User talk:Silver seren/Archive 30
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Silver seren. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 25 | ← | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 |
Templates on article Keffals when nominated for deletion
I disagree that templates should not be added to an article when the article is nominated for deletion. There is no rule against this, and I don't think it makes the article "look worse during the deletion discussion". On the contrary, I added them for the sake of pointing out specific obvious issues that need to be addressed (like the dubious sourcing), in the hope that the article could be improved and NOT be deleted.
Multiple articles nominated for AfD include template tags describing what needs to be improved with the article, (albeit most were added before the article was nominated for AfD, but not all.) I won't be adding back the template on the Keffals article for the time being, but deleting template tags solely because the article is part of an ongoing AfD discussion doesn't feel like the most justifiable reason. JungleEntity (talk) 18:04, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- Tags existing before are usually part of the reason for AfD nomination. Any tags you want to add after a deletion discussion is opened can be added after the discussion is over with. And if the article is deleted, then there's no need to add the tags at all (obviously). So I stand by my statement that adding tags after a deletion discussion is opened is an attempt to make the article visibly look worse, as it is an unfortunate fact that how an article looks plays a massive role in how a deletion discussion progresses, instead of just on direct notability requirements. So, again, if the article is kept, you can add the tags afterwards. SilverserenC 18:06, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Keri Blakinger
Hello! Your submission of Keri Blakinger at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Bruxton (talk) 15:16, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Greetings Silver seren. Any chance you could beef this one up with some good newspaper coverage? FloridaArmy (talk) 05:02, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- *salute* I shall do my best. SilverserenC 05:37, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Artie Belle McGinty
On 25 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Artie Belle McGinty, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 1920s and 1930s radio show actress Artie Belle McGinty played the original radio advertisement voice for Aunt Jemima? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Artie Belle McGinty. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Artie Belle McGinty), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Keri Blakinger
On 31 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Keri Blakinger, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after Keri Blakinger left Cornell University to serve time in prison for possession of heroin, she returned to finish her degree and then became a criminal justice reporter? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Keri Blakinger. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Keri Blakinger), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 51
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 51, May – June 2022
- New library partners
- SAGE Journals
- Elsevier ScienceDirect
- University of Chicago Press
- Information Processing Society of Japan
- Feedback requested on this newsletter
- 1Lib1Ref May 2022
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:45, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Dorli Rainey
On 30 August 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Dorli Rainey, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 03:05, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Sources for Peter Mungai Warui
Hi there! Do you mind me asking how you found those sources for Peter Mungai Warui? I conducted several sources using Google and Newspaper archive with several relevant search terms but didn't find anything.
I wondered if you'd mind sharing your method with me so I can improve my own source searches for future AfDs. Thanks! MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 21:43, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, MarchOfTheGreyhounds! I didn't do anything special, actually. Same thing Joseph2302 did, a Google search for "Peter Mungai" boxer. The source they found was on the front page of results, but I had to dig onto the 5th page and beyond to get the sources I put in the AfD. It looks like Kenya-related sources don't have very good SEO and so don't get very high on the search results. I didn't even use any of the databases I have access to through The Wikipedia Library (TWL), though now that I check on Proquest through there, looks like there's a lot more available sources there too:
- And that's just from the first page and a half of sources out of 130 results. Not bad. I also don't currently have my Newspapers.com access renewed yet through TWL, so there might be more stuff available there as well. If you don't have a TWL account (though maybe you do already, you did just mention newspaper archives), I would highly recommend applying for one. There's so many different databases to use through it to find sources. It's often practically the only reason I'm able to make articles on more obscure people and subjects, like almost all of the sources I used to make Lou Swarz. SilverserenC 21:59, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks so much! It just goes to show how important it is to dig through several pages of results. I make a living writing SEO articles but it had never occurred to me an entire country would have such poor SEO!
