Jump to content

User talk:Macha Panta

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user is a WikiDragon.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:MahaPanta)




vn-1This user talk page has been vandalized once.




Regarding your edits to U.B. Funkeys:

[edit]

Your recent edit to U.B. Funkeys (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a non-talk page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 00:29, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Xener Black.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Xener Black.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:11, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Bones Black.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bones Black.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:06, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits

[edit]

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 20:35, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of U.B. Funkeys

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, U.B. Funkeys, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U.B. Funkeys (2nd nomination). Thank you. A. B. (talk) 21:12, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recipe removed

[edit]

The recipe has been removed. I am looking for an authinic Ratatouille recipe. Please add it to my talk page. MahaPanta (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) --MahaPanta 02:14, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

enlevé par recette de

[edit]

La recette a été enlevée. Je recherche une recette authinic de Ratatouille. Veuillez l'ajouter à mon page d'entretien. Mon Français est mauvais et mon page d'entretien est en anglais, mais sensation librement pour signaler la recette dans laquelle jamais la langue que vous préférez, en fait j'a mis ce message sur mon page d'entretien dans les deux langues, la signalent ainsi sous ce que toujours une vous préfèrent. MahaPanta (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) --MahaPanta 02:15, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ! Following is how to do a Ratatouille. I am not sure is "authentique" but it is one which look quite french to me. For your information, you have to know that not any how to do a course is on the french Wikipédia but all those we have are on Wikibooks. Cheers. Brunodesacacias.

Duplicate images uploaded

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Starter.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:41JgVoz80XL. SS500 .jpg. The copy called Image:41JgVoz80XL. SS500 .jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 03:45, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

zui quan edit

[edit]

The wikipedia masses have agreed as to the flaw in your edit. Notice how I placed a message on the talk page long ago for one such as you to debate the relevance of your addition, so please don't tell me to take it to the talk page. proceed there promptly, please, and argue your case. NJMauthor (talk) 00:53, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's not there. You have nothing there about the edit I undeleted. --MahaPanta (talk) 02:46, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WikiProject Catholicism!

[edit]


Hello, Macha Panta, and welcome to Wikiproject Catholicism! Thank you for your generous offer to help contribute. I'm sure your input will be much appreciated. I hope you enjoy contributing here and being a Catholic Project Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to discuss anything on the project talk page, or to leave a message on my own talk page. Please remember to sign all your comments, and be bold with your edits. Again, welcome, and happy editing! Bewareofdog 17:50, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Maintainer

[edit]

Please stop adding yourself as a maintainer to articles when you have done no work on them and are not one of the article's primarily editors. It can be seen as an insult to the other editors who have done the work on the article when you have made no major contributions to it. Additionally, looking at your contribs, you seem to be very new to Anime and Manga articles. I would suggest you get much more experience in this arena before claiming to be a maintainer and stepping on toes. :) Collectonian (talk) 22:15, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have been experimenting with them in a subpage. I will have them ready for WP:GA? by next Sunday. --MahaPanta (talk) 22:39, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please provide links to these subpages and discuss it with the active editors of those articles? Making a massive change to an article without discussing it with the active editors will likely result in some discord, particularly when you are unfamiliar with anime and manga articles. Collectonian (talk) 22:45, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Most of it is on my test server, which runs on Arch Linux, the "Don't Panic" version. You are also presuming a few things that are not true, let me clear up a few:
  • This isn't my only account.
  • This isn't my only account that is involved with the anime project.
  • This isn't my first account
  • This isn't my first account that is involved with the anime project.
  • This isn't the only MediaWiki I edit on.
  • I edit on some Wikis that only accept anime and manga articles.
  • At other Wikis that use the same coding as Wikiped, I am a SysOp, so I know what I'm doing.
  • This includes the one I created by myself.
  • You also incorrectly assumed I planned on making these changes all at once. This should have been evident when you said you wanted the article to be a Featured Article and I suggested we take it one step at a time. I do have to admit that I incorrectly assumed you were inexperienced at this point.
  • Basically I've been using computers since Windows 3.0, when programming meant making a batch file and the closest thing to Wikipedia was usernet groups.

