Jump to content

Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/November 2022

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive and its contents should be preserved in their current form;
any comments regarding this page should be directed to Wikipedia talk:In the news. Thanks.

November 30

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

Technological development

  • OpenAI officially released the freely available generative AI chatbot ChatGPT, the stable release became available on 8th of August 2024

Disasters and accidents

Law and crime

Politics and elections


(Posted) RD: Christiane Hörbiger

[edit]
Article: Christiane Hörbiger (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Kleine Zeitung
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Actress from Vienna, from a dynasty of actors, Burgtheater, Salzburg Festival, but pleasing audiences most in television series. Many awards. The article was a stub, sadly. I expanded and sourced the prose. What's missing are refs for some of the films, and for some of the awards. The films have articles, so I hope to find something there. The awards are impressive if we only take those with a ref. Sorry for bringing "her" late - I was on vacation. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:19, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I now added refs to films and awards. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:31, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Shatzi Weisberger

[edit]
Article: Shatzi Weisberger (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): JVP-NY, BuzzFeed News, Middle East Eye
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Expecting an obit to additionally verify death. Probably shouldn't run before that's out and cited in the article. ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 19:31, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: John Hadl

[edit]
Article: John Hadl (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): New York Times
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Needs a lot of referencing work. I plan on working on it. BeanieFan11 (talk) 02:01, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • The "Professional career" section is orange-tagged for inadequate sourcing and the back half of the section has a few footnote-free paragraphs. Stats tables at the bottom of the wikipage also need sources. Please add more REFs. --PFHLai (talk) 12:19, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Christine McVie

[edit]
Article: Christine McVie (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Guardian
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Fleetwood Mac vocalist / keyboardist --Vacant0 (talk) 19:47, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support Article is extensive and updated. Subject was a prominent member of Fleetwood Mac, a major global musical act (R&R Hall of Fame, 4 US and 4 UK number one albums, etc) GeoGreg (talk) 22:02, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. McVie was an integral part of Fleetwood Mac's most successful lineup. Wrote many of the band's biggest hits, including "Don't Stop", "You Make Loving Fun", and "Everywhere". Lunaroxas (talk) 22:49, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've now addressed the tags; some of the sourcing is not brilliant but hopefully it should be enough to alleviate the opposition above. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:28, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Abu al-Hasan al-Hashimi al-Qurashi

[edit]
Article: Abu al-Hasan al-Hashimi al-Qurashi (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [1]
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: 3rd Caliph of the Islamic State 4me689 (talk) 19:05, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Davide Rebellin

[edit]
Article: Davide Rebellin (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [2]
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Italian racing cyclist 4me689 (talk) 15:40, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Two new minerals Elkinstantonite and Elaliite

[edit]
Articles: Elkinstantonite (talk · history · tag) and Elaliite (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Two never-before-been-seen on Earth minerals, Elkinstantonite and Elaliite, are discovered inside a 17-ton meteorite (Post)
News source(s): [1]
Credits:

Article updated

 CMD (talk) 08:42, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per above Editor 5426387 (talk) 20:19, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Interesting story, but, per above, doesn't quite make it to ITN. Maybe DYK? PrecariousWorlds (talk) 10:45, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. This belongs more to the DYK page. Vida0007 (talk) 16:02, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted blurb) Blurb/RD: Jiang Zemin

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: Jiang Zemin (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Jiang Zemin (pictured), former General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party, dies at the age of 96. (Post)
News source(s): [3]
Credits:

Article updated

 CMD (talk) 08:42, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support blurb, important political figure passes.
B-MIKE -(Talk) 12:52, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose on quality for now, 15 citation needed tags - Dumelow (talk) 13:00, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose on quality, sourcing issues. Oppose blurb would support RD only because we have nothing extra to say than that he died. No extra explanation means nothing to say in a blurb. --Jayron32 14:07, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose on Quality. Still one CN tag. Zemin's role in developing modern China is quite large - certainly more notable than just any old leader. DarkSide830 (talk) 14:13, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support blub and RD but please wait a few hours. People are already starting to work on improving the article, with a fast pace of edits. I'm personally trying to add citations to Kuhn 2004 which seems like a respected work; hopefully the CN tags can be resolved quickly. DFlhb (talk) 14:29, 30 November 2022 (UTC) I didn't know the difference between blubs and RD, so I forgot to specify I support both; edited 23:58, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I have been trimming down the article for a bit. It feels like multiple different people with very little knowledge of the subject has been using the article for an essay-writing practice, so I decided to be aggressive and remove a good chunk of unsourced statements. Plenty of redundant text blocks, too. Juxlos (talk) 14:48, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Juxlos: I appreciate your efforts here, but unfortunately I think this has may have been a bit overzealous, for example "Beginning in 1996, Jiang began a series of reforms in the state-controlled media aimed at promoting the "core of leadership" under himself, and at the same time crushing some of his political opponents" and statements like that. If true, it sounds like the sort of thing that should be in the article, and we should concentrate on trying to find sourcing for it rather than chopping it... It's a bit of a paradox, because we want everything cited, but equally we don't usually remove material on sight without at least verifying that no obvious sourcing is available... Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 16:21, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I've added a bunch of citations and a fair bit of detail, and with the help of other editors we've finally resolved all citation needed tags. The article is still light on details on his actual tenure; I'll start work on that. But at least there don't appear to be any obvious falsehoods. I think we're good to go. DFlhb (talk) 19:50, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support blurb Significant former head of state and article looks good. --2601:249:8E00:420:1409:FBDA:FC7:F1DA (talk) 20:07, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support blurb important leader, former leader of China. article highly notable. Editor 5426387 (talk) 20:22, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 29

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime


RD: Aline Kominsky-Crumb

[edit]
Article: Aline Kominsky-Crumb (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Washington Post
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Thriley (talk) 06:14, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Derek Granger

[edit]
Article: Derek Granger (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Thriley (talk) 04:11, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Trial of Stewart Rhodes

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Article: Stewart Rhodes (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Stewart Rhodes (pictured), founder of the right-wing Oath Keepers, was found guilty of Seditious conspiracy after his attempts to violently prevent the inauguration of Joe Biden at the January 6, 2021 United States Capitol attack. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Stewart Rhodes (pictured) is found guilty of seditious conspiracy for his role in the January 6, 2021 United States Capitol attack.
News source(s): WashPo
Credits:
 CT55555(talk) 22:22, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not important... Tbh most people have likely never heard of this person or have any interest. This is simply important to too few people. NoahTalk 00:10, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Oppose one of many that have been tried and convicted for Jan 6 and certainly not the last. --Masem (t) 23:58, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just for context "Stewart Rhodes’ conviction is the most significant to emerge from the Justice Department’s investigation of the 2021 attack on the Capitol." CT55555(talk) 00:00, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Simplify the blurb. It's too long. Most readers won't have a clue who this bloke is, nor what he was charged with, so will just ignore this. Maybe something like " Stewart Rhodes found guilty of Seditious conspiracy following the January 6, 2021 United States Capitol attack." HiLo48 (talk) 00:21, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
When I first raised the idea on the talk page, I was told to make it longer...I'm happy for it to be shorter. CT55555(talk) 00:38, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. There's only one potential conviction from 1/6 that would be notable enough for ITN. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 01:23, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK. This is my first time here, so it seems like I've misjudged this. I had thought a news items on the front page of UK and US news would be a good enough indicator. Are you implying that a presidential conviction is the magnitude of what is needed to make ITN? CT55555(talk) 01:27, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The working consensus of ITN/C leans very conservative (not in the political way) as to what is posted on the main page. Trials don't have to be at the level of O.J.'s, but some degree of unique significance is needed. Curbon7 (talk) 01:50, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It seems sensible to withdraw this as WP:SNOWBALL opposed, but I don't know how to, so if anyone reading this wants to do that, I'd be grateful. CT55555(talk) 14:24, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, Not an interesting subject for ITN. Alex-h (talk) 14:16, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Withdrawn) Repeal of Section 377A in Singapore

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Article: Section 377A (Singapore) (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The Parliament of Singapore votes to repeal Section 377A of the Penal Code, legalising same-sex activity between men. (Post)
News source(s): CNA, SCMP
Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: Significant repeal of a law which previously criminalised sex between men. Alt blurbs are welcome, I just put in a blurb which I felt was the most succinct to describe the repeal. I considered using an image of Pink Dot SG, but no recent free images of that exist (latest dates back to 2014), so an image of the Singapore Parliament should suffice instead. JaventheAldericky (talk) 18:14, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not the first and wont be the last. NoahTalk 18:58, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose laws change all the time, and they are not always permanent. Editor 5426387 (talk) 19:20, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - per above PrecariousWorlds (talk) 19:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

November 28

[edit]

Disasters and accidents

Law and crime

Science and technology


RD: Donald McEachin

[edit]
Article: Donald McEachin (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): WHSV3 (Fox)
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American state politician Engineerchange (talk) 04:53, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regretful oppose To say this article is bare is the understatement of the century... I obviously don't expect articles coming through here to cover every detail, but there at least has to be some level of holisticness in the prose. Curbon7 (talk) 06:16, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've added some tags through the article, where necessary, and made efforts to start an electoral history section, which I cannot do at the moment. Sunshineisles2 (talk) 06:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Important death, deserves to be posted. Rushtheeditor (talk) 17:37, 01 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How important someone is is irrelevant to RD. Curbon7 (talk) 22:45, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support While the article is bare compared to other members of Congress, we have seen worse articles posted on RD. Also to mention McEachin was an important figure in VA politics, making history as one of the first Black people to run for a certain position. Hockeyisthebest123 (talk) 19:02, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Mauna Loa Erupts

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Mauna Loa (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The Mauna Loa Volcano in Hawaii begins to erupt (Post)
News source(s): https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/alert-level-raised-hawaiis-mauna-loa-volcano-after-eruption-usgs-2022-11-28/
Credits:
Nominator's comments: First eruption since 1984, in a populated area. Might be too early to post, but worth keeping an eye on. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 17:06, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait. It's far too early to know what the impacts will be - so far it's just a bit of lava confined to the summit, and some red skies. Mauna Loa erupts effusively, so it's possible that the increasing volumes of lava start flowing downhill over the following days, and reaches populated areas (the last eruption almost reached Hilo). But unless that happens, it doesn't have the impact necessary for ITN. As a procedural point, if this eruption becomes significant enough to merit consideration for ITN, it would have enough material to split out 2022 eruption of Mauna Loa and use that as the bold link, rather than a few sentences in the much broader Mauna Loa article. Modest Genius talk 17:24, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Agreed. I was just putting this out there to alert people of a developing story that could become ITN-worthy. Though maybe I'm not nominating correctly(I'm new to Wikipedia) PrecariousWorlds (talk) 17:38, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Closed) Ongoing: China COVID Protests

