User talk:Lisha2037
Your submission at Articles for creation: Ritu Khullar has been accepted
[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Jamiebuba (talk) 22:49, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicholas Devlin has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
~Liancetalk 01:44, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Kathleen Roussel moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to Kathleen Roussel. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. C F A 💬 21:52, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Ritu Khullar
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ritu Khullar you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 14:21, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Ritu Khullar
[edit]The article Ritu Khullar you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ritu Khullar and Talk:Ritu Khullar/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 10:23, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Ritu Khullar
[edit]The article Ritu Khullar you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Ritu Khullar for comments about the article, and Talk:Ritu Khullar/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 08:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Susanne Craig
[edit]Hi Lisha, I saw you renominated -- I'm going to remove your renomination but just for a half an hour or an hour then it'll go back up. It's to avoid confusing the bot that maintains the GA pages -- Reidgreg is going to put in the fail and I don't want the bot to get confused about there being two simultaneous nominations. Don't worry about the nomination apparently disappearing -- it'll come right back. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 21:40, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ok wasn’t sure what was happening as the other editor won’t be able to pick it up unless there’s a nomination. Lisha2037 (talk) 21:42, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- There will be another nomination -- shouldn't be long as Reidgreg said they're working on the text of the fail they'll post. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 21:44, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Now renominated. It should show up in the GA nominations page in about twenty minutes. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 22:28, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Thebiguglyalien I think it’s now ready. Lisha2037 (talk) 22:39, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Now renominated. It should show up in the GA nominations page in about twenty minutes. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 22:28, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- There will be another nomination -- shouldn't be long as Reidgreg said they're working on the text of the fail they'll post. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 21:44, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Susanne Craig
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Susanne Craig you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:23, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot. Also, If there’s a certain editing style you prefer let me know. I definitely want this article to be made green! :) Lisha2037 (talk) 01:24, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red
[edit]Hi there, Lisha2037, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to have a dynamic Canadian journalist interested in improving our coverage of women. Given your GA success with Ritu Khullar and your nomination of Susanne Craig, not to mention all the improvements you have made to several other biographies of women, it certainly looks as if you will be a useful member of the project. I realize you are already a highly competent editor but when writing about women you might find it useful to look through our Primer. You might also like to sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members where others will be able to see your interest in the project. As you have been working on improving articles up to GA, you might like to take a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Green. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 09:26, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2024
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Ipigott (talk) 09:26, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Susanne Craig
[edit]The article Susanne Craig you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Susanne Craig and Talk:Susanne Craig/GA2 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 22:25, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Susanne Craig
[edit]The article Susanne Craig you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Susanne Craig for comments about the article, and Talk:Susanne Craig/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:21, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2024
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Kathleen Roussel
[edit]
Hello, Lisha2037. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kathleen Roussel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
DYK for Susanne Craig
[edit]
On 26 November 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Susanne Craig, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Susanne Craig won the Pulitzer Prize for Explanatory Reporting for her reporting on Donald Trump's taxes after receiving a copy of his tax records in her mailbox? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Susanne Craig. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Susanne Craig), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red December 2024
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 18:45, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination of Sanjay Kumar Verma for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjay Kumar Verma (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.―"Ghost of Dan Gurney" (hihi) 11:24, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi…umm I never put it forward for review as it was still a draft in progress. Not sure what is happening here but it’s definitely not ready. Lisha2037 (talk) 22:01, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- Another user repeatedly moved the article into mainspace from draft. As it's a contested draftification, it now requires a consensus at AfD to return or else I'd have been continuing the move war. Not your fault at all and this message was given to you automatically by the script that I used to nominate at AfD. ―"Ghost of Dan Gurney" (hihi) 22:49, 3 December 2024 (UTC)