Jump to content

User talk:RoySmith

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Earth Day 2022 Edit-a-thon - April 22nd - 2PM EST

[edit]
You're invited! NYC Earth Day 2022 Edit-a-thon! April 22nd!

Sure We Can and the Environment of New York City Task Force invite you to join us for:

This Edit-a-Thon is part of a larger Earth Day celebration, hosted by Brooklyn based recycling and community center Sure We Can, that runs from 1PM-7PM and is open to the public! See this flyer for more information: https://www.instagram.com/p/CcGr4FyuqEa/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

-- Environment of New York City Task Force

How adverse is DYK...

[edit]

More content farms probably generated using LLM AI being cited and linked

[edit]

I undid an addition you made to the article about Margaret Sibella Brown. I think you may need to know a bit more detail about why. The website linked, https://www.botanikks.com/, appears to be generated using LLM AI. Notice how on the page about Entosthodon neoscoticus the binomial is repeated over and over with "M. S. Brown" appended after it. That's not a very human mistake to make. Other pages on the site have similar oddness such as their page on Sequoia Sempervirens that is full of vague platitudes. It also says, "Another disease that can impact Sequoia sempervirens is Sudden Oak Death. This is a devastating disease that can cause the entire tree to die within a few years." While Phytophthora ramorum does infect the species it does not kill trees directly. That's exactly the sort of subtle mistake of fact that is most dangerous for Wikipedia's mission. A couple of editors have started to notice sites like this being cited, especially by new editors. I noticed botanikks when doing one of my periodic sweeps for citations of the similar site put up by Talk:Selina Wamucii.
There is nothing you need to do about this right now, but I think it important to let my fellow editors know about how this problem is starting to crop up on Wikipedia and to be more cautious about linking to or citing commercial websites without a reputation for good editorial oversight. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 16:41, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I saw. I was a bit curious but when I looked at the site in more detail, yeah, it did seem kind of sketch. Thanks for the detailed explanation. RoySmith (talk) 16:45, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
PS, should this be listed on WP:RSN for future reference? RoySmith (talk) 16:47, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I do think that listing it would be a good idea. I've not gotten around to it. We are going to have to figure out a new way of dealing with this sort of semi-intentional spaming by misleading good faith editors. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 19:28, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-50

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:13, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 12 December 2024

[edit]

Tech News: 2024-51

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:22, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]