Jump to content

User talk:Pbsouthwood

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[1]

References

  1. ^
    Accuracy, quality and peer review

    We strive to make Wikipedia as accurate and as good as possible. If you see something you know is wrong, be bold and fix it. If you see something that seems wrong, leave a note on the article talk page and remove questionable assertions if no supporting evidence is provided. You can also use a verification template to add a citation needed tag after the text in question.

    Peer review for accuracy and quality happens constantly through the Recent changes page and watchlists. A review can also be solicited on Wikipedia:Peer review, Wikipedia:Article assessment, and Wikipedia:Good article nominations. If you believe an article is really good, nominate it at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates. More sophisticated approval mechanisms are under constant discussion. Regardless, we do not guarantee accuracy and have a variety of other disclaimers. These are linked from every page, so please do not add more disclaimers to articles!

    There is a semi-automated peer review available. The easiest way to install the script is to enable it as a Gadget: go to your user Preferences and check off the MoreMenu, adds Page and User dropdown menus to the toolbar... entry under Appearance and hit save. Each article page will then have a Page and User pull down menu near the top; go to the article; hover on Page; hover on Tools; click on Peer reviewer.

    To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}

List of amphibians of South Africa

[edit]

Why is raucous toad (Sclerophrys capensis) not included in this list? I don't know much about amphibia, so not sure if it is included under another name. JMK (talk) 17:37, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is there as Amietophrynus rangeri. It seems there is some taxonomic updating needed. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 17:58, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That helps, thanks! JMK (talk) 09:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Mr. Caleb Pup (16:07, 20 November 2024)

[edit]

Hi, I want to know how to make an article in Wikipedia. --Mr. Caleb Pup (talk) 16:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you read Help:Your first article. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 17:40, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Jon Kozuch (19:05, 20 November 2024)

[edit]

I just wanted to include my father's info as a noted famous alumni of CMC. His name is Thaddeus Kozuch. --Jon Kozuch (talk) 19:05, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Where do you want to include this information? · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 02:56, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Akora256 on Talk:OnlyFans (12:40, 24 November 2024)

[edit]

No --Akora256 (talk) 12:40, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a question.· · · Peter Southwood (talk): 16:38, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Aminu Gidado on Lorenz von Westenrieder (13:30, 25 November 2024)

[edit]

Hello --Aminu Gidado (talk) 13:30, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello to you too, How can I help you? · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 13:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from MD Sahib (14:29, 27 November 2024)

[edit]

Say hello and ask your question. How to fix this article. It showing this Give me some advice (This article needs to be updated. (December 2016) --MD Sahib (talk) 14:29, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which article do you wish to fix? Do you have reliable sources to support the changes you wish to make? · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 16:54, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Pbsouthwood. Thank you for your work on Faber Industrie S.p.A.. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing the article! Have a blessed and wonderful days ahead!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:29, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Jemmy Smith (21:39, 30 November 2024)

[edit]

Good day, thank you for being my mentor. I would like to contribute by making verified edits and also create reputable pages. Could you help support that process? --Jemmy Smith (talk) 21:39, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is what we are here to do. If I can't help directly, I should be able to find someone who can. Good luck, and call me when you need the help. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 03:23, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move, over redirect

[edit]

Please move Outline of the Kennedy family to Draft:Outline of the Kennedy family.

I'd do it myself, but there's a redirect in the way.

Somebody deleted it by redirect, rather than move it back to draft space. Looking around Wikipedia at the subject, there appears to plenty of Kennedy-related articles to justify an outline. It just ain't ready for prime time yet. For example, in the titles held section, it doesn't identify who held each title. Definitely still a draft.

Cheers,    — The Transhumanist   09:20, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it should not have been stealth deleted by redirect, and has potential, so will move to draft as requested.· · · Peter Southwood (talk): 11:33, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 11:54, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:James Kirkham Ramsbottom on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – December 2024

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2024).

Administrator changes

added
readded
removed

Interface administrator changes

added
readded Pppery

CheckUser changes

readded

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration


Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Yao's principle on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:30, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Natural sciences Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Oarfish on a "Natural sciences" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:31, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder

[edit]

Came across an outline draft you created:

Draft:Outline of occupational safety and health.

Was wondering if you realized it was still there.