- I do have a Wikipedia Library account but I've been using Newspaper Archives as opposed to Newspapers.com, which I assume is better, so I'll have to work out getting on that. Thanks for your help, it's very appreciated. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah, Newspapers.com is more specialized, so you have to directly apply for an account through TWL. If you go to the "Available Collections" tab, you can click the apply button for it and go through the required form there. Hopefully you manage to get it, I've found it to be light years better than Newspaper Archives and also the ability to clip out parts of pages and link to them publicly so everyone can view the clipping is great for sourcing and helping readers access the material at the same time. SilverserenC 22:18, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Any xhance you can oend me a hand on his one? Zora Neale Hurston is said to have been an alumnus. Not sure on others but there are some nice old photos and I think it's an interesting and significant piece of the puzzle for the African American community of Jacksonville. FloridaArmy (talk) 01:30, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- Sure, I'll take a look once my Newspapers.com subscription gets renewed. Still waiting on that and it makes source searching difficult without it. SilverserenC 02:01, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- Cool. Thanks. FloridaArmy (talk) 11:41, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Dorli Rainey
On 13 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dorli Rainey, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Dorli Rainey, at the age of 84, was pepper-sprayed by police at a 2011 Occupy Seattle protest, making her a symbol of the Occupy Wall Street movement? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dorli Rainey. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Dorli Rainey), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Schwede66 12:03, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Zita Moulton
On 20 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Zita Moulton, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that actress Zita Moulton first starred in theatre performances after a bet with her fiancé that she would be able to get a stage job within 24 hours? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Zita Moulton. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Zita Moulton), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Some baklava for you!
|
Your work at William Hogeland is impressive, many thanks! VickKiang 03:08, 24 September 2022 (UTC) |
- Thanks! I just enjoy finding sources. It's relaxing, honestly. :P SilverserenC 03:11, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 52
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 52, July – August 2022
- New instant-access collections:
- SpringerLink and Springer Nature
- Project MUSE
- Taylor & Francis
- ASHA
- Loeb
- Feedback requested on this newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:21, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Christopher W. Shaw
Hi Silver! What do you think of the notability of Christopher W. Shaw? Seems like he meets GNG, but I wanted to be sure. Are there any biographic profiles on him that can be used to flesh out the article? Best, Thriley (talk) 21:29, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Seems quite possible. I'll have to do a deeper dive into him. A bit late to get to it tonight, but I will get to it. SilverserenC 04:34, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Tova Friedman
On 10 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tova Friedman, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Tova Friedman is a Holocaust survivor who now posts videos of her life and survival on TikTok? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tova Friedman. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tova Friedman), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
|
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 15,258 views (635.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of October 2022 – nice work! |
theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 17:44, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Questioning Collapse
On 12 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Questioning Collapse, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the book Questioning Collapse was created as a critique of the claims made by Jared Diamond in his book Collapse? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Questioning Collapse. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Questioning Collapse), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Daniel Larsen has a new comment
- Yeah, that's exactly what I was thinking needed to happen after I made it at the base name and noticed the problem. Thanks for doing that, Robert McClenon! I wasn't sure if it would mess up the AfC submission template. SilverserenC 20:26, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- No. If your question was whether moving/renaming a draft that has been submitted will affect the status of the submission, it will not. Drafts are commonly renamed/moved for any of a variety of reasons, mostly either to disambiguate them, or because they were incorrectly named, and the template is designed so as to handle moving/renaming of the draft. This is a common situation, and it usually works correctly. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:48, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's exactly what I was thinking needed to happen after I made it at the base name and noticed the problem. Thanks for doing that, Robert McClenon! I wasn't sure if it would mess up the AfC submission template. SilverserenC 20:26, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Dudley Poplak
Thank you so much for your work on Dudley Poplak! For some reason I did not notice it until now. I would have nominated it for DYK otherwise. Best, Thriley (talk) 03:17, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
- No problem. The annoying part for me is that I just know there's more news sources out there on him from the 1960's through the 80's, but they're likely to be in more select UK publications that aren't digitized yet. SilverserenC 03:21, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Dawn Dickson
Thanks for your hard work on Dawn Dickson. There is a relevant ANI discussion in progress. I thought I might mention what happened with Dawn Dickson as it was such a waste of everyone's time (and very frustrating)...but wanted to let you know, first. Cielquiparle (talk) 16:25, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Larsen (mathematician) has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
97198 (talk) 00:46, 9 November 2022 (UTC)DYK for GPS Air
On 12 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article GPS Air, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a class-action lawsuit against Global Plasma Solutions claimed that their air-purification devices used in schools did not function as advertised and were potentially harmful? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/GPS Air. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, GPS Air), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Greetings
Hi Silver, You're more experienced than me here, so I defer to you in your revert. I'll just note that I was neither saying that option X was 'invalid', nor was I editing someone else's comments. I reverted a change to the RFC prompt to avoid it breaking WP:RFCNEUTRAL. It's my understanding that claims that an RFC is malformed are perfectly fine in the discussion, but not appropriate for the prompt itself. I'd like to learn, so I'd earnestly like to know whre I'm wrong. DFlhb (talk) 19:59, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- Why would having an option for saying the RfC is a bad RfC be non-neutral? That is just as neutral of an option as any of the 1-4 options given in the first place. SilverserenC 20:01, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- Because it presents a specific argument (which others have contested), rather than an option. A neutral version would be:
- Option X: This RfC is malformed.