I hope this has cleared a few things up. --MahaPanta (talk) 00:01, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not really. If you have multiple accounts and decided this one will now work on anime and manga, that's fine. What other Wiki's do and your experiences in other Wikis is, honestly, irrelevant. I run a Wiki myself and edit our work wiki, but of course they both have different guidelines than Wikipedia, which has many guidelines and policies that other Wikis could care less about. Most anime and manga wikis are little more than fansites that require none of the sourcing, tone, neutrality, etc that Wikipedia does. Knowledge of programming and lengthy computer experience is also irrelevant (I have the same, and would never presume that somehow makes me a better editor). It seems we both have misperceptions about one another, though, so that's fine. I just wanted to be sure you were keeping in mind that while many of our articles are, unfortunately, sadly lacking in editor attention, not all are so I wanted to be sure there was no toe stepping. While we work by consensus and of course, no one owns articles, several articles do have primary editors who have done the majority of the work, so its always good to keep them in mind. :-) Collectonian (talk) 00:17, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I understand all of that. I was just letting you know that I'm not new to Anime and Manga articles. I'm sorry if I seemed to be "toe stepping", but a little over three months ago I was in an accident at work and Vocation Rehabilitation has not cleared me to go back, so for over 3 months I have been working on articles on my test server instead. So I've been doing that 40+ hours a week plus the normal time (at least another 20 hours a week) I spend on it which is too much because of my insomnia, which is probably why I'm not making sense. I whole heartily agree with what you said about "unfortunately, sadly lacking in editor attention", and that's why I did what I did. --MahaPanta (talk) 00:32, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Out of curiousity, why work on them on your test server instead of on Wikipedia itself? And trust me, I know what you mean on insomnia. Just to note, though, Trinity Blood (at least) has active editor attention even if it doesn't seem like it at the moment ;) Collectonian (talk) 00:38, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A couple of years ago this one Admin would undo every edit I made saying it didn't meet Wikipedia standards or wasn't formated properly, and never gave me the chance to fix anything. I closed that account and opened another with a personal sandbox on my user page. That eventually lead to me installing a copy of MediaWiki on my test server because people would edit my user/sandbox or complain about it appearing in categories it didn't belong in. --MahaPanta (talk) 01:16, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I can see how that would get frustrating. I ended up CSDing one of my sandbox pages because an editor who I was in a dispute with would not leave it alone. Beyond that, though, no one really bothers them much except bots removing images non-free images (cause I always forget not to include those while working out of article). Collectonian (talk) 01:29, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for understanding. I read your userpage, do you realize your a WikiImp? <(*w*)> --MahaPanta (talk) 03:56, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Only sometimes. :P I will do "drive by tagging" on articles in the anime/manga project or for the TV project, but other times I'd say I was a WikiDragon. I have quite a few articles I've done significant work on, including a featured article and a few featured lists with many more planned. :) Collectonian (talk) 04:11, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WikiDragon? Before saying that, had you seen the banner I added to the top of my userpage before my last message? My third account was a WikiDragon before our registry was deleted. I don't know why it was deleted and not merged with WikiDragon. --MahaPanta (talk) 04:23, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I saw it after answering, and yes. While I do some drive by tagging, I also do some extensive editing on other articles and I've gotten into more than a few arguments over my being bold in my attempts to clean up stuff. Just depends on my mood if I'm feeling impish or dragonish or something else. :P Collectonian (talk) 04:27, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ref (split from above for clairity)

[edit]

Also, I think you may have misunderstood what the refimprove tag indicates. It doesn't mean "clean up the references" in terms of formatting. It means that more references are needed. *grin* Collectonian (talk) 22:15, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Again, this is a mistake because I add some to the subpage I made, and I haven't moved them yet because I just got another call from my mother, she broke her leg again, and I need to take her to the hospital again. As soon as I get back, I will compare the articles to the custom sandboxes I made on my server. --MahaPanta (talk) 22:39, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TOC

[edit]

Just a reminder, but __TOC__ does not need to be manually added to an article, as you did in Fullmetal Alchemist The only time it may be necessary to add it is to have it appear in a different place from the standard (before the first header), to force it to appear when it normally wouldn't (doesn't have at least three headers), or if to use a different format of TOC, which would use a different tag. Collectonian (talk) 23:08, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Part habit, part because I'm coping it my changes over while I'm feeling sick.--MahaPanta (talk) 23:45, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No prob, I hope you feel better! Collectonian (talk) 23:47, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. --MahaPanta (talk) 23:50, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apologizes

[edit]

