Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Guild homeHow to copy editTemplatesBarnstarsParticipantsCoordinators
RequestsDrivesBlitzesMailing listNewsletters

Note: this page is automatically archived using YiFeiBot_2; completed requests are archived after 24 hours. Manual archiving is normally unnecessary. Please check and fix incorrect codes, missing timestamps, etc. For more information, please see the bot request page. – Baffle gab1978 (talk)

Guild of Copy Editors' requests page

On this page, you can request that the Guild of Copy Editors copy-edit specific articles.

Instructions for requesters

To make a request, remove any existing {{copy edit}} tags from the article, then click this button and follow the instructions:

Please remove any existing {{copy edit}} tags from the article to avoid edit conflicts during the copy edit.

Please note:

  • No request by an unregistered editor will be accepted unless the IP has done significant work on the article. Drive-by IP requests already on the list may be declined by any editor.
  • The average waiting time is two or so months. Please be patient and feel free to improve your requested article while you wait.
  • If you plan to nominate the article for good article, A-class or featured article status, please wait until the copy edit is complete before nominating it.
  • Having your article copy edited by our team does not guarantee that the prose will be considered acceptable during any of the above reviews.
  • You may have up to two open requests at any one time. This is enforced so that every request can have a fair chance of being fulfilled within a reasonable period.

Requests may be declined if the article is:



October 2024

[edit]

Hi, I plan to make Land reform in interwar Yugoslavia a GAN and I believe the article would benefit from a copyedit. Thanks!--Tomobe03 (talk) 15:17, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Working Dhtwiki (talk) 00:14, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For a future GAN.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 21:59, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Working Baffle☿gab 01:19, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Highly unsourced. DareshMohan (talk) 06:20, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Working. The article has 39 sources right now. Sourcing is not part of copy editing. I will edit the prose. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:56, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:31, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another GA article I made. Tried my best to de-fluff it but I think copy-editors do it the best. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 12:22, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Working voorts (talk/contributions) 02:46, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. I left some maintenance tags requesting clarification. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:38, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

[edit]

I want to submit the article for a GAN and a copyedit would improve the article, as said in peer review. Thanks! Rahim231 (talk) 06:07, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article is in need of in-depth copyediting. Thank you!. OceanHok (talk) 10:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Working Mox Eden (talk) 08:05, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Second request. For GAN. Thanks Amir Ghandi (talk) 10:52, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To advance towards FA status (FAC). Thanks!!! Sam S (talk) 03:40, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I plan to make the Temporary National Representation article a GAN, but I believe the article would benefit from a copyedit to improve its prose. Cheers. --Tomobe03 (talk) 15:48, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working towards a FA nomination (FAC) for veiqia (tattooing practice in Fiji) and have just competed a copy edit myself, but I would be really grateful if another editor has time and interest to look for things I may have missed Lajmmoore (talk) 11:51, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Partly done. Worked on this for style, punctuation, smooth English reading and general cleanup. Consider it good and ready to be blessed by a more senior copy editor of the GOCE. Here.it.comes.again (talk) 04:18, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would like some copyediting done to fix any unclearness or poor wording in the prose. For a future renomination for GA (GAN). Thanks. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 14:45, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Current GA which I plan to take to FAC in the new year. Would appreciate any and all notes as I have no experience in the FAC process. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 21:07, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FA from 2008 that hasn't run on the main page (TFA) and could use a strong copy-edit. Harizotoh9 (talk) 05:31, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FA from 2009 that has also not run on the main page. Appears quite stable but it would be nice if the article has a copy-edit before running on the main page (TFA). Harizotoh9 (talk) 05:31, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Working Moritoriko (talk) 01:56, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I recently did an overhaul and a brief copyedit of my own. I just want to make sure there are no errors in the article, so am requesting a copyedit please.Cltjames (talk) 12:28, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Potential for GAN.Tintor2 (talk) 18:44, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I put this article up for GAR which failed and the reviewer recommend I seek assistance here. I think it's possible I have read this article too many times to be of much assistance. Czarking0 (talk) 18:24, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

[edit]