- DFlhb (talk) 20:03, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- I'd also like to just clarify what your edit summary said: it is true that "this RFC is malformed" options were added to prompts on past RSN discussions, or did you mean that proposing that an RFC is malformed (in the discussion) has been done in past RSN discussions? I haven't seen the former, but again defer to your experience. DFlhb (talk) 20:07, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- I've seen "Bad RfC" added as an option in past discussions, yes, along with people simply posing it in the discussion. It happens both ways. SilverserenC 20:19, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- Good to know; I appreciate it. DFlhb (talk) 09:19, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
- I've seen "Bad RfC" added as an option in past discussions, yes, along with people simply posing it in the discussion. It happens both ways. SilverserenC 20:19, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- I'd also like to just clarify what your edit summary said: it is true that "this RFC is malformed" options were added to prompts on past RSN discussions, or did you mean that proposing that an RFC is malformed (in the discussion) has been done in past RSN discussions? I haven't seen the former, but again defer to your experience. DFlhb (talk) 20:07, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- Because it presents a specific argument (which others have contested), rather than an option. A neutral version would be:
Books & Bytes – Issue 53
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 53, September – October 2022
- New collections:
- Edward Elgar
- E-Yearbook
- Corriere della Serra
- Wikilala
- Collections moved to Library Bundle:
- Ancestry
- New feature: Outage notification
- Spotlight: Collections indexed in EDS
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi Silver! I recently was putting some drafts into article space including Simon N. Groot, which was redirected. Groot won the World Food Prize which I think is a major enough award to justify an article even as a short stub. What do you think? Best, Thriley (talk) 15:08, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
- He's definitely notable and meets the GNG, though I feel like you would avoid a lot of the headache you frequently get, Thriley, if you made more complete articles with full sources before moving them to mainspace. :P SilverserenC 16:44, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
- It’s true. I’ve dug myself even deeper with more drafts over the last few months. I just can’t seem to stop making drafts! There’s such a crazy amount of really notable people without articles. My plan is to get as many of them as possible into article space and then over the next few years come back later to 5x expand them. I need to return to when I only have a few dozen drafts going, not a few hundred! Thriley (talk) 18:09, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Non-unacceptable behavior
Hello, I'm GabberFlasted. I wanted to let you know that one or more of contributions, specifically this edit to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents have been reported to ArbCom because they appear to humanize you. Wikipedians are expected to behave like opinionless bureaucratic automata, particularly on the Noticeboards, where nothing silly ever happens. Editors are expected to perceive other editors as obstructions and potential enemies, and your humanizing actions undermine the core values of The Cabal. If you have any questions, please silently read all project policies and guidelines until you find your answer. Thanks. GabberFlasted (talk) 14:50, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Simon Groot
On 26 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Simon Groot, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that agronomist Simon Groot was awarded the 2019 World Food Prize for giving hundreds of millions of people access to nutritious vegetables? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Simon N. Groot. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Simon Groot), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Daniel Larsen (mathematician)
On 30 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Daniel Larsen (mathematician), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that mathematician Daniel Larsen was the youngest contributor to the New York Times crossword puzzle? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Daniel Larsen (mathematician). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Daniel Larsen (mathematician)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Happy Holidays
|
Happy Holidays | |
| Hello, I wish you the very best during the holidays. And I hope you have a very happy 2023! Bruxton (talk) 17:50, 25 December 2022 (UTC) |
Hi Silver! I haven’t found any good sources for the book Half the Child by William J. McGee. Any chance you could take a look for a source? McGee has been in the news a lot lately commenting on this past week’s air travel debacle. I thought it would be good to get the article out now- I started the draft a few weeks ago. Hope you have a happy new year! Best, Thriley (talk) 17:46, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
- I've done what I can, Thriley. What do you think? SilverserenC 23:53, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you so much!! I’ll add some about his books and commentary. Probably will have some fun DYK hooks! Best, Thriley (talk) 01:10, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Tharun Moorthy (January 7)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tharun Moorthy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Silver seren!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 22:18, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
|
- I rewrote the entire article, Theroadislong. Why does the paid editing claims even matter at this point? SilverserenC 22:22, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, feel free to re-submit and I'll leave it for another reviewer. Theroadislong (talk) 22:28, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Tharun Moorthy (January 8)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tharun Moorthy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Nothing Personal
Hey @Silver seren, I apologize for not being aware of the DYK nomination for this article. If I had known, I would have waited a few days before making the AFD nomination. I want to make it clear that I have no personal issues with you or with the subject. My main goal is to address the problem of sock farms and promotional articles. However that is not the primary reason for the nomination. I do believe that this article deserves an AFD nomination and my actions were taken in good faith. Even if it did not involve sock puppetry, I would have nominated this article. I hope you can understand and not take any of this personally. Akevsharma (talk) 01:18, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
FA is more sinned against than sinning
Thank you for your offer of help on their talk page. Because they have become closely watched please be careful that none of the help you give could be construed by the uncharitable as proxy editing. I don't want either of you to fall foul of folk watching their activities.