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Protests against COVID-19 lockdowns in China (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
Credits:
Nominator's comments: Protests keep spreading throughout China, with media attention growing. Might be too early for ongoing, but it's worth consideration. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 11:02, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wait until blurb is removed. Kirill C1 (talk) 14:02, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wait per above Editor 5426387 (talk) 14:23, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

November 27

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Law and crime


(Posted) RD: Allan Wright (farmer)

[edit]
Article: Allan Wright (farmer) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NZC
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: New Zealand farmer and cricket figure Dumelow (talk) 13:13, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[ATTENTION NEEDED] RD: Dr. James Wright

[edit]
Article: James Wright (doctor) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://7news.com.au/lifestyle/popular-media-personality-dr-james-wright-dies-just-short-of-95th-birthday--c-9001895
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Australia's first celebrity doctor HiLo48 (talk) 05:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AFLW Grand Final

[edit]
Article: AFL Women's season seven Grand Final (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The Melbourne Demons win the AFL Women's season seven Grand Final (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In Australian rules football, the Melbourne Demons defeat the Brisbane Lions in the the AFL Women's Grand Final
News source(s): The GuardianABC
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: Article is fully referenced and complate. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:41, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • ALERT ALERT ALERT!!!!!!! I know this is about a sport and a country none of the Admins here care about. Even worse, it's only about WOMEN'S sport. But at least have a bloody look at this nomination!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HiLo48 (talk) 23:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well, I looked at it. Problem is, much as I think we need more women's sport in ITN ... it's not really ITN, is it? Probably because it's only the 7th time the tournament has ever taken place. As far as I can see, we're really only featuring international women's tournaments so far (apart from a random US basketball and a volleyball tournament, but they take place together). Now that's something we should probably be looking at, but at the moment I don't think a competition in one of its first iterations meets ITN standards. Black Kite (talk) 23:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Because of the nature of Australian rules football, an international championship is unlikely for a long time. This is the peak championship in the sport. Kinda like the World Series, if being international is an issue. Even if an international championship evolved, this would be the more important event for much longer still. This is the women's equivalent of the AFL Grand Final, an ITN/R event. HiLo48 (talk) 02:43, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    ...if being international is an issue: But then we have at the top of ITNC:

    Please do not...Oppose an item solely because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. This applies to a high percentage of the content we post and is generally unproductive.

    Bagumba (talk) 05:55, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
WTF? I wasn't the one who objected on the basis of it not being international. HiLo48 (talk) 06:10, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There is international interest. Both sides have Irish players and there is considerable coverage over there. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 06:21, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I was only responding that "being international" is not supposed to be an issue, not that you originated the issue. —Bagumba (talk) 08:28, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I know this is about a sport and a country none of the Admins here care about: The decision to post any item is driven by consensus from the community, not any particular admin's preference. —Bagumba (talk) 06:02, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So why was it totally ignored for 27 hours? THAT was my reason for that somewhat pointed comment. HiLo48 (talk) 06:10, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There aren't many active admins these these days. Look at the RD nominations. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 06:21, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The WP:WIKICUP also ended in October. —Bagumba (talk) 08:26, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
!Voting here is not limited to admins. —Bagumba (talk) 08:23, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I can assure the world that this HAS BEEN headline news in Australia, which is obviously enough. HiLo48 (talk) 10:39, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. While I'm sympathetic to the desire to get more women's sport into ITN, this does not appear to be significant enough. Aussie rules football is a minority sport that doesn't merit more than one story per year, and we already post the men's event. The women's version is recently established, small, and attracts a tiny fraction of the news coverage (at least as far as I can find from Google News). If they had been held at the same time then a joint blurb might make sense; but IMO the women's event doesn't reach the bar for a blurb on its own. Modest Genius talk 13:46, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The men's event is huge. Routinely attracts an audience in the stadium of over 100 thousand people. It's a whole day thing. The women's event cannot therefore be at the same time. You are therefore effectively saying you won't ever post the women's event. And Google News obviously won't show you what the coverage was like in Australia earlier this week. HiLo48 (talk) 22:05, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't expect the women's event to be as big a deal as the men's, but I do think they need to be within a factor of a few of each other to be considered similarly important. It appears there's currently more than an order of magnitude gap in the media coverage, attendance, TV audience etc. Why wouldn't Google News pick up the coverage? Modest Genius talk 17:12, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
...in a country with fifteen times the population. So not much of a claim really. HiLo48 (talk) 21:13, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Still, an average attendance of just 2,700? Why is that worthy of posting? BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:26, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Low-quality league with small attendance, it's also full of people who play multiple sports part-time. This tells you the depth and quality of competition. If people from outside Aus saw photos of the players, they would strong oppose - many of them are in terrible physical condition Bumbubookworm (talk) 00:26, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
On that basis, every article on Test cricket from before around 1980 should probably be deleted from Wikipedia. HiLo48 (talk) 09:08, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How does that make any sense? BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:19, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Simple and well known fact. (Perhaps not in the USA.) In those days it was common for Test cricketers, especially Australians, to play other sports. And all teams tended to have some players who could not have been described as being in great physical condition, typically spin bowlers and hard hitting batsmen. HiLo48 (talk) 22:49, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's not true anyway. They are elite athletes and look like this. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:16, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This one most certainly is not, although yes, some of them are proper athletes. Bumbubookworm (talk) 05:22, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[ATTENTION NEEDED] RD: Richard Baawobr

[edit]
Article: Richard Baawobr (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Vatican News
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Ghanaian Catholic bishop - Dumelow (talk) 10:55, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Clare Marx

[edit]
Article: Clare Marx (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Royal College of Surgeons
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: British medical doctor. Date of death not stated but first reported on 27 November - Dumelow (talk) 10:50, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) China COVID protests

[edit]
Article: COVID-19 protests in China (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Mass protests across China break out in response to the government's Zero-COVID policy. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Mass protests across China break out in response to the government's Zero-COVID policy, which had led to a fire in Urumqi killing at least 10 people.
News source(s): CNN, BBC
Credits:

Nominator's comments: This has been brewing over the last few days but lots more articles now talking about it. Likely may end up in ongoing eventually. Article is currently in good shape. Masem (t) 05:06, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Posted. Note: as it stands, the wording of the alt-blurb seemes too convoluted. El_C 12:09, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The fire should probably be included as a separate bolded link within the blurb, as it's notable in its own right. Although it's too short to pass ITN on quality at the moment.  — Amakuru (talk) 17:42, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Here's the thing - the fire doesn't have long-term notability compared to the protests, so there's no reason a separate article on it should be made. It should be part of the protest article. This is where editors tend to lose focus of NOTNEWS because they want to be first to create that new article. Masem (t) 23:32, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 26

[edit]

Disasters and accidents

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports


(new) RD: Henrie Adams

[edit]
Article: Henrie Adams (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): tucomarca.com
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Dutch concert band leader who worked in Spain for three decades, leading an award-winning band. New article, but consolidating the refs was tricky, especially while on vacation which made it late, sorry. I asked the creator of this new article for help but no answer. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:37, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: Relatively light on depth (essentially a "CV in prose format"); anything else that can be said about his musical style as a conductor? SpencerT•C 06:49, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    How would I know? I looked for more sources, and was happy to find one (!) in English (which supported much of the prose which the former five didn't). Both Dutch and Spanish are almost Chinese to me. Images (in the sources), video, number of recordings and length of tenure tell me enough about notability which shouldn't be of much importance anyway. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:57, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Eleanor Jackson Piel

[edit]
Article: Eleanor Jackson Piel (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NY Times
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Major American civil rights lawyer. Practiced law until her 90s. Article has just been created. Thriley (talk) 06:47, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Jimmy Cole (American football)

[edit]
Article: Jimmy Cole (American football) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Memphis Tigers website
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Died on November 17, seems to have been first reported on November 26. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:30, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Jens Bullerjahn

[edit]
Article: Jens Bullerjahn (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): MDR
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: new article about a politician who was finance minister in the German state of Saxony-Anhalt from 2006 to 2016, and now died at age 60 from a rare disease --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: David Murray (cricketer)

[edit]
Article: David Murray (cricketer) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CNN ESPN
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Oriental Aristocrat (talk) 08:56, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Doddie Weir

[edit]
Article: Doddie Weir (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [5]
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Rugby player Haris920 (talk) 20:42, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support Article is of good quality TRAVBRUHH (talk) 09:04, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Vladimir Makei

[edit]
Article: Vladimir Makei (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Reuters
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Foreign minister of Belarus since 2012 Mr. Lechkar (talk) 15:02, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Jorge Medina

[edit]
Article: Jorge Medina (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Página Siete
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Notable civil rights activist Krisgabwoosh (talk) 00:54, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 25

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

Law and crime


(Posted) RD: Mochamad Hasbi

[edit]
Article: Mochamad Hasbi (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Jawa Post
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Indonesian politician. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 17:39, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Irene Cara

[edit]
Article: Irene Cara (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [6]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Lots of citations needed, I'm busy all day so can't really help fix Awkward42 (talk) [the alternate account of Thryduulf (talk)] 11:23, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Ismail Tara

[edit]
Article: Ismail Tara (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [7]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Ainty Painty (talk) 10:22, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 24

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports


(Posted) RD: Hans Magnus Enzensberger

[edit]
Article: Hans Magnus Enzensberger (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Der Spiegel
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: German author and poet Grimes2 (talk) 12:10, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Börje Salming

[edit]
Article: Börje Salming (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NHL, CTV
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 --BabbaQ (talk) 18:26, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done.BabbaQ (talk) 15:02, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's a shockingly fast decline from his public appearances two weeks ago. Unfortunately, I've had to orange-level tag three sections (one, the list of awards, was subsequently deleted), and there are several {{cn}} tags throughout the article. Modest Genius talk 15:17, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. And fixed.BabbaQ (talk) 16:13, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I see that the national team text was moved, but its coverage remains sparse. —Bagumba (talk) 17:07, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've undone that move - club and international play are fundamentally different so shouldn't be merged. Looks like an attempt to get around the orange tag without actually improving the article. Modest Genius talk 17:29, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Having a section with a few sentences are weird in my opinion. Someone might be able to expand.BabbaQ (talk) 17:38, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have some sources that should help with that. I can add to it in a few hours from now. Kaiser matias (talk) 21:46, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Have expanded it, but will leave for others to determine if the tag should remain. Kaiser matias (talk) 01:19, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Also added one source. BabbaQ (talk) 08:07, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Struck my oppose above.—Bagumba (talk) 01:26, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The death place in the infobox is unsourced, and not mentioned in the body. The death date is wrtten as 24 November, but the cited sources only say his death was announced on that date, not explicitly mentioning when he died. Is there anything more definitive?—Bagumba (talk) 10:06, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed a sourced that states he died at his home in Nacka. But good call to see that.BabbaQ (talk) 10:14, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And that source also confirms he died on Thursday (24th).—Bagumba (talk) 15:30, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Duplicate) 2022 Malaysian general election

