew Webb

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Matthew Webb you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 07:21, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For getting Matthew Webb to GA after a lot of work; not many people work on a level 5 vital article as their first at GA, but you did an amazing job! Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 06:55, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! The process was a lot of work, but absolutely worth it. I have learned so much about writing and Wikipedia, which wouldn't have been possible without such a patient reviewer. It is a wonderful world (talk) 07:09, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Matthew Webb

The article Matthew Webb you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Matthew Webb for comments about the article, and Talk:Matthew Webb/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 07:05, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for History of chocolate

On 7 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article History of chocolate, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that a woman was considered a witch because her husband prepared chocolate instead of her? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/History of chocolate. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, History of chocolate), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:04, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re: S. F. Light

Hello! Let me know if there's anything I can do to get the ball rolling on this. As I said before, I am happy to share offline sources with you as much as I can in lieu of Internet Archive's status. This means, if you want to do any spot checks, I can share the original offline sources with you, in whole or in part, in plain text, or some other way. Let me know. Viriditas (talk) 21:13, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's crazy, I am actually doing the spot check right now! Not sure when IA came back online, I hadn't checked for the last half-week. It is a wonderful world (talk) 21:16, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Viriditas (talk) 21:19, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Passing now, I learned a lot from this review, thank you for discussing kindly on every point, even though some were overly stylistic. It was great that we could converge our perspectives through discussion alone. It's also the first review I have done which has passed the spot check with no issues! It is a wonderful world (talk) 21:59, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will go back and review your points again to see if I can make additional changes. I have been known to continue addressing a reviewer's concerns long after the review has closed to show that I value your time and expertise. Viriditas (talk) 22:15, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nazareth Hall Preparatory Seminary

Hi! Thanks for reviewing the article. I believe I've taken care of the prose, media, and sourcing issues. I'll work on expanding the lead a bit more than I already have.

I do not have a physical copy of source [2], but do have one of source [5] and could email scans if you desire.

I left a couple questions on how to approach certain things you brought up. Thanks again! ~Darth Stabro^{Talk/Contribs} 21:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Darth Stabro, I believe you missed a few prose points on your check through, so I marked the completed fixes with a

, and the points that are still yet to be addressed with a

. The lead looks much better!

For the purposes of keeping conversation in the right place, reply to my comments at the review page rather than here.

Thank you for offering to email [5], I may take you up on that when I do the spot check. I am still going to wait for [2] to be available before doing it though, since it is so heavily used. It is a wonderful world (talk) 22:22, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Matthew Webb

On 30 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Matthew Webb, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Matthew Webb died attempting to swim down the Niagara Rapids? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Matthew Webb. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Matthew Webb), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in the October 2024 GAN backlog drive

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	Your noteworthy contribution (11 points total) helped reduce the backlog by more than 250 articles! Here's a token of our appreciation. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 16:28, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pings

Um, there's really no need to go on pinging that guy, he was unhelpful last time and he's stated clearly that he's not interested. Anyway, if he now does reply (sigh), he will need careful management; be aware that you are the GA reviewer, not him, and you don't have to comply with anything he says. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:23, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, thank you for the advice. It is a wonderful world (talk) 11:27, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar for you

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For your acute assessment of content on Andrew Tate. Each of the points made on the talkpage definitely needed resolving so much appreciated, and any further input is certainly welcome. CNC (talk) 14:36, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CommunityNotesContributor Thank you for this, what I appreciate even more though is your willingness to help fix the problems! It is a wonderful world (talk) 03:26, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

		The Reviewer Barnstar
		Thank you for the thorough and courteous GA reviews you gave Kesteven and Sleaford High School and Sleaford Joint Sixth Form. Your comments greatly improved these articles, while your reviews were efficient, constructive and friendly. Cheers, –Noswall59 (talk) 12:50, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! It is a wonderful world (talk) 13:02, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 12 December 2024

News and notes: Arbitrator election concludes

Arbitration report: Palestine-Israel articles 5

Disinformation report: Sex, power, and money revisited

Op-ed: On the backrooms by Tamzin

In focus: Are Wikipedia articles representative of Western or world knowledge?

In the media: Like the BBC, often useful but not impartial

Traffic report: Something Wicked for almost everybody

Opinion: Worm That Turned's reconfirmation RfA debriefing

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:57, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]