User talk:Wikimasterclassboss

Welcome!

Hi Wikimasterclassboss! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 17:52, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks you so much and i truly appreciate you, thanks again Wikimasterclassboss (talk) 17:54, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Draft:Lp certified—has been undone because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thank you. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 18:56, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks a lot, I was just trying to add in all I can find on the subject. Thanks for the great tips Wikimasterclassboss (talk) 18:59, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lp certified (October 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CoconutOctopus were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The formatting of this article is all over the place. Please ensure it is fixed before resubmitting!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lp certified and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CoconutOctopus talk 20:43, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikimasterclassboss! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CoconutOctopus talk 20:43, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Lp certified has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lp certified. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:38, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Lp certified has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lp certified. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 21:31, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Lp certified has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lp certified. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 18:31, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you Wikimasterclassboss (talk) 19:03, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Wikimasterclassboss! The thread you created at the Teahouse, creating and editing new pages, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 06:24, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lp certified (October 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There is one source (FFTV Magazine, obscurely presented as "Los Angels, CA (Jan 17, 2021) LP Certified - Review of the Magcover Sit-Down" and) which might be OK though it is paywalled so I'm not sure about that. Websites like boomplay, audiomack, and deezer contain no information and fill no function. Same with the genius link – that's just the lyrics for one of his songs, and the reference has been added with a misleading title.. The draft has been declined a few times, and every time some inappropriate sources have been removed but others have been added, and it doesn't really look like you have read the decline notices and the information about what kind of sources are needed.

Please do read this guideline and this guideline, and please make sure that any sources are presented in a way that makes it clear to the reader what they are. This how-to guide might be helpful.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lp certified and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 15:24, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks alot Wikimasterclassboss (talk) 15:28, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see that a couple of people in the Teahouse thread you posted mentioned the importance of formatting references properly. Please do take that information to heart and read the info pages linked in that thread (as well as in the decline notice above).

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lp certified (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Frostly were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The Elevator Mag source is paid content, and the BMI link doesn't contain prose, only a song listing. Please take a look at the feedback provided by previous reviewers on what sources are required to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lp certified and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Frostly (talk) 04:26, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]