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Article: No article specified
Blurb: ​ After the 2022 Malaysian general election produces a hung parliament, Anwar Ibrahim (pictured) is appointed as the Prime Minister of Malaysia. (Post)
News source(s): Reuters, AP
Credits:
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.
Nominator's comments: Election was five days ago, but there were difficulties in forming a coalition for a majority in Parliament to appoint a Prime Minister, and this appointment has just been made today. starship.paint (exalt) 07:09, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Refer original nomination on 19th November. gavre (al. PenangLion) (talk) 08:45, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

November 23

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Politics and elections

Sports


(Posted) RD: O'dell Owens

[edit]
Article: O'dell Owens (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Cincinnati Enquirer
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American medical doctor - Dumelow (talk) 07:59, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Betty Ray McCain

[edit]
Article: Betty Ray McCain (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [8]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 – Muboshgu (talk) 15:20, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) 2022 FIFA World Cup Group E

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2022 FIFA World Cup Group E (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Spain wins 7-0 against Costa Rica in a football match in the 2022 FIFA World Cup marking the biggest win of a team since the 2010 FIFA World Cup. (Post)
News source(s): [9]
Credits:
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Closed) 2022 Chesapeake shooting

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2022 Chesapeake shooting (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ A shooting at Walmart leaves 7 dead and 5 injured. (Post)
News source(s): CNN
Credits:
Nominator's comments: Significant shooting. Article needs work, but will support once ready. Interstellarity (talk) 11:48, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Mass shootings are common in the US. We can only post the most severe ones.
NoahTalk 12:13, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Closed) 2022 Düzce earthquake

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2022 Düzce earthquake (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ A magnitude 6.1 earthquake in Düzce, Turkey injures more than 50 people. (Post)
News source(s): Retures, Al Jazeera, Bloomberg, Independent
Credits:
 Ainty Painty (talk) 09:38, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

November 22

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Sports


(Posted) RD: Frances Campbell-Preston

[edit]
Article: Frances Campbell-Preston (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Times
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Thriley (talk) 16:04, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Helicopter crash in Charlotte NC

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: WBTV#2022_helicopter_crash (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ A 1999 Robinson R44 helicopter nicknamed Sky3 crashes into the embankment of Interstate 77 in Charlotte, North Carolina, killing two WBTV station employees. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The FAA and NTSB launch an investigation into the fatal crash of Sky3, 1999 Robinson R44 helicopter belonging to the WBTV news station.
News source(s): [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]
Credits:
Nominator's comments: First time I've ever done this. Not sure if this is how you do it. But we just had a helicopter crash close one of our major interstates during holiday traffic and two news station employees died. No one knows why it came down, witnesses just say it was in trouble. Because it was 2 news station employees killed this is all over the news right now - CNN, New York Times, Associate Press, you name it. User:EEBuchanan 03:51, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - I don't see that a small helicopter crash with such a low death toll is notable. And I see no coverage about this except locally. In recent months, we are averaging at least a helicopter crash a day, and I've never seen one ITN before. Nfitz (talk) 04:35, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nfitz You may be right. Still, It's on CNN, New York Times, Associated Press, and some others I haven't had time to link yet. That's not exactly local. The thing is less the crash and more the fact the news company employees involved, that's why people are interested. A crash is one thing. A helicopter crashing and killing two news employees, and their colleagues having to report it on air on their own station, is a bit different/out of the ordinary. Plus a lot of interviewed witnesses are saying the pilot deliberately steered into the embankment, possibly to avoid traffic and nearby buildings - that also seems a bit unusual. EEBuchanan (talk) 04:37, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How is not local to only one country? And surely most of the other, daily, helicopter crashes are more notable, given the circumstances under which they happen. What is internationally notable here? Nfitz (talk) 05:12, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nfitz Fair enough. As mentioned never done this before so wasn't sure how it worked. Thanks!
EEBuchanan (talk) 05:17, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) RD: Cecilia Suyat Marshall

[edit]
Article: Cecilia Suyat Marshall (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [10]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 – Muboshgu (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: John Y. Brown Jr.

[edit]
Article: John Y. Brown Jr. (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): WKYT
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American politician, a Good Article - Dumelow (talk) 20:34, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Article looks good.CoatCheck (talk) 04:05, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination: England and Wales are now minority Christian countries for the first time [11] [12] Alborzagros (talk) 18:05, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 21

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Science and technology

Sports


(Posted) RD: Michael Hampe

[edit]
Article: Michael Hampe (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): WDR
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: German stage director in drama and even more opera, 20 years general manager of the Cologne Opera, and on the important stages of the world. After Germen reunification he founded a festival in Dresden. Detailed article created last year. - Back then I cut out everything not sourced (which was much). So now there were basically just tenses to change. Obits we have are short, but there may be more. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:59, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another obit added. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:06, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Will we manage do deal with this anytime soon, or should I move him to 21 Nov when the obits first appeared? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:41, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some hours later: same question. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:22, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Wilko Johnson

[edit]
Article: Wilko Johnson (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Sky News, THR
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: More sources needed. Looks good now. Sunshineisles2 (talk) 18:06, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment There is one spot in prose that has a cn tag and discography is mostly unsourced. I don't want to !oppose, as 95% of the article is fine, but the discography needs to be sourced. Curbon7 (talk) 03:28, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(closed) Saudi Arabia beat Argentina

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2022 FIFA World Cup Group C (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Saud Arabia defeat Argentina 2-1 in one of the biggest upsets in FIFA World Cup's history. (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:
Nominator's comments: A shocking result that re-writes football history and defies all expectations favouring Argentina before the tournament. --Stop racism immediately (talk) 13:07, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As we have the ongoing, there is no need to post any individual game result, regardless of how "shocking" the result may have been. Masem (t) 13:12, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
* Oppose, Snow Close Extremely minor match, not at all reported. 𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 ☎️ 📄 14:01, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. A unique, beautiful and historic victory that made many people happy, but which, unfortunately, cannot go to ITN. But thank you so much for bringing it here and reminding us once again of this wonderful moment. :) MSN12102001 (talk) 14:05, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2022 Anyang factory fire

[edit]
Article: 2022 Anyang factory fire (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: A factory fire has killed at least 38 people and two others injured in Anyang, central China. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ At least 38 people die and two others are injured in a factory fire in Anyang, China.
News source(s): AL Jazeera, The Guardian, CNN, CGTN, BBC
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Need expansion. Ainty Painty (talk) 09:36, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Awful tragedy, notable enough for ITN. Article definitely needs expansion before it can go up, only four or five sentences atm. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 10:25, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Article is WAY too short for main page posting. Probably needs a 4x to 5x expansion to be main page ready. --Jayron32 14:10, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. No reason to believe this is anything other than a run of the mill tragedy. Even fires that engulf whole towns are relatively common and not immediately newsworthy. I'm not convinced this even meets event notability guidelines. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 15:35, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, Article is poor. Alex-h (talk) 17:19, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support on event notability. However, oppose on article quality, needs to be lengthened & expanded before posting on ITN. SBS6577P (talk) 10:49, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose on quality. The article needs to be expanded thoroughly. Vida0007 (talk) 19:34, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support on notability, but oppose on article quality. Nobody seems to be working on it. Schwede66 23:33, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Jeremy Lloyds

[edit]
Article: Jeremy Lloyds (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: English cricketer and umpire, I've expanded a bit from the obituaries. Death date not stated but announced on 21 November - Dumelow (talk) 20:15, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I added "all-rounder" and his playing dates - Dumelow (talk) 22:51, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Earthquake in Java

[edit]
Article: 2022 West Java earthquake (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ A 5.6 magnitude earthquake kills at least 56 people in Java, Indonesia. (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Breaking news so updates are awaited. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:39, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Sebastian Vettel retirement from Formula One

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Article: Sebastian Vettel (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Four-time Formula One world champion Sebastian Vettel retires from the sport after 15 seasons and 300 Grand Prix entries. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Four-time world champion Sebastian Vettel retires from Formula One.
News source(s): BBC, Motorsport.com
Credits:
Nominator's comments: Sebastian Vettel is one of only five people in the history of Formula 1 to win four or more world championships, has raced for a very long time, and is now retiring from the sport. Chrill (talk) 01:11, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This type of comment is unhelpful. --RockstoneSend me a message! 04:27, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2022 Kazakh presidential election

[edit]
Proposed image
Articles: 2022 Kazakh presidential election (talk · history · tag) and Kassym-Jomart Tokayev (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev wins reelection bid in the 2022 Kazakh presidential election following constitutional amendments in extending presidential term to seven years. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Kassym-Jomart Tokayev is a reelected as Kazakhstan's president for a second 7-year term following the January 2022 unrest and the constitutional referendum.
Alternative blurb II: Kassym-Jomart Tokayev wins snap election to serve for another seven-year term as Kazakhstan's president following the events of January 2022 and the constitutional referendum.
Alternative blurb III: Kassym-Jomart Tokayev is declared winner of the 2022 Kazakh presidential election following unrest in January and the constitutional referendum.
News source(s): DW, SCMP, Reuters
Credits:

 ShadZ01 (talk) 00:57, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support altblurb - Typos need to be fixed, but notable event. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 12:56, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Presidential election, I would go with alternative blurb.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cherrell410 (talkcontribs) 02:29, 2022 November 20 (UTC)
  • Oppose This is orange-tagged for good reason; it needs extensive copy-editing. This is a big job because the page is huge. But it doesn't actually have a section with the results, let alone prose about them. To find out what actually happened, I looked at the news coverage. There's nothing on my usual sources of BBC and NYT so I read the report on Al Jazeera which seems quite good. The incumbent won by a landslide, of course, and it's amusing that the runner-up was "against everyone".
BTW, Al Jazeera also reports how the name change of the capital to Nursultan worked out. That was nominated in 2019 but we didn't run it. Just as well, the name has recently been changed back to Astana. "It holds the Guinness World Record for the city with the most name changes."
Andrew🐉(talk)
I think its worth noting that the OSCE didn't say that it was a sham election, nor did it record instances of voter suppression (as of the time of writing) - normally if elections are not free or fair, the OSCE would at least criticise how the elections were run - however OSCE's criticism for this election has been limited to lack of transparency of media ownership and how other candidates' campaigns were similar to (and indistinguishable from) Tokayev's. JaventheAldericky (talk) 20:21, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 20