Cheers,    — The Transhumanist   10:47, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I had completely forgotten about it. I now usually create my drafts as user sub-pages, where it is easier to keep track of them. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk):

Feedback request: Geography and places Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Clayton Falls Creek on a "Geography and places" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Leonardo da vin (00:57, 11 December 2024)

[edit]

Hi! This is Leonardo da vin. I want to ask, how do you put pictures in pages (say, such as while editing)? Thanks! -Leonardo da vin --Leonardo da vin (talk) 00:57, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See Help:Pictures for some basic information. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 04:19, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
wow, thanks! Leonardo da vin (talk) 23:01, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
thats very helpful:D Leonardo da vin (talk) 23:10, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are a lot of help pages. Th trick is to know what they are called. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 05:01, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
oh, i see Leonardo da vin (talk) 16:07, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
how in the world do you memorize all those help pages????????? Leonardo da vin (talk) 16:43, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Actually I don't. I just know that there is probably a help page on a topic, type in what seems a likely shortcut or page title, and if that doesn't work, do a quick search. Also useful is to go to any help page and look in the Template:Wikipedia help pages navbox for the topic I need. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 05:10, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Please do not bite the newcomers on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Leonardo da vin (23:08, 11 December 2024)

[edit]

How do you put the link to other wikipedia articles? Ya know, like the blue words that you click on a Wikipedia page --Leonardo da vin (talk) 23:08, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being a good mentor! Leonardo da vin (talk) 00:35, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See Help:Internal links, Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 04:59, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
mm, ok Leonardo da vin (talk) 16:39, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
so, go to Help:Internal links. Okay, gotcha! thanks Leonardo da vin (talk) 16:41, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

how to change Wikipedia article name? (im new to editing wikipedia) Leonardo da vin (talk) 00:43, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See Help:Move, Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 05:00, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ellenbrook line on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:30, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Leonardo da vin (16:38, 12 December 2024)

[edit]

how to put redirects to an article yours is linked to or create a ridirect to yours? --Leonardo da vin (talk) 16:38, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See Help:Redirect, Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 04:39, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Geography and places Good Article nomination

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hawk Channel on a "Geography and places" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Catnip on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question regarding how to conduct a dispute

[edit]

In conducting a dispute on another editor's contribution, is it appropriate to first revert the contribution/remove the content and then begin a talk to get consensus to restore it? Or is it correct to instead tag the content in the article as disputed and then begun a dispute in the article's talk page to get consensus to remove it? I have gotten conflicting answers to this when consulting the relevant articles (WP:TALKDONTREVERT, WP:STONEWALLING seem to support the latter) and asking others on the topic (who seem to support the former) and would appreciate your insight! Sxbbetyy (talk) 17:31, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It depends on the disputed material. If it is a breach of copyright or contravenes the requirements for biographies of living people, it must be removed immediately, with an appropriate edit summary. If it is a dispute of factual accuracy, it depends on the strength and reliability of the sources. When the change is strongly supported by a reliable source, it is usually appropriate to make the change without prior discussion, provide the reference with it, and leave a suitable edit summary. Also, an unsourced claim may be removed without prior discussion if there is plausible reason to believe that it is inaccurate (you must be able to explain your reasoning if challenged). Where the dispute is on interpretation or there are conflicting sources of equivalent reliability, the change should be discussed first. Tagging the disputed content and opening a discussion on the talk page is seldom wrong when you have any doubt. Personal opinions of editors carry no decisive weight on Wikipedia, even if they claim to be an authority, but they should not be dismissed arbitrarily - they may be right. Evidence is required to settle content disputes. When in doubt, ask someone for an independent opinion, but in those cases it is usually helpful to provide links and diffs so they can read up on the background of the specific dispute, as best practice varies depending on the circumstances. Disputes over relevance, neutrality and weight are usually best discussed first, as these are often matters of opinion. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 05:52, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your response, that clarifies things quite nicely and just about matches what I thought was the expectation. As a follow up question, how would one go about handling situations where another editor decided to not follow that expectation and has instead chosen to prematurely remove disputed content that warrants discussion first (including if they engage in edit warring to keep it removed prior to a consensus being reached on its removal)? Sxbbetyy (talk) 17:00, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
First try to engage the editor in a discussion on the talk page to find out why they chose to handle it that way. When explaining you own actions, try not to rely on a wall of shortcut links, rather use a few more words to be more specific, and quote the actual text of any policy or guidance you base your position on. Bludgeoning with shortcut links seldom explains anything, and relies on the reader making the same assumptions that you made, which is seldom the case in a dispute. If they cannot explain their behaviour satisfactorily, you can ask for a neutral third party to assess the situation, and if necessary, report on the incident at WP:AN/I. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 04:05, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Thomas Sewell (neo-Nazi) on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

YOU'RE AN AWESOME MENTOR!

[edit]
YOU'RE AN AWESOME MENTOR!
Thank you for being my mentor Leonardo da vin (talk) 17:04, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you found my advice helpful. Happy editing! Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 04:10, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive

[edit]
January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
  • Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]