I was getting some context before figuring out what to do... I would've commented earlier in the article talk, but my comp went down. Hopefully will fix soon; in the mean-time, I've made a note to medcab that I might not be around as much as I'd like. Very sorry! Xavexgoem (talk) 03:12, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NP, I was gone awhile too. I had two doctors appointments in the same day, and couldn't get online. --MahaPanta (talk) 03:50, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:OJS

[edit]

{{Tb|Tinucherian|OJS}} -- Tinu Cherian - 15:59, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. --MahaPanta (talk) 17:03, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pope John Paul II

[edit]
Hi MahaPanta, We are looking for help on the Pope John Paul II article in order to improve it and raise it to ‘Good Article’ and eventually ‘Featured Article’ status. Any help would be most appreciated.
Kind Regards Marek.69 talk 01:42, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:JR Fun Big.gif listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:JR Fun Big.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 14:34, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You should have asked for clarification first. --MahaPanta (talk) 21:17, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've asked user PhilKnight to undelete the image. Jay (talk) 11:17, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. --MahaPanta (talk) 02:14, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your message

[edit]

You're welcome! Abce2|Free LemonadeOnly 25 cents 04:18, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiDragon Census

[edit]

Maha, I've responded on Wikipedia talk:WikiDragon to your question. Also, I'll email you those two files.

Pick a format:

  • Excel 2007
  • Excel 97-2003
  • OpenOffice.org
  • Works 8 Spreadsheet

Let me know on my talk page, thanks. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 17:20, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. I'll get them to you in a few hours. I only have the June file on me at the moment, the February one is at another location. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 17:30, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for File:JR Fun Big.gif

[edit]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of File:JR Fun Big.gif. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.

I do agree as well.

[edit]

I almost wet myself when I saw that an involved editor (who happens to have the power of adminship) reverted a good faith edit, called it vandalism, then protected the page to the version that he prefered. The more I think about it, the more it ticks me off.--Jojhutton (talk) 03:13, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So he's not even an admin, yet he can lock everyone but admins out? I also find it hipocritical that the template at the top mentioning the protection convesation mentions WP:GOODFAITH.--MahaPanta (talk) 03:20, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No I think that he is an Admin. Sorry if I made it sound that he might not be. BTW, there is a discussion about him at WP:ANI. You should check it out.--Jojhutton (talk) 03:33, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's still hypocritical to have the WP:GOODFAITH at the top of the talk page of an article that only Admins are trusted to edit.--MahaPanta (talk) 03:35, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The article seems to be semi-protected now. Hopfully that ill the end of Admins making policy with their admin tools.--Jojhutton (talk) 04:22, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 29 June 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:08, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:JR Fun Big.gif

[edit]

The person who took File:JR Fun Big.gif to AFD, did it incorrectly so I opened the deletion review. Aervanath clossed the discussion with the outcome to delete only if the author refussed to email his permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Please undo the delete.--MahaPanta (talk) 19:44, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • That won't be possible. The author has to send in the permission, then the image will be undeleted. Stifle (talk) 20:31, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • That's how I understood Aervanath's closing statement at Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2009_June_23. Could you atleast undelete the talk page. Even if you think undeleting the image hurts Wikipedia, there can't be any harm in leaving the discussion page for the file open.--MahaPanta (talk) 20:50, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • There is also no use that I can see in having it present. You were the only one who contributed to it; if you need your messages for some reason, I'll copy them to a subpage of yours.
      • Undeleting the image has nothing to do with hurting Wikipedia, it's because it would be a copyright violation for us to use it. Stifle (talk) 08:07, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • You see, there's the problem, I was the only one to follow the policies, and I got screwed.
        • I was refering to the discussion page, but speaking of the image, the author gives free use of all his characters on his webpage.--MahaPanta (talk) 14:12, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
          • You selected one guideline page which stated a subset of the possible reasons for an image being speedily deleted. There are others, which are listed at WP:CSD. I have updated WP:GID accordingly.
          • Can you please provide proof of your claim about free use? Stifle (talk) 14:19, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
            • You'll suppose to discuss major changes before you make them, epecially templates that can effect multiple pages. That's why they have extra guidelines, and the image was being used in a template. The short is that every deletion guideline I've read says to discuss it first. That would prevent mistakes like this.
            • [1] --MahaPanta (talk) 14:32, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
              • Removing an image that violates copyright is not a major change; trust me, there are dozens deleted every day.
              • That page gives permission to use an image as an avatar, on livejournal, or on a blog. Wikipedia is not any of those, and in any case images here must be free for use in any media whatsoever. Stifle (talk) 14:38, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
                • It made a major change to my template.
                • You left out the "etc" which stands for "et cetera" a Latin expression meaning "and other things", "and so on", or "any whatsoever". So he did say that his characters and their images is free for use in any media whatsoever.--MahaPanta (talk) 14:59, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
                • You left out the "etc" which stands for "et cetera" a Latin expression meaning "and other things", "and so on", or "any whatsoever". So he did say that his characters and their images is free for use in any media whatsoever.--MahaPanta (talk) 15:00, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
                  • Unfortunately, it is not precise enough for Wikipedia. Stifle (talk) 15:02, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
                    • It was requested that I chime in. So I'm chiming in. MahaPanta, I must agree that the permission specified doesn't really include the Wiki, even if it may seem evident that it's okay. What Scott has described is what's considered personal use. WikiMedia requires that all images be eligible for commercial use. I doubt he wants people to be able to sell his images. We still need to you shoot an email to scott at vgcats dot com. Ask him whether it's okay to use his cartoons on Wikipedia, and let him know that his response to the email will be filed with the WikiMedia OTRS. Please be sure he knows that any image he grants permission for WikiMedia may be used by anyone for commercial purposes. Let us know the results, and forward the permission to OTRS. Please don't delete the email until the matter is resolved, just in case you need it as proof. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 19:07, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Youth United