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports


(Posted) RD: Mickey Kuhn

[edit]
Article: Mickey Kuhn (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Hollywood Reporter, The Telegraph
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Working on this page, looks ok. Nohomersryan (talk) 20:48, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Golden age actor, filmography is referenced. Kirill C1 (talk) 15:28, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 109th Grey Cup

[edit]
Article: 109th Grey Cup (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In the 109th Grey Cup, the Toronto Argonauts defeat the Winnipeg Blue Bombers 24-23. (Post)
Credits:

Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Canadian football's annual championship game, ITN/R. Article has already been updated and should be good. NorthernFalcon (talk) 20:21, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) RD: Jason David Frank

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Jason David Frank (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): AP
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: star of the Power Rangers Thriley (talk) 22:39, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) RD: Hebe de Bonafini

[edit]
Article: Hebe de Bonafini (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Clarin
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 gobonobo + c 20:56, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Greg Bear

[edit]
Article: Greg Bear (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Gizmodo
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Sci-fi author Blaylockjam10 (talk) 12:48, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) FIFA World Cup opening ceremony

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Articles: 2022 FIFA World Cup (talk · history · tag) and 2022 FIFA World Cup opening ceremony (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The 2022 edition of the FIFA World Cup has opened in Qatar. (Post)
News source(s): Al Jazera, BBC, The Guardian, Daily Mail
Credits:
 Ainty Painty (talk) 15:28, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
We do not post the opening ceremony of the world cup - either its ongoing or the final result. Masem (t) 15:51, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Already covered in Ongoing. We will post the final result. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 18:50, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2022 United Nations Climate Change Conference

[edit]
Article: 2022 United Nations Climate Change Conference (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The 27th Conference of Parties of the UNFCCC closes with major nations agreeing to a global loss and damage fund for poor nations impacted by climate change. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The COP27 conference closes with an agreement to compensate poor nations for climate change loss and damage.
Alternative blurb II: ​ At the 27th Conference of Parties of the UNFCCC, the first loss and damage fund is agreed upon.
News source(s): The Guardian, CNN, AP
BBC (for alt1)
Credits:

Article needs updating

Nominator's comments: The article hasn't yet been updated with this news, but it is what is being called a landmark negotiation of the major countries there. Masem (t) 06:03, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Ongoing: FIFA World Cup

[edit]
Article: 2022 FIFA World Cup (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Starts in about 7 hours (4pm UTC), posted ongoing in 2018echidnaLives - talk - edits 08:34, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak support Gigantic sporting event lasting almost one month. Hundreds of car horns go off at night when I'm trying to sleep. My concerns are the nine citation needed tags. ~~ lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 10:21, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I don’t think anything other than the Olympics deserves a place in ongoing. The FIFA World Cup is a tournament in a single sport featuring national teams from only 32 countries that play to win a single set of medals. Ongoing exists as a practical tool for events that may require posting multiple blurbs, and it is more suited for events with multiple disciplines and thereby multiple sets of medals awarded on a daily basis. I don’t think that any game other than the final of this tournament would merit a blurb, so it’s better to wait until it ends and post the conclusion with the winning team. I’d say that even the world championships in athletics and swimming, whose formats allow participation by almost all countries and feature major developments every day, are a better fit. This has nothing to do with popularity but with the practical use of ongoing.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:39, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    The World Cup was one of the events in mind when the Ongoing aspect was proposed. Masem (t) 13:37, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    We used to post a sticky with an Olympic summary even before Ongoing was considered. Its introduction was inspired by a sticky posted for the Arab Spring.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:45, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Support The tournament is the culmination of a competition in which 206 national teams entered. Other than Olympics most watched sporting event. Of global interest, even for those who didn’t qualify. yorkshiresky (talk) 15:46, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't think it's relevant if it's watched by 4 billion people (I watch almost every match regularly, so what?). The point is that the format of this competition is incompatible with Ongoing. Unlike the Olympics, at which there are notable events with world records in different sports that would merit a blurb every day, the matches played at this tournament are chiefly qualifying events for the final.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:01, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - I'd rather we just post the final result. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 10:54, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Sporting tournaments are ongoing by nature, but not in a manner that warrants posting as such. We'd get laughed out of the building if we proposed making the NCAA Men's Basketball tournament into an ongoing item. 🌈WaltCip-(talk) 14:51, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The NCAA basketball tournament is like a mini-league, not a single (ongoing) event, and involves mid-tier amateur athletes of one country. It's nothing alike, of course it would SNOW quickly. Kingsif (talk) 15:50, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
64 teams play 1 game, the 32 winners play 1 game, the 16 winners play 1 game, the 8 winners play 1 game, the 4 winners play 1 game, the 2 winners play 1 game, lose at any time and can't even play anymore that year. Nothing like a league. Like the knockdown stage of the World Cup tournament but 4 times more teams. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 13:57, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So like the UEFA Champions League format once it's down to 16. Kingsif (talk) 01:53, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above Editor 5426387 (talk) 18:59, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) 2022 Colorado Springs shooting

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2022 Colorado Springs shooting (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ At least five people are killed and eighteen people are injured in a mass shooting at a gay nightclub in Colorado Springs, Colorado. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The suspect in a mass shooting that killed five people at a gay nightclub in Colorado Springs, Colorado was charged with murder and hate crimes.
News source(s): AP NBC News US News
Credits:

Article needs updating
 User:Jgeorge20 (t) 12:28, 20 November 2022 (UTC) [reply]
This was a hate crime, giving it a distinction over other mass shootings that occur with similar casualty rates. I'm also not sure how you'd define extremely high body counts. Double digits? Triple digits? 🌈WaltCip-(talk) 14:48, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
For the US? High double digits. We posted the Orlando night club shooting with near 50 killed. I think that was reasonable. Hate crime is neither here nor there. The lives lost here are no more sacred than the five people murdered last month in Raleigh NC. We are not here to promote causes, and special victims. See WP:RGW. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:00, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think the point is that a hate crime mass killing would raise it above the "commonplace." Pawnkingthree (talk) 15:11, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Precisely. Ad Orientem wanted to know how this was not commonplace. I gave a reason. I'm not trying to right great wrongs. I'm explaining why this is different from other mass shootings that are not considered newsworthy. 🌈WaltCip-(talk) 15:15, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hate crimes= special causes/special victims= WP:RGW. Beyond which, no motive has been established per Masem, though that is a reasonable suspicion. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:11, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If posting a shooting at a gay club is "RGW" (and I disagree with that, I think it makes it more newsworthy in keeping with the gay- and drag-panic from the Republican Party that has played out this year, with Libs of TikTok attacking the bar after the shooting), then what should we consider lumping two different shootings with different motivations and circumstances together when we should evaluate each separate situation independently? – Muboshgu (talk) 17:18, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have looked at this and concluded that if we exclude promoting special causes/people, there is nothing particularly significant about this in a country where mass shootings occur with greater frequency than my stopping at a gas station. Further, the death toll in this incident appears to be on the average side for American mass shootings. The issue is not motive. Every murder has a motive and every murder is appalling. The issue is commonality. You are of course, free to disagree. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:38, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Then I guess we're at an impasse. 🌈WaltCip-(talk) 14:26, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comparing a shooting with no known motive to a shooting at an LGBT club that was scheduled to host a drag brunch tomorrow is a mistake. Not every mass shooting in the U.S. gets nominated, so we're in no risk of being overrun by these noms. We have to weigh their merits independently rather than just dismiss them if they're not "extreme". – Muboshgu (talk) 16:51, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
fwiw, motive has yet to be clearly established, though the Occum's Razor lineup of the situation would suggest that it is obviously a hate crime against the LGBTQ+ community. Masem (t) 15:13, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The cause for pretty much every shooting rampage is the gunman's hatred for a certain group of people, be they co-workers, co-students, teachers, policemen, women, blacks, whites, Asians, Jews, Muslims, Christians etc. I fail to see how this particular shooting becomes more noteworthy, just because the victims happened to be part of the LGBTQ+ community. By US standards the death toll is not that high and this is merely one more in a litany of similar cases, so it is safe to say that it will be forgotten quickly by anyone not directly affected. Lord Gøn (talk) 21:43, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm confused user:Crazytales. How is a trans person shooting up a queer nightclub on the eve of Transgender Day of Remembrance related to far-right anti-queer media outlets? Can you explain further the basis for your support here? Nfitz (talk) 04:09, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Many media outlets "foreign" to the USA customise their content for the location of the reader, so seeing this in sites like the BBC from within the USA doesn't prove much at all. HiLo48 (talk) 06:55, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
International notability doesn't have to be proven. All that needs to be proven is that the item is significant and newsworthy. No qualifiers. 🌈WaltCip-(talk) 14:32, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Who has decided it's right wing terrorism? HiLo48 (talk) 09:39, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It very clearly is. It's not a high bar to pass.
It is even being investigated as a hate crime - a step further than simply being right-wing terrorism. 73.229.27.91 (talk) 16:59, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
He has been charged with 5 counts of murder, and 5 counts of 'committing a bias-motivated crime causing bodily injury'.
The event fits the criteria for right-wing terrorism as it's defined in that page. 73.229.27.91 (talk) 23:51, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
While, User:WaltCip there may not be a hard number, it's below the death threshold for a Denver mass shooting - let alone the State of Colorado or that entire country. There were three bigger shootings in that locality in the last 20 months. Nfitz (talk) 20:17, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not seeing anything User:Muboshgu that makes it notable. What do you see is notable about it? There seems to be claims it's a hate crime - but I don't see any evidence for that. Nfitz (talk) 04:09, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

November 19

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

Politics and elections

Science and technology


RD: Tuan Tuan

[edit]
Article: Tuan Tuan and Yuan Yuan (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Count Iblis (talk) 12:48, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2021 Rugby League World Cup (delayed to 2022)

[edit]
Article: 2021 Rugby League World Cup (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In rugby league, the World Cup concludes with Australia winning the men's tournament and the women's tournament, and England winning the wheelchair tournament. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In rugby league, Australia men, Australia women, and England wheelchair team win the World Cup.
Credits:

