User talk:MtPenguinMonster
Index
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
A cup of coffee for you!
[edit]
|
I think you might prefer this one! :)))
(thanks again for your contributions!!) xRozuRozu (t • c) 00:54, 24 September 2024 (UTC) |
- Thanks! --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 02:24, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed you unmerged references in this article some months ago [1]. I'm just curious what the reason for this was? Bogazicili (talk) 20:19, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- A lot of the references used quotes. I think that using unmerged references makes it more clear which quote corresponds to which source. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 00:43, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the feedback. I think bulleted merged references would be clearer? What do you think? I think the original intent in merging references in the lead was that they would be less of a distraction. Many FA articles do not even have references in the lead. Bogazicili (talk) 17:53, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- I agree that merging references can be good for making the article less cluttered. However, if a source is quoted, it is good to have the quote and its source in their own
<ref>tag to make it as clear as possible that the quote corresponds to the source. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 02:58, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- I agree that merging references can be good for making the article less cluttered. However, if a source is quoted, it is good to have the quote and its source in their own
- Thanks for the feedback. I think bulleted merged references would be clearer? What do you think? I think the original intent in merging references in the lead was that they would be less of a distraction. Many FA articles do not even have references in the lead. Bogazicili (talk) 17:53, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Photographic Chemical
[edit]
Hello, MtPenguinMonster. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Photographic Chemical".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:09, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 11
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Information manipulation theory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page White lies.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Your recent non-admin close at ITNC
[edit]Hi, I reverted your non-admin WP:SNOW close. Only three people had !voted, and the discussion was open for barely an hour, which is way too little to establish consensus. For comparison, the Sudan discussion had three people !voting to support at first, but ended up going the other way, so this is not enough to know which direction it will take with certainty. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 23:52, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- That seems fair. I accept the revert. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 00:08, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Malili Lake System
[edit]Hello, MtPenguinMonster. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Malili Lake System".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 11:26, 13 December 2024 (UTC)