Jump to content

User talk:Soni

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Trout this user
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:TheOriginalSoni)




Holiday Greetings

[edit]
Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, people's rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension. Happy Holidays to you and yours. It's been a while. Hope all is well! ―Buster7 

You've got mail

[edit]
Hello, Soni. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. ਪ੍ਰਿੰਸ ਆਫ਼ ਪੰਜਾਬ (PrinceofPunjab | ਗੱਲਬਾਤ) 13:29, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to Recall

[edit]

Hey, I noticed you modified the wording on the recall closure.

Don't you think "25 signatures of extended confirmed editors were gathered in time" is also a bit of a weird way to say it? It makes it seem as though the recall was out canvassing and up against a deadline, rather than simply open for signatures.

Thanks, -OXYLYPSE (talk) 11:10, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@OXYLYPSE Probably, but I'll leave that consideration to User:Alalch E. and Wikipedia_talk:Administrator_recall#Concerns_about_the_word_"successful" as the best person to reword their own comment/best place to figure out this wording.
Once we decide on a consistent wording to use in certified/non-certified RRFA petitions, it should be easy to make the template for closed RRFAs with said wording/retrospectively change the wording to match best practices. Soni (talk) 11:21, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the ping. @OXYLYPSE: How would you have said it if you were the closer? —Alalch E. 11:29, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey @Alalch E.. Probably something really dry and neutral, like you'd get back from the government if you complained to them: "Petition upheld. 25 extended confirmed editors signed this petition within thirty days." For the opposite, "Petition not upheld. 25 extended confirmed editors did not sign this petition within thirty days." OXYLYPSE (talk) 11:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"25 extended confirmed editors signed this petition within thirty days" seems like the optimal way to put it for the future. —Alalch E. 11:51, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Numbering scheme

[edit]

Hello, On the ArbCom Candidate question page for Liz, you inserted a follow-up that broke the numbering scheme for the questions. I attempted to fix it here [1]. Does this look right? I'm not confident with wiki markup. Closhund/talk/ 02:57, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Closhund It did work, thank you Soni (talk) 05:28, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Heading levels

[edit]

Hi, I'm not sure why you changed some level 2 headings to level 1 headings at Wikipedia:Administrator recall/RfCs. Level 1 headings are virtually never used, except when a page is transcluding multiple other pages in their entirety. Also, it lead to a confusing organization, as "Current RfCs" was a subheading of "Former RfCs and discussions". Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 20:22, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chaotic Enby I was not aware of Level 1 headings virtually never being used, thanks for that heads up. As for the mess, apologies; it's a bit too late at night and I probably shouldn't have been doing the heading stuff now.
I will suggest though, that we should use a separate heading for RFCs and Other discussions. RFCs are far more binding and the level of detail/importance is valid there. Other discussions, less so, and will continue to happen with way more frequency. I recommend clubbing "Early closure discussions" and "Early workshopping" as subheadings under "Former discussions".
Additionally, I recommend "Policy status discussion" being a subheading of "Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) RfC" or just straight up merged. It was effectively a close challenge of that discussion, so clubbing makes sense.
Generally my rule of thumb is minimal details necessary, simply because we'll have a lot more RFCs and reworkings about recall as the months go on. So I was trying to fit the heading format in a way that's easy to expand away. Soni (talk) 20:31, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Even if RfCs are technically more binding, I don't think that in itself justifies breaking chronological order, especially since some other discussions also tried to reach a binding consensus. I tried to make a separate heading to discuss each RfC/discussion, especially since people visiting this page likely want to look for a specific discussion. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 20:40, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ACE 2024 Questions

[edit]

Hello, Soni,

It looks like you made a comment to me in the middle of my Questions page but one day, I saw it, then I couldn't find it. Could you add your comments as a specific question in the format designated for this at the bottom of the page? I might otherwise not see it, as right now it is buried between other questions. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:56, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin November Issue 2

[edit]


MediaWiki message delivery 18:18, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

[edit]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
943 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Trinamool Congress (talk) Add sources
182 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Southern Tier (talk) Add sources
513 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Cuisine (talk) Add sources
116 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Houston Police Department (talk) Add sources
504 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C 2023 elections in India (talk) Add sources
1,095 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Congee (talk) Add sources
6,274 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B United States presidential election (talk) Cleanup
623 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Toaster (talk) Cleanup
576 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party – Iraq Region (talk) Cleanup
60 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Suzette Jordan (talk) Expand
1,251 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Nagasaki (talk) Expand
936 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Srinagar (talk) Expand
15 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Music of Olympia, Washington (talk) Unencyclopaedic
2,184 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Right-wing populism (talk) Unencyclopaedic
557 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Perennial candidate (talk) Unencyclopaedic
230 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Political violence in the 2024 United States presidential election (talk) Merge
1,226 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Middle Eastern crisis (2023–present) (talk) Merge
26,684 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Israel–Hamas war (talk) Merge
9,274 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B January 6 United States Capitol attack (talk) Wikify
65 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Space Coast Junior/Senior High School (talk) Wikify
32 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Larry Levinson Productions (talk) Wikify
7 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Bwizamani Singh (talk) Orphan
7 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Ratan Tata: A Life (talk) Orphan
13 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Nexus Treasure Island Mall, Indore (talk) Orphan
140 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Rupam Islam (talk) Stub
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Lazy 8 Studios (talk) Stub
11 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Battle of Munford (talk) Stub
139 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Online database (talk) Stub
15 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start C21 Malhar Mall, Indore (talk) Stub
154 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Government of Assam (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:25, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Snuggle/Notice

[edit]

Wikipedia:Snuggle/Notice, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Snuggle/Notice and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Snuggle/Notice during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  23:13, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to provide feedback

[edit]

Inspired by Worm That Turned's re-RfA where he noted administrators don't get a lot of feedback or suggestions for improvement, I have decided to solicit feedback. I'm reaching out to you as you are currently one of the users I've selected as part of my recall process. I hope you will consider taking a few moments to fill out my feedback form. Clicking on the link will load the questions and create a new section on my user talk. Thanks for your consideration. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:30, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin December Issue

[edit]


MediaWiki message delivery 18:03, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]