The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Posted only once before for the 2013 WC (as per its ITN/C). 2017 nom went stale. Updated content found under relevant sections in the bolded article. I preferred the overview article to update/bold over individual final articles because 1) it only exists for the men's so far, 2) general article quality, 3) for the sake of tidiness in the blurb. On a side note, we might as well change the recurring item to when Australia win... Nominated by James Lewis Bedford (talk) 18:43, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support, just. The singular main article has had table updates, the non-bold links to the event tournaments have had more update (tables and lead text). As we typically post the finals, once there is an article for the women's final (wheelchair has one, too!), perhaps the "tournament" words and links can be changed to "final". Per ITN talk discussion, I am satisfied that the whole World Cup is ITN/R. Kingsif (talk) 19:04, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    The event tournaments have no prose about the updated content as per WP:ITNCRIT (i.e. content about the finals), whilst the main article does. Final articles have both been bolded or left out at different times and there is no WP:ITNSPORTS guidance on this except that "generally, the specific event article for that year/time period is the target article in the blurb". Tennis very rarely has separate final articles and I think given the similar men/women/multiple winners in this item it works better without going overkill with the bold links. Comment by James Lewis Bedford (talk) 19:40, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I was going to say I had seen no prose update at the main article, but now I see it's at the top of the tournament sections. It's also more editorial in tone than I'd like. Perhaps spreading the prose through the relevant stages of each tournament, and making it "blander" for want of a better word, could help if you don't want to link finals. FWIW, I was not suggesting bolding them, just replacing the "Australia wins the men's tournament" with "Australia wins the men's final" etc., if you're just worried about bold links. Not that three bold links is more than we've had in one blurb before. Kingsif (talk) 19:46, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think spreading the updated content to the relevant stage in the subsection (e.g. knockout stage) only moves anything from the top of the section to the bottom (which isn't that far apart anyway) and changes its structure from prose–>tables to prose–>tables–>prose, but I'm indifferent to it. It's not an awful lot of prose and just provides more descriptive detail about the tables that will follow. Comment by James Lewis Bedford (talk) 20:02, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@JamesLewisBedford01: wrote something about the organisation of the prose and not linking the finals articles instead a few comments above. Guess he'll also have some insight about the TBA's? Kingsif (talk) 01:49, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry @Thryduulf, I don't follow. There is no clickable "final" subsection for the tournaments in question. There is a knock-out phase section which is the closest thing to it and just above it in the prose under the tournament headers there is prose for the final which constitutes basically the majority of the section. After checking, there are three "TBA"s out of thirteen (hardly swathes) in the broadcasting section. I'll now fix it or just remove it if there are no updates not that I think it is detrimental to the ITN/Criteria. None of these issues raised seems to effect ITN/C and are just styling/general article improvement issues that any editor may wish to quickly fix themselves. Comment by James Lewis Bedford (talk) 06:35, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I follow the link to the bolded article, look at the TOC, see the apparently most relevant section is called "knockout stage", click on it and all I see is a table, so I scroll up and see more tables and then a block of prose about the whole competition that I have to look through to find information about the final - I shouldn't have to go hunting. It isn't a "styling" issue but an article layout issue and not being able to find prose about the finale where nearly two decades of reading Wikipedia articles has taught me to look for prose about the finals is significant enough for me to stand-by my opposition. The TBAs, while not a reason to oppose on their own, did need improving and while there may only have been three they represented by far the greatest amount of screen estate in that column. Thryduulf (talk) 12:01, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Tariq Teddy

[edit]
Article: Tariq Teddy (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Dunya News, Daily Pakistan
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Ainty Painty (talk) 16:49, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 2022 Malaysian general election

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: 2022 Malaysian general election (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The 15th Malaysian general election concludes with a hung parliament, with Anwar Ibrahim (picture shown), leader of the Alliance of Hope, sworn in as the new prime minister of Malaysia. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Anwar Ibrahim (picture shown), leader of the Alliance of Hope, becomes Malaysia's 10th prime minister after the general election resulted in the nation's first hung parliament.
News source(s): MalaysiaKini, FMT, Bloomberg
Credits:
Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Article is presentable, albeit with the occasional typewriting errors. The blurb however, will be updated until the official results are completely released (expected within 6 hours after this post is first made). Recent events fully indicate that Anwar Ibrahim will be the new Prime Minister of Malaysia under the directives of the King of Malaysia. gavre (al. PenangLion) (talk) 18:16, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 18

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

Law and crime

Science and technology

Sports


(Posted) RD: Dwight Garner (American football)

[edit]
Article: Dwight Garner (American football) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): East Bay Times
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Involved in The Play in California's game-winning kick return over Stanford in 1982. —Bagumba (talk) 11:37, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leap seconds abolished

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: Leap second (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The General Conference on Weights and Measures votes to preclude the addition of leap seconds between the years 2035 and 2135. (Post)
News source(s): NYT
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: Some more science news. Davey2116 (talk) 21:02, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Caution: for a start the proposed wording is terrible ("preclude the addition" ???). But more importantly, are we sure that (a) the 2135 date is correct [other sources don't mention it] and (b) that the decision is the last word (Nature doesn't think so.) BTW, do we show the source? because the NYT requires a subscription. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 00:47, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • The process is ad hoc because it's based on observations. There hasn't been a leap second for a while because the Earth is currently running fast and it seems they don't want to remove a leap second from UTC because it has not been done before and is technically problematic. Note that the word "addition" should not be used in the blurb for this reason as there might be subtraction too. Andrew🐉(talk)

(ATTENTION needed!) RD: Tabassum

[edit]
Article: Tabassum (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NDTV
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Indian actress and talk show host. Ktin (talk) 16:41, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Ned Rorem

[edit]
Article: Ned Rorem (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Washington Post
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: U.S. composer of operas, songs, song cycles, orchestral music, Pulitzer Prize for Music winner. We need more refs, but I trust that it will happen over the next days. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:12, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Refs should be all good now. Aza24 (talk) 10:28, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) LATAM Perú Flight 2213

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Article: LATAM Perú Flight 2213 (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Two people are killed as LATAM Perú Flight 2213 (aircraft involved pictured) collides with a fire engine on take-off from Jorge Chávez International Airport, Lima. (Post)
News source(s): The Aviation Herald
Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: There are no WP:MINIMUMDEATHS. Unusual cause - runway incursion by emergency services. Mjroots (talk) 08:10, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Pulled) New metric prefixes

[edit]
Article: Metric prefix (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The International System of Units officially recognizes the metric prefixes quetta-, ronna-, ronto-, and quecto-. (Post)
News source(s): [16], New Scientist, Guardian, Nature, LA Times
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Some interesting science news. New prefixes have been proposed for many years but just got officially recognized. 75.236.212.109 (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The metric system bureau wants to immunize against one of the unofficial ones like a "brontobyte" (brontosaurus dinosaur) and a hellabyte (a hell of a lot of bytes, "hella" is also a common slang in parts of West USA meaning "very") from becoming too popular to stop. In 2026 ~221 zettabytes (0.221 yottabytes) of data will be created so it might be a quarter ronnabytes and 2 ronnabits per year by 2046 (if technological singularity doesn't happen) so companias are going to start to want a prefix bigger than yotta soon for long-term plans. They should've picked better ones: Quetta is a city and ronna is ugly: it's a first name like Sue, it looks like 'rona (coronavirus), it doesn't look enough like the Latin or Greek for 9 that it's derived from (to ease memory, as almost anyone interested in STEM knows what the Latin and Greek words for small counting numbers mean) and they could've called it xenna- and xento- instead which would fit the memory-aiding trends better: (xennabit=10009 (ennea=Greek for 9), yottabit (okto=Greek for 8), zettabit (hepta=Greek for 7), exabit (hex=Greek for 6), petabit (pente=Greek for 5), terabit (tettares=Greek for 4, teras=Greek for monster) gigabit (gigas=Greek for giant), megabit (megas=Greek for big), then some that end in the wrong vowel cause they're literally thousand, thousandth etc in Greek and Latin, then i.e. microgram (mikros=Greek for small), nanogram (nanos=Greek for dwarf), picogram (pico=Spanish for speck), femtogram (femten=Danish for 15 (10-15)), attogram (atten=Danish for 18), zeptogram, yoctogram, xennogram (still heavier than an electron, though not by much. Neutrinos are much lighter). Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 23:47, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
X was rejected for use because it looks too much like the multiplication sign. Double sharp (talk) 23:47, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's 'encyclopedic' in the sense that encyclopedias will use these terms. It's not actually news in its own right. GenevieveDEon (talk) 23:39, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Sentencing of Elizabeth Holmes

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Article: Elizabeth Holmes (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Elizabeth Holmes (pictured) is sentenced to 135 months in prison for fraud committed at Theranos. (Post)
News source(s): CNBC
Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: I don't expect this to be posted, but (1) it doesn't seem that Elizabeth Holmes/Theranos were ever nominated here, and (2) it's a significant case with wide public interest. United States v. Elizabeth A. Holmes, et al. may be a better target. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:21, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) RD: Muhammad Rafi Usmani

[edit]
Article: Muhammad Rafi Usmani (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Daily Pakistan]
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Prominent scholar of Pakistan. Deserves a mention. All sourced. ─ The Aafī (talk) 16:56, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gaza fire

[edit]
Article: 2022 Jabalia fire (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ At least 21 people are killed in a fire at a residential building in Jabalia, Gaza Strip. (Post)
News source(s): CNN Reuters Khaleej Times
Credits:

Article needs updating

Nominator's comments: Wide coverage, but article needs expansion. Quantum XYZ (chat) 10:58, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Article needs expansion, only three paragraphs, but the event is notable. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 12:08, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per recent talk. This seems to be a minor news item which is less prominent than numerous other current stories (Qatar, Twitter, UK budget, &c.) We should not give it undue weight just because there's a death toll. For another fire, see Iran.
Note also that this happened in Palestine but the nominating account only has 229 edits and the first supporter only has 123 edits. I'm not sure of the exact EC constraints in such cases but it's another reason for caution. See other recent talk.
Andrew🐉(talk) 13:55, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
To the best of my knowledge, ARBPIA doesn't extend to discussions external to the articles themselves, though it may be a good idea to issue the standard notice. Anarchyte (talk) 15:32, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It would apply, but I see nothing conflict related in the article. Internal Palestinian or internal Israeli topics are not by default Arab-Israeli conflict topics. nableezy - 17:30, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Why does my edit count particularily matter in this? I based my decision off of precedent, which is that similar sized disasters have been posted before. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 16:10, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Some topics such as Israel/Palestine are restricted in this way -- see recent discussion. Andrew🐉(talk) 19:11, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The restriction is on topics related broadly to the conflict between Israel and Palestine, not all topics related to Israel or Palestine. As there's clearly no Israel involvement here, this is just an event that relates to Palestine only and thus is not restricted by the ARBCOM case. Masem (t) 19:40, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just one correction, it is applied to the wider Arab-Israeli conflict, of which the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a (major) component, but the rest of this is spot on. nableezy - 20:27, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As I understand it, this fire was due to large quantities of gasoline being stored in the house. That's something that's illegal here in the UK because it's a fire hazard. The reason this is done in Gaza is because many households have to run their own generator. The reason this is done is because the electrical grid is unreliable. And that's because Israel has been keeping Gaza under siege since Hamas took over. Right? So, if it wasn't for the conflict, the fire would not have happened. So, that's a connection and the policy is so broadly construed that the article Gaza Strip, where this happened, is subject to ECP, along with Blockade of the Gaza Strip, History of the Palestinians, Governance of the Gaza Strip, &c. Q.E.D. Andrew🐉(talk) 20:32, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Again, internal Palestinian and internal Israeli topics are not related to the conflict. If you have to take that many leaps then no it is not in the ARBPIA topic area anymore than it is related to Adam and Eve. nableezy - 20:57, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The governments of Gaza and Israel don't agree, "Officials from Hamas, the militant group that runs Gaza, pinned the blame for the deaths on Israel’s 15-year blockade imposed on the coastal enclave, which has banned the import of certain equipment and machinery, hobbling the capability of emergency responders. ... Israel’s civil administration, which controls the civilian aspects of Israel’s presence in the occupied territories, including Gaza and the West Bank, said Hamas’ accusation was an effort to evade responsibility. Rather than establishing civil and medical infrastructure in Gaza, Hamas “has invested its resources in strengthening itself militarily in order to manufacture rockets and missiles which it launches at innocent Israeli civilian populations,” the administration said in a statement."NYT Andrew🐉(talk) 08:55, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Still, I think this is a loose connection, rather than an explicit part of the conflict. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 10:34, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
For the benefit of the new editors, they should understand that the sanction is "broadly construed", which means that "if there is any plausible dispute over whether DS applies in a specific case ... that is normally taken to mean that it does". So, it's safest to assume the worst. Andrew🐉(talk) 13:50, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I do get your point, and that this conversation is being had with good faith, but I just don't see how this article is controversial. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 17:11, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Adding an uninvolved-in-the-area comment that I also think it is clear this is not ARBPIA-related, to try to tamp out that issue so the discussion can center on support/oppose. No opinion about whether to put it in ITN or not. --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:07, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This has nothing to do with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, though? It was an isolated fire. I get why posts like these would be locked to newcomers, but I don't see how this subject is controversial in any way. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 10:33, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Don't talk about the purée!
This is Wikipedia where editors can and do argue about anything. The classic example in this context is hummus (right), which is subject to WP:ARBPIA too. Andrew🐉(talk) 14:05, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Except nobody is arguing this but you, and two uninvolved admins have both said this is not in the conflict. Its literally you saying one thing, and every other person who has commented saying the opposite. Its not in the topic, it does not have a talk page notice, it is not extended confirmed, it does not have an edit notice. You can keep bringing up other articles that have (portions) of them in the topic area, but there is wide agreement that this one is not. I believe we call that consensus on Wikipedia. nableezy - 16:12, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support once updated - This is significant enough. The answer to lack of coverage of "bad news" stories is not to stop posting those stories. The answer is to go out and nominate those other events you feel are newsworthy and meritorious. It's pointless to try and alter our general criteria based on one-off complaints, because someone is always going to find a reason to complain about something. Too much sports, too many award shows, not enough coverage of wars or disasters in other countries. --🌈WaltCip-(talk) 14:17, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    There's an NEVENT factor here. This is a domestic fire started by the owners storing gasoline in their home. Tragic but avoidable and unlikely to lead to long-term coverage. Contrast this to the Grenfell Tower fire where the rapidness of the first was quickly pinned on how the building was constructed, and thus has had long-term effects (investigation, lawsuits, etc.) That clearly passes NEVENT. Masem (t) 16:57, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Fair enough, but my counter-argument is that this is an underrepresented region on ITN, and any efforts we can make at combating systemic bias is worthwhile, even if in this case it's a disaster or tragedy. 🌈WaltCip-(talk) 19:45, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Fully agree we want to avoid systematic bias, but that should not be at the cost of accepting poor quality or less significant news items that just happen to get a burst of coverage. Not trying to evoke "don't complain about being in one country", but if this exact same event happened in the US or UK, it might get a larger burst of coverage but wouldn't be news we post due to accidental house fires being very common. Masem (t) 22:27, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose for now – Subject is promising, but the article is not of sufficient quality for ITN. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 14:18, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Currently, the article is a stub, so it doesn't qualify. As far as notability, I'm on the fence as to whether it warrants inclusion for ITN. Is there a reason why this is a major event rather than just a run-of-the-mill tragedy? Thebiguglyalien (talk) 21:24, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Because it was written about in all major outlets - BBC [17], Washington Post [18], Reuters [19], Al Jazeera [20]. Kirill C1 (talk) 20:52, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The article explains in the popular culture section why hummus is such a contentious topic. This doesn't apply here. 🌈WaltCip-(talk) 16:08, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That article only has 'confirmed' protection, not 'extended confirmed' PrecariousWorlds (talk) 17:02, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 17

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime


(Posted) RD: Fred Brooks

[edit]
Article: Fred Brooks (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Mastodon golem.de, UNC
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: He was the progenitor of the 8 bit byte, manager of the team that developed System/360, and the writer of The Mythical Man-Month. -- RockstoneSend me a message! 22:19, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Staughton Lynd

[edit]
Article: Staughton Lynd (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Vindicator
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American conscientious objector, Quaker, peace activist and civil rights activist, historian, professor, author, and lawyer. Thriley (talk) 08:46, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Azio Corghi

[edit]
Article: Azio Corghi (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): giornaledellamusica.it
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Italian composer mostly of literature operas which were performed at La Scala and in Germany. Composition teacher in Rome and at other academies. - His article was short. I smiled when I saw that 3 of his operas were premiered at a house where I'll see an opera tomorrow. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:18, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We have a newspaper ref now for his death, only I can't access it. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:22, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Corriere della Sera (in Italian): "Morto Azio Corghi, da Torino alla Scala alla collaborazione con Saramago: addio al compositore e musicologo" I can access. Grimes2 (talk) 16:41, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I found another news, accessible and detailed. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:15, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Shettima Mustafa

[edit]
Article: Shettima Mustafa (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Nigerian Independent
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Former Nigerian cabinet minister. I've done a basic update and quick reference - Dumelow (talk) 20:54, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking Curbon7, I've expanded the lead a bit - Dumelow (talk) 08:43, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Michael Gerson

[edit]
Article: Michael Gerson (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Washington Post
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Thriley (talk) 17:23, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Aleksandr Gorshkov (figure skater)

[edit]
Article: Aleksandr Gorshkov (figure skater) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): mk.ru
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Russian figure skater. Article appears to be in good shape. Curbon7 (talk) 13:44, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Carolina Ödman-Govender

[edit]
Article: Carolina Ödman-Govender (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): African Astronomical Society
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Notable astronomer Mike Peel (talk) 07:38, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cape Argus source: "passed away at the age of 48". This means 1973 or 1974. Grimes2 (talk) 17:53, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Pulled) United States House and Senate Elections

[edit]
Articles: 2022 United States Senate elections (talk · history · tag) and 2022 United States House of Representatives elections (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The Democratic Party retains their majority in the United States Senate, while the Republican Party gains a majority in the United States House of Representatives. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In the United States, the Republican Party wins a majority in the United States House of Representatives.
Alternative blurb II: ​ The Republican Party wins a majority in the United States House of Representatives.
News source(s): AP News NBC News
Credits:

Article needs updating
One or both nominated events are listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: The House has now been called by AP News. Should bump this blurb back up (like we did with Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak). -- RockstoneSend me a message! 00:29, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support altblurb II - Already blurbed the senate a few days ago. Apart from that, obviously notable. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 12:26, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What exactly needs to be added to the article. What non-subjective (eg doesnt seem that useful) criteria needs to be met? nableezy - 01:53, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The answer is nothing. There's a different standard for American articles, apparently. --RockstoneSend me a message! 03:05, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
To get on ITN with the bolded link, the article needs to be well updated. A near-empty results table is not good enough, no matter if it's American or related to any other country. Having an orange tag for sourcing problems is another reason to not have this on ITN. Please fix the article. --PFHLai (talk) 03:48, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The results are not final yet. That is why there is no results table. The news however is that the House of Representatives has a new Republican majority. That is already there. nableezy - 04:10, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
We can't add results -- they're not final yet. All we know is that the GOP will have a majority in the House. That's the important thing. There's nothing to fix on the article. This pull should really be reverted. --RockstoneSend me a message! 05:34, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The wikipage is also orange-tagged for inadequate sourcing. The "Open seats that changed parties" section and the several sections after that have very few footnotes. --PFHLai (talk) 06:20, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes of course, because this quality of article is so clearly better than the quality of the ITN/R article that it belonged on the front page within minutes of the announced resignation of the PM of the Western world's least stable plutocracy. nableezy - 18:32, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see any difference between that article and the one that was just pulled in terms of quality. Hopefully this gets restored soon. I don't think calling the UK government a "plutocracy" helps things though. --RockstoneSend me a message! 21:40, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
My understanding is they don't take to the House until January. The news reports here, about a day after the election, were clear that it was a narrow Republican victory in the house, but the Senate could go either way, based on what had already been counted. Which is when it was in the news. It's not in the news now ...perhaps even a week ago, it was still in the news - but the news has moved on. If it really wasn't clear to some media what the result was going to be weeks ago, the ITN blurb would be "election too close to call" - because that was the news story. Nfitz (talk) 07:03, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hang on - it looks like we already blurbed the election result 10 days ago ... but only mentioned the upper house. I'm not sure why there needs to be a second blurb for lower house ... and a week after the news all but stopped. ITNR doesn't call for having two blurbs for the unusual case of counting very slowly. Nfitz (talk) 07:10, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Nfitz: -- We did not know who had won the House until last week, the news was quite clear that although Republicans were expected to take the House, it was unexpectedly close and there was a chance that the Democrats would retain both the House and Senate. Anyway, the reason this was blurbed is for the same reason we blurbed both the resignation of Truss and Sunak's nomination. They were not separate blurbs, but we bumped the blurb about Truss back up and added information about Sunak, which is what I had initially proposed when nominating this, but everyone said "no" for some reason. It does feel like there's a different standard for American news items vs. the rest of the world here on Wikipedia, I don't get it. --RockstoneSend me a message! 08:22, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Then it's too close to count, was the blurb that should have been with the rest of the election result ... when it wasn't stale. I don't see a problem with bumping. At the same time, how is it different? Looking at other nations that have simultaneous bicameral elections, I can find only one blurb - such as for Australian Senate and Australian House of Representatives in the 2022 Australian federal election. It always feels to me like there is that many here do indeed think there's a different standard for American news items. In the last week alone from the USA we've had two nominations for relatively small shootings, another for an almost entirely unreported helicopter accident that killed only a couple of people, and a nomination for the fraud conviction of someone that didn't receive widespread coverage, and almost no one has heard of. Nfitz (talk) 06:21, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There is definitely a different standard when it comes to British politics, at least. I'm not sure how you can't see how bumping the blurb for the House is no different than than bumping the blurb for Sunak. Anyway, yes, people like to propose stories from the US to ITN that don't belong (although mass shootings are usually ITN, so you could argue they do.) That doesn't change my point that ITN often feels like UKpedia. --RockstoneSend me a message! 17:28, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose restore Lack of prose summary of the results, chronic problem for election articles nominated here, not specific to this nomination. SpencerT•C 04:21, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Still not ready. The sections with orange tags still haven't been fixed up. Please actually resolve the problem rather than removing the tags. There is a table now, although it has a citation needed tag in it,not sure what for. Plus, as Spencer says, a short summary of results in prose would be in order. This page is already a somewhat unsightly mess of statistical trivia, but at least getting the basics in place is necessary before reposting.  — Amakuru (talk) 08:43, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 16