[edit]

Hi, I request you to please see to http://wiki.eso.workers.dev/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2009_July_1 for Youth United, I have made some contribution to this discussion. Regards Maihunggogoi (talk) 15:16, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 6 July 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:59, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 July 2009

[edit]

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 11:37, 28 July 2009 (UTC) [reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 3 August 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 05:04, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 10 August 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:25, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 17 August 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:57, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 24 August 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:54, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 September 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 September 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 October 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 October 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009

[edit]

Greetings!

[edit]

Hello, my fellow WikiDragon, good to see you. I was wondering where you find those icons for the top strip on your userpage. Is there some kind of gallery somewhere? The ArbiterѪ★Ѫ 00:39, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 April 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 3 May 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 10 May 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 17 May 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 24 May 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 June 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 June 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 June 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 July 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 July 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 July 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 July 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 August 2010

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 August 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 16 August 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 23 August 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 30 August 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 6 September 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 13 September 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 20 September 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 27 September 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 4 October 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 11 October 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 18 October 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 25 October 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 1 November 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 8 November 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 15 November 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 22 November 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 29 November 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 6 December 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 13 December 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 20 December 2010

[edit]

Ichthus: January 2012

[edit]

ICHTHUS

January 2012
Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

Capture me! I'm a WikiPrincess! :D

[edit]

Hi! I just discovered that I'm a WikiPrincess and I would love to give my opinion on your edits if you are still considered a WikiDragon. I'm friendly and just want to contribute my opinion on wikipedia. :) Thepoodlechef (talk) 04:29, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Capture me! I'm a WikiPrincess! :D

[edit]

Hi! I just discovered that I'm a WikiPrincess and I would love to give my opinion on your edits if you are still considered a WikiDragon. I'm friendly and just want to contribute my opinion on wikipedia. :) Thepoodlechef (talk) 04:29, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)

[edit]

Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.

Steven Zhang's Fellowship Slideshow

In this issue:

  • Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
  • Research: The most recent DR data
  • Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
  • Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
  • DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
  • Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
  • Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

--The Olive Branch 19:15, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Horace Burgess’s Treehouse, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Rushton2010 (talk) 21:22, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Feast day listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

I have asked for a discussion to address the redirect Feast day. You might want to participate in the redirect discussion.

You are receiving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Catholicism and/or WikiProject Saints --Jayarathina (talk) 13:02, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Horace Burgess's Treehouse

[edit]

The article Horace Burgess's Treehouse has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable internet meme

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 04:40, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Horace Burgess's Treehouse for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Horace Burgess's Treehouse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horace Burgess's Treehouse until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 05:08, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Macha Panta. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User Adoption

[edit]

Are you still adopting new users? I'm currently seeking adoption. Tyrone Madera (talk) 08:13, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another census?

[edit]

Can you do a wikidragon census. TigerScientist Chat > contribs 23:44, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.eso.workers.dev/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Macha_Panta&oldid=1166335431"