Old FA article that I recently made changes to. Would appreciate a copyedit. Thanks in advance. LittleJerry (talk) 22:21, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically, the story section would benefit from the input of someone experienced with plot summaries, but any other changes of course more than welcome. I plan to bring this to good article status (GAN). Jonathan Deamer (talk) 09:38, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another old article I worked on years ago but never bothered to have it copyedited. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 00:05, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Old FA. I recently added some more text. Would appreciate a copyedit. Thanks in advance. LittleJerry (talk) 00:06, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Currently a GAN on hold. Per the reviewer request of putting this article up on GOCE.KjjjKjjj (talk) 15:40, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Episode plot summary makes little sense to those who haven't watched the series. A possible GAN. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 17:33, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just expanded from sandbox. Will nominate for GA (GAN) in the near-future but I plan to go for FA (FAC) in the long run. Erick (talk) 06:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of expansion has been done to the article for the last three months. I intend to bring it to GA (GAN) if it's good enough. Thank you. – Yolo4A4Lo (talk) 10:57, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article translated from ru.wiki. I would like to nominate it for featured article (FAC) as article is complete, but my English grammar is not too good. Sławobóg (talk) 14:45, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recently promoted FA. But, I want to make sure there we aren't missing any grammar lapses and typos since I added a tad bit more. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 22:38, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another NGE article. For a future GAN.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 07:42, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possible GAN. A peer review has been done to this article, and I think another round of copyediting would help. The Cadillac Ranger (talk) 01:53, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As part of an initiative to improve articles about key Shia figures, this particular article has recently undergone a major revision. Before nominating it for GA (GAN), I'm asking for your help to further improve the prose. Thanks! Albertatiran (talk) 15:10, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm requesting to take a review on this to be renominate on GAN. If you have any questions just let me know. Royiswariii Talk! 05:16, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Mostly  Done, but I'd appreciate a second review from another copyeditor, specifically on the matter of number agreement involving the group's name. Something about the way it's sometimes referred to as "they" and sometimes as "it", with corresponding conjugations in other words ("they were" but "it was"), throughout the article is nagging at me, but I can't quite put a finger on how to straighten it out to make things consistent. Fluffernutter (talk) 13:58, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GAN: content-wise this is ready, but am having trouble making it read clearer, especially in Background and recording and composition; would like to see someone else give this a shot at writing. // Chchcheckit (talk) 14:02, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm not a good copyeditor myself, so I'm requesting another article. I fixed a lot, but this needs more fixes. This is pretty lengthy, but this is an interesting article. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 08:47, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • @TheNuggeteer:  Done. However, there was one sentence I struggled to untangle, and I think it could use more attention:
    Under "Rebuilding", there is a sentence that says (after my tweaks) "The project required three phases: the planning, which was initiated in December and was finished in January, Implementation, which was deployed shortly after and ended in February, and then the full second phase, with whom a partner deployed another related project, which was deployed in April and ended at the end of the year." This is...really unclear. My understanding of it, which may or may not be accurate, is that there were three phases:
  1. The planning phase (begun in Dec, ended in Jan)
  2. The implementation phase (why is "Implementation" capitalized?) (begun in January and ended in February)
  3. The second...phase? But we've already covered two phases, so isn't this the third phase?? Also what partner, and what related project, and why aren't we naming those? And once we sort that out, we really ought to change at least one of those "deployed"s to some other word to avoid repetition.
If you can give me some clarity on that sentence, I'm happy to go back in and rework it accordingly. Fluffernutter (talk) 16:48, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for taking long, I was busy updating things. For 1st, nothing's wrong with it, right? For the 2nd, uncapitalize Implementation. For the 3rd, the source states that it's named the "second phase" even though it's supposed to be the third. I found that the partner was CBO, which I don't know. I tried searching, but the only thing that popped up was Cotabato Airport, and I don't think an airport is eligible to be a business partner. For the rest of the changes, sure.
Thanks for copyediting this article! 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 00:01, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the quick response, TheNuggeteer! Between what you said here and what is said in the source, I pieced together a version of that sentence that I'm happy with. So your copyedit is now officially done! Fluffernutter (talk) 13:26, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, that's my first time writing an article in english, so i'm not so used to the grammar. The FAC failed and Skyshifter recommended to come here. BernaBotto (talk) 15:39, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article is in need to be copyedited. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 13:26, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For possible FAC. Pamzeis (talk) 15:23, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Has patchy prose. Needs strong grammar correction. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:13, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]