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

International relations

Law and crime

Science and technology


(Posted) RD: Carol Leigh

[edit]
Article: Carol Leigh (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): San Francisco Chronicle, Washington Post
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: aka Scarlot Harlot, sex worker (coined that term) and SW rights activist Mignof (talk | contribs) 22:17, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Michael Pertschuk

[edit]
Article: Michael Pertschuk (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): FTC statement
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Member of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) from 1977 to 1984, and served as FTC Chair from 1977 to 1981. Thriley (talk) 05:12, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Robert Clary

[edit]
Article: Robert Clary (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NY Post
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Last surviving original cast member from Hogan's Heros. Referencing needs some work for which I've tagged the page. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:38, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 15

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Politics and elections

Sports


(Posted) RD: Frida (dog)

[edit]
Article: Frida (dog) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): El Financiero
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Mexican rescue dog. Article has some references but is not fully updated yet. –FlyingAce✈hello 00:23, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support Now adequately expanded. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:15, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) 2022 missile explosion in Poland

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2022 missile explosion in Poland (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ At least two people are killed after Russian missiles strike the Polish village of Przewodów. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ At least two people are killed after Russian missiles cross into Poland and strike the village of Przewodów.
Alternative blurb II: ​ At least two people are killed after Russian-made missiles strike the Polish village of Przewodów.
News source(s): AP, Bloomberg News
Credits:
Nominator's comments: Poland is a NATO member state, and this has not only propelled its Prime Minister into an emergency meeting, but also raised concerns about a possible invocation of Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty. Currently there isn't too much prose in the article itself, but the very implications behoove me to open a floor for us nonetheless. aeromachinator (talk to me here) 19:20, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Number of sources have mentioned that both Polish and US officials have confirmed it. Very significant in the war, since as Kip said, it is a (likely accidental) strike on a non-combatant. Awhahoo (talk) 19:38, 15 November 2022 (UTC)(non-ec !vote struck)[reply]
  • Because two people being killed, while tragic for their families and friends, isnt quite on the level of being on the front page of Wikipedia. Chicago, for example, has averaged two people killed a day so far this month. nableezy - 21:13, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
this stuff is crap 69.75.169.38 (talk) 01:49, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support - This won't cause World War III, but an attack on a NATO country, if accidental, by a foreign adversary is huge news, and has been the top story of every site. This has escalated the war. I would add that it might be good to specify that the missiles were stray, as the blurb could be mistaken for saying Russian missiles directly attacked Poland, when that is likely not what happened. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 00:45, 16 November 2022 (UTC) [reply]
Also omit 'Russian', as we currently do not know where the missiles came from(even if Russia is a likely source) PrecariousWorlds (talk) 00:50, 16 November 2022 (UTC)(non-ec !vote struck)[reply]
  • Oppose For now this is a minor cross border military incident, of the sort that occurs from time to time in conflicts. But keeping an eye on it. If things escalate, I will reconsider. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:48, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support but wait. Even if it was an accident, indeed this is a serious incident to a sovereignty country that isn't at war. However, I'll wait how the Polish/NATO officials will respond. Layah50♪ ( 話して~! ) 01:16, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. I'm favorable to a blurb that stays neutral on responsibility or reason. This is news, IMO, even if accidental and regardless of who did it. I would favor a blurb that notes the strike and keeps it there until we get more news and wish to update the blurb. DarkSide830 (talk) 02:08, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support although this may appear to be a minor incident, it is incidents like this that lead to some sort of conflict, even another potential world war. major escalation in the war. Editor 5426387 (talk) 02:24, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) Artemis 1

[edit]
Article: Artemis 1 (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ NASA's Artemis 1 launches to the Moon successfully. (Post)
Alternative blurb: NASA's uncrewed Artemis 1 test flight launches to the Moon successfully.
News source(s): CBS Reuters
Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: I am nominating this early to allow editors to give it a checkup. Pretty high chances it will actually launch on Nov 16 1:04 a.m. EST, and wether it goes out in a big boom or actually does launch only like 7 years late, it will make the news round. ITNR cause it's the first launch of a major rocket family. 2A02:2F01:F206:A500:ACB9:80C1:561A:62A0 (talk) 16:06, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This nomination is premature. It is impossible to assess the update to the article before the event has occurred. I think this should be closed; come back if/when it actually launches. Modest Genius talk 16:23, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done with an altblurb and per the article infobox I have added "test flight" for clarity. I should add that for ITN purposes this term does not reduce the notability. Jusdafax (talk) 08:22, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -- Anarchyte, I've added a reference. — Nythar (💬-🎃) 09:31, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above Editor 5426387 (talk) 18:23, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Worldwide population exceeds 8B

[edit]
Article: World population (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The world population exceeds eight billion people, based on United Nation estimates. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The United Nations estimates the world population to have exceeded eight billion.
Alternative blurb II: ​ The United Nations estimates the world population to have exceeded eight billion.
News source(s): UN, USA Today, Reuters
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: The "Projections" section needs a few sources, but the article seems otherwise complete. This was actually in the news starting a few days ago, but I wanted to wait until this day, when the projection is said to cross 8B. There's some other interesting facts, such as India expected to exceed China by 2023, or that we are expected to peak around 10.5B ppl (due to reduced childbirth and impact of low-income regions) but I don't think we need much more on the blurb. Masem (t) 01:15, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Bit mixed on this one, but at the end of the day this is a huge milestone for humanity, if arbitrary. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 10:18, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Milestone in history of humanity, source seems reliable. Editor 5426387 (talk) 15:15, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 14

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime


(Posted) RD: Werner Franke

[edit]
Article: Werner Franke (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Süddeutsche Zeitung/dpa
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: German cell biologist and doping expert. Grimes2 (talk) 18:11, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Virginia McLaurin

[edit]
Article: Virginia McLaurin (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): WHUR
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American supercentenarian and "dancing grandma" - Dumelow (talk) 11:01, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Willie Donald

[edit]
Article: Willie Donald (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Press and Journal
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Scottish cricketer and cricket administator. I've done a little work on the article but it looks pretty good. Date of death not known but announced today - Dumelow (talk) 16:25, 14 November 2022 (UTC) Dumelow (talk) 16:25, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 13

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports


(Posted) RD: Geoff Cochrane

[edit]
Article: Geoff Cochrane (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [25]
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: The date of death hasn't been publicly reported yet as far as I can tell, but the article on The Spinoff was published today (14 November, NZ time) and the first tweets reporting his death were published 13 November (eg this tweet from his former publicist, this tweet from Victoria University's writing programme). Chocmilk03 (talk) 07:29, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 2022 Slovenian elections

[edit]
Proposed image
Articles: 2022 Slovenian presidential election (talk · history · tag) and Nataša Pirc Musar (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The independent Nataša Pirc Musar (pictured) wins the presidential elections in Slovenia, becoming its first female president (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The independent Nataša Pirc Musar (pictured) wins the presidential elections in Slovenia, becoming its first female president
News source(s): [26]
Credits:

Nominator's comments: There were more updaters and also the creator of the article of the Paradise Chronicle (talk) 20:06, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Correction. It seems I have updated the article 2022 Slovenian presidential elections as well as the lead of Natasa Pirc Musar with the info that she won. But anyway, important is the result. Doremo updated the infobox of the Natasa Pirc Musar article and Topjur01 created the Natasa Pirc Musar article.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 20:32, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Change of head of state, first female president, article is of sufficient quality. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 10:19, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 2022 Istanbul bombing

[edit]
Article: 2022 Istanbul bombing (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ At least six people are killed and 81 injured in a bombing on İstiklal Avenue in Istanbul, Turkey. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ ​
News source(s): BBC
Credits:

Nominator's comments: This is a tragic event in one of the busiest and most visited cities in the world. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:12, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Expansion needed. Prodrummer619 (talk) 17:31, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support when expanded - Notable event, all over the news. ✨  4 🧚‍♂am KING  17:34, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support – as has been said, this is extremely notable and newsworthy. – BarleyButt (talk) 17:58, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support on notability, but Wait for expansion MyriadSims (talk) 22:09, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support - notable event, this event is all over the news. Editor 5426387 (talk) 13:46, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wait Of course notable event, but news are still coming in.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 18:12, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support - A current event with ongoing developments, also due to general bandwidth shrinking for social media in Turkey, this might prove helpful to acquire news on the event. Mavromatis (talk) 20:32, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't add the WL on Turkey in the blurb, it could deviate the attention on the bombing a bit.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:30, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Concur. Curbon7 (talk) 03:50, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that a wikilink to Turkey is not needed. That being said, I don't see the harm in it and I don't think it will substantially detract from the bold bombing's relative prominence. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:05, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 2022 ICC Men's T20 World Cup

[edit]
Article: 2022 ICC Men's T20 World Cup (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: England wins the ICC Men's T20 World Cup, beating Pakistan at the Melbourne Cricket Ground. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ ​In cricket, England defeat Pakistan in the final of the ICC Men's T20 World Cup.
Alternative blurb II: ​ In cricket, the ICC Men's T20 World Cup concludes with England defeating Pakistan in the final.
News source(s): [27][28]
Credits:

Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: ITN/R, large event in the sport. Posted before in 2016, 2014, 2010 (and possibly more but I haven't checked). Still requires updating as it only just happened. echidnaLives - talk - edits 11:44, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 12

[edit]

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

Politics and elections

Sports

(Posted) RD:John Connaughton

[edit]
Article: John Connaughton (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Port Vale FC Stoke Sentinel
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: English footballer. Couple of achievements need citing. Not overly familiar with football RS but will take a look - Dumelow (talk) 16:11, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Carroll Hubbard