I think your offer of help is sound, though it might be even more useful were you to edit some of the pieces you feel to be almost ready with any edits you feel appropriate and then move them to mainspace yourself, tidying the AFC artefacts up after the move. If you feel that is appropriate then it might be better for you to pick drafts of your choice from this search rather than their recommending drafts for you to submit.
I've suggested to them a number of times that their imposed restriction to use AFC should be appealed, but I understand their reasons for not doing so. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 23:06, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
- For now, I'm going to go through the AfC process rather than unilaterally moving them to mainspace. But I will definitely be editing them to fix up references and other such things. And I will want there to be good references in the article before submitting. I think working on making sure drafts are proper to be submitted with FA is more beneficial in the long run. SilverserenC 23:11, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
- They work well with co-operation. If I had more interest in the area they edit I would collaborate with them more. I do try to review their drafts, and I accept those I can. Many I pass on as too specialist for my skillset.
- Regrettably, their early work built the rod for their back, because it was extraordinarily prolific but very much unready. Their skills in writing what we need have improved substantially. Still, sometimes, they drop the referencing ball. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 23:27, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: South River Forest has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 10:51, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Tharun Moorthy at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step III of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 05:04, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 54
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 54, November – December 2022
- New collections:
- British Newspaper Archive
- Findmypast
- University of Michigan Press
- ACLS
- Duke University Press
- 1Lib1Ref 2023
- Spotlight: EDS Refine Results
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:15, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Tharun Moorthy
On 31 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tharun Moorthy, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that for his first film, Operation Java, director Tharun Moorthy and his production team handpicked all 83 actors rather than doing an open audition for roles? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tharun Moorthy. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tharun Moorthy), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Has this subjext received coverage in newspaper? Thanks. Happy February. FloridaArmy (talk) 08:26, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Will be looking into this soon, starting with what S0091 found on the talk page. SilverserenC 02:25, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi Silver! Any chance there is an obituary out there for George Henderson (farmer)? Best, Thriley (talk) 01:09, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- There doesn't appear to be a direct obituary I can find, unfortunately. Here's some stuff I was able to find though:
- I hope these prove useful instead, Thriley. SilverserenC 02:47, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- These are great! Thank you so much for digging those up. Thriley (talk) 05:21, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
DYK for William J. McGee
On 7 February 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article William J. McGee, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that William J. McGee said that the 2022 Southwest Airlines flight delays were the result of "appearing to regulate rather than actually regulating"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William J. McGee. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, William J. McGee), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
-- RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
My sincere apology for irrational AfD
I just wanted to write this to tell my deepest apology for a two-week gap within both AfDs involving Speaker Knockerz (noms. #2 and 3). It was just that the second nomination was ineligible due to a speedy delete without consensus. It seems why I have to nominate it again for the third time without reviewing the last votes. I hope you understand. Darrion "Beans" Brown 🙂 (my talk page / my sandbox) 20:43, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Please Miss
On 16 February 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Please Miss, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Grace Lavery's autobiography Please Miss discusses her transition but also the "paradigmatic concept of the penis"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Please Miss. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Please Miss), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
-- RoySmith (talk) 07:18, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Please agf
[1] This isn't me. If you think it is, please ask me directly instead of casting aspersions. I started a talk page conversation about the irrelevant quote, per BRD. Starting an edit war with an IP would just sink the ship of the talk page topic I started. Checking the geo ip on that v6, I'm over 1000 miles away from it. So, please consider the implications of what you said. Thank you Very Average Editor (talk) 07:12, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
ANI report over worst WP:CIVIL violations I've come across