[edit]
Article: Carroll Hubbard (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Louisville Courier Journal
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American politician convicted for campaign finance violations. I've expanded it a little based on the above obituary - Dumelow (talk) 10:47, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Curbon7, I added that content (with a cite to the Courier Journal) but the citation was lost in later edits by others. Now readded - Dumelow (talk) 10:56, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Issues resolved. Curbon7 (talk) 12:10, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) 2022 United States elections

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Articles: 2022 United States Senate elections (talk · history · tag) and 2022 United States House of Representatives elections (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In the United States, the Democratic Party retains their majority in the Senate. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In the United States, the Democratic Party retains their majorities in the Senate and in the House of Representatives.
Alternative blurb II: ​ In the United States, the Democratic Party retains their majority in the Senate, while the Republican Party wins control of the House of Representatives.
Alternative blurb III: ​ In the United States, the Democratic Party retains their majority in the Senate, while the House elections remain too close to call.
News source(s): NBC News, CNN, AP
Credits:

Article updated
One or both nominated events are listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.
Nominator's comments: Finally. The Senate has been called for Democrats; should we wait for the House? Davey2116 (talk) 02:27, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I do think senate control was the big picture here, but I would at least wait a half day from now to see if the house direction looks any closer. Masem (t) 02:30, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's not a matter of counting. The deadline for mail-in votes to be received is in the future in some places. GreatCaesarsGhost 14:30, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Failed to follow WP:NPOV in your blurb
  2. Used a non-news source
  3. Said something false (there was no blue wave, there was just the lack of a red wave)
Tube·of·Light 03:23, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There was a blue wave tho, dems gained seats in the senate and will win the house as well, trump is finished 2600:100F:B100:1F76:5906:EF2A:8D24:297C (talk) 03:27, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
this is not the place for this kind of stuff so stop. _-_Alsor (talk) 03:29, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Donald J Trump was not standing in this election, and the existence of any sort of 'wave' is a matter for political punditry, not Wikipedia headlines. GenevieveDEon (talk) 20:29, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait till both houses are called (If Nevada goes to the GOP, then just add that the senate is undecided as Georgia will have a run-off election). Tube·of·Light 03:23, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support The default assumption was that the House will go to the GOP and that the Dems were the slight favorite to retain the Senate, but the Senate could go either way. That the Dems retain control of the Senate is then nontrivial news. But the House going to the GOP is a foregone conclusion (probability of this not happening is not zero but it is extremely small), we should not wait for that to become official. Count Iblis (talk) 03:33, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A)The GOP was the favorite to win the Senate, B) the House going to the GOP was not a foregone conclusion before the election or even today, C) The Dem chances in the House are way over zero (betting markets say about 20%), & D) no one is talking about waiting for it to be official, we follow reliable sources, who have not called the house. GreatCaesarsGhost 14:30, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A GOP House would likely impeach Biden regardless of Senate control. 331dot (talk) 07:03, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Any talk of impeachment is pure crystal balls. GenevieveDEon (talk) 20:29, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
On what grounds? Cheers. WimePocy 01:15, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Post. The House has not been called and is not a foregone conclusion, the Democrats have a narrow but realistic path to retaining the majority. There is no reason to wait for the House to be called(which may not be soon due to recounts) in order to post the Senate. 331dot (talk) 07:02, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support posting Senate control of the House will probably come down to California, which notoriously takes weeks to count all of its ballots. Preferably we post the Senate now and update the blurb when the House is decided. YD407OTZ (talk) 10:12, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait until we have official results as we've had enough of wishful thinking and misrepresentation. And we're an encyclopedia not news media and so there's no rush. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:33, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
We have never waited for official results/certifications/inaugurations/formalities. We follow the news. If you don't think the news should be in the business of reporting unofficial election results, take that up with them, not us. 331dot (talk) 11:55, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm also very curious as to what is being "misrepresented" here. This is In the news, not "list of official events and happenings"331dot (talk) 11:59, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Why? It may not be for awhile, and at that point it will be said posting the Senate is stale. We can always add the House later. 331dot (talk) 16:32, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Another thing I noticed was that the Democrats have less seats than the Republicans – just 48 to 49. It seems that the balance is held by two Independents – Angus King and Bernie Sanders. Elsewhere, this would be called a coalition or hung parliament. This doesn't seem to be strong control by any party as, when it's so close, any Senator can cause trouble for such close votes. So blurbing a Democratic majority seems incorrect when you need 51 for a majority and they only have 48. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:05, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
King and Sanders caucus with the Democrats; a UK comparison would be the relationship between Labour and the Co-ops, basically one and the same. Curbon7 (talk) 09:24, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just to add on to that, because the Vice President is a Democrat, she can serve as a tie breaker in the case of 50-50 votes. So, for all practical purposes, the Democrats control the Senate. YD407OTZ (talk) 09:29, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sanders & King are essentially independents in name only. They caucus w/the Democrats & usually vote the same way as the Democrats. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 09:32, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • The caucus mechanism seems mainly to do with allocation of seats on committees. But when it comes to party allegiance and voting, someone like Angus King seems to be his own man – "neither a Democrat nor a Republican, but an American". According to Angus_King#Political_positions, "King voted with the Democratic Party 43% of the time", which doesn't sound like consistent, dependable support. As he rejects the party label, we should not be pinning one on him. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:40, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Consider that nearly all RSes reporting on the results have stated that the Dems kept control of the Senate. You could argue that they are wrongly categorized, but between what RS say and what we know King and Sanders have done, this is a fact. Masem (t) 13:14, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
While I’m neutral WRT whether or not the Senate results should be posted now or when the House results are known, I oppose the 1st 2 alt blurbs. We shouldn’t be a crystal ball. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 09:36, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Post House Now the AP have determined that the house has won the majority. Aaron Liu (talk) 00:24, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) Dallas airshow mid-air collision

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: 2022 Dallas airshow mid-air collision (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ A Bell P-63 Kingcobra and a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress (picturedcollide mid-air at a Dallas airshow killing six. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Six people are killed in a mid-air plane crash at an air show in Dallas.
News source(s): NYTABC News, CBS
Credits:

Nominator's comments:   There are not that many air worthy B17's left its being reported on by notable news agencies. No offical death toll yet. Koltinn (talk) 23:05, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose (FWIW I've seen 6 tossed around as a number for death toll). An unfortunate incident and while highly published, not really the type of disaster we cover. --Masem (t) 23:08, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Masem MyriadSims (talk) 02:40, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - per Masem PrecariousWorlds (talk) 12:17, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lots of coverage, this type of collision is uncommon given the nature of both of these aircraft. Editor 5426387 (talk) 02:25, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Mehran Karimi Nasseri

[edit]
Article: Mehran Karimi Nasseri (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): AP
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: The Iranian traveller that had been living in CdG airport for 18 years that inspired "The Terminal". One CN that I see. Masem (t) 21:10, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Women's Rugby Union World Cup

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: 2021 Rugby World Cup Final (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In rugby union football, New Zealand (captain and player of the match Ruahei Demant pictured) defeat England in the final of the 2021 Rugby World Cup. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In rugby union, New Zealand (captain and player of the match Ruahei Demant pictured) defeat England in the final of the 2021 Rugby World Cup.
News source(s): BBC
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Complete article on the final. Presuming we link the final rather than tournament. And yes, the 2021 World Cup. Kingsif (talk) 09:13, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Did we blurb the cup in 2017? PrecariousWorlds (talk) 10:16, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@PrecariousWorlds: Yes :) Kingsif (talk) 11:37, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Then Support PrecariousWorlds (talk) 13:49, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wait no actual prose about the game other than in the lead (which needs to reflect the article content). Thus not yet been updated enough as per WP:ITNCRIT. Comment by James Lewis Bedford (talk) 13:23, 12 November 2022 (UTC) – Wait strikethrough and now support as per issues addressed by Kinkgsif below. Edit by James Lewis Bedford (talk) 06:04, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose on quality Background section does not cite any sources XxLuckyCxX (talk) 21:41, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Now added references. Kingsif (talk) 23:48, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Andrew Davidson: Well I never said it was ITNR, just that it was posted last time, and I know you know that it's wrong to oppose something just because it isn't ITN/R (aka most things) rather than evaluate its own merits. Kingsif (talk) 12:48, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It was marked as ITN/R, which I recognised from the green tint. Kingsif has since changed it. Andrew🐉(talk) 13:22, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't appreciate the implication of that comment; as said, I never marked it ITN/R. You have also not expanded on whether you think only ITN/R items can possibly get posted, with an unexplained !oppose. Kingsif (talk) 13:33, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 11

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Politics and elections


RD: John Aniston

[edit]
Article: John Aniston (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CNN
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Greek-American actor. - Indefensible (talk) 16:39, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support Death just announced today. Article is sufficiently sourced. Star Mississippi 22:53, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Sir Ian Barker

[edit]
Article: Ian Barker (jurist) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Chief Justice of New Zealand tribute
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: New Zealand High Court judge. I've expanded from the source I've linked above - Dumelow (talk) 12:37, 14 November 2022 (UTC) Dumelow (talk) 12:37, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Keith Levene

[edit]
Article: Keith Levene (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Founding member of The Clash and Public Image LtdThriley (talk) 23:20, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Rajni Kumar

[edit]
Article: Rajni Kumar (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Hindustan Times
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Indian educator. Ktin (talk) 16:41, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Sven-Bertil Taube

[edit]
Article: Sven-Bertil Taube (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [30]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 BabbaQ (talk) 10:26, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support One of Sweden's most notable artists from an equally notable artist family. Article is in nice shape thanks to BabbaQ. cart-Talk 14:18, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: "During the 1980s and 1990s, Taube starred in a number of Swedish films and television series, while keeping his music career alive." could do with a citation; the filmography includes only three entries for those two decades, one of which is British, so does not support the claim. Thryduulf (talk) 16:15, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:33, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Films added and claim reinstated. cart-Talk 18:49, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
+Support. No outstanding issues I can see. Thryduulf (talk) 21:29, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Gallagher

[edit]
Article: Gallagher (comedian) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CNN, Yahoo!
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Prop and observational comedian, best known for his watermelon-smashing routine and many popular specials in the 1980s. CoatCheck (talk) 17:51, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Kevin Conroy

[edit]
Article: Kevin Conroy (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [31]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 – Muboshgu (talk) 16:36, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) FTX bankruptcy

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: FTX (company) (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: FTX, one of the world's largest cryptocurrency exchanges, files for bankruptcy. (Post)
News source(s): Wall Street Journal
Credits:
Nominator's comments: I tend to take a restrained approach to posting business news, but this looks to be legitimately a huge deal. Front page news globally amid a rout in crypto markets. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support