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Jeppiz (talk) 02:04, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Third Opinion
Per WP:3 I am informing you that I have requested a third opinion on the content edit for the Rick Berman article now that you have reverted my edit twice without adequately addressing the numerous issues I have pointed out regarding the weakness, insufficiency, lack or reliability, or outright inapplicability of your provided references. I have done all I can to help you avoid defaming a living person based on rumors and I'm done talking to you about it. 47.197.37.230 (talk) 04:45, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- Okay, I await the result. SilverserenC 13:47, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Requesting inputs
Requesting your inputs about few more queries @ Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Bicycling in Islam. Bookku (talk) 19:04, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 55
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 55, January – February 2023
- New bundle partners:
- Newspapers.com
- Fold3
- 1Lib1Ref January report
- Spotlight: EDS SmartText Searching
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:45, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Existential Physics
On 18 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Existential Physics, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that physicist Sabine Hossenfelder's book Existential Physics discusses whether free will, the multiverse, the existence of God, and the meaning of life are topics that science can answer? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Existential Physics. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Existential Physics), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
BorgQueen (talk) 12:03, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
Thanks!
I just saw the comment you left on the Dutch page on Eddie Izzard and would like to thank you. Though it wasn't the right place for it, the sentiment is much appreciated. Several requests to ban the bigots were done but they were unfortunately all shot down. I guess there's still a lot of work to do for queer liberation in the country that was the first in the world to legalise gay marriage... Incomprehensible... Mx.Alba (talk) 21:48, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- For all the good my statement did, sadly. I think it says quite a lot (negatively) about the community over there. Since the things they were saying about LGBT people was just blatant bigotry that would get someone here saying just one of the things they did banned in a heartbeat. The fact that no action was taken about the editor after repeated and multiple statements like that is appalling. If that sort of activity continues on the Dutch language Wikipedia as a whole, I really do think that we may need a Foundation intervention in the future, because it implies the admins there are rotten to the core. SilverserenC 22:46, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- Seriously though, just one comment like this would have someone rightfully topic-banned at minimum for POV pushing over here.
- "Well, the cancel culture in full swing : silence anyone who disagrees with the prevailing ideas about transgenderism (= transgender ideology)! Who do I think I am with my carefully reasoned criticism? It is no wonder that Orwell's 1984 is often referred to in discussions on this subject . War is peace, two plus two is five, criticism is hate, a man is a woman."
- It's just so blatant. SilverserenC 22:55, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- And then this being an example of how the admin community there is broken:
Not performed - Transphobia is not a reason for blocking
. SilverserenC 22:59, 19 March 2023 (UTC)- Imagine how it was for me being on the receiving end of all that as a trans person and getting a ban for calling it out... Mx.Alba (talk) 05:43, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- It's just ridiculous. At least there were a couple people standing up for you there, but the fact that no one was addressing that editor's repeated statements, many far worse than the one I quoted here, is just...ugh. Sorry that you had to go through that. Hopefully bigots like them actually get dealt with eventually, for the benefit of the encyclopedia as a whole. At least the article finally has the right name in the lede and pronouns now, even if it took over a year to accomplish. SilverserenC 05:50, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- I would apologise on behalf of my national wiki but I'll be honest, there's a reason I very rarely edit there. Thank you for your valiant effort, though PS: not all hope is lost --Licks-rocks (talk) 09:45, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- It's just ridiculous. At least there were a couple people standing up for you there, but the fact that no one was addressing that editor's repeated statements, many far worse than the one I quoted here, is just...ugh. Sorry that you had to go through that. Hopefully bigots like them actually get dealt with eventually, for the benefit of the encyclopedia as a whole. At least the article finally has the right name in the lede and pronouns now, even if it took over a year to accomplish. SilverserenC 05:50, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Imagine how it was for me being on the receiving end of all that as a trans person and getting a ban for calling it out... Mx.Alba (talk) 05:43, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- And then this being an example of how the admin community there is broken:
- Seriously though, just one comment like this would have someone rightfully topic-banned at minimum for POV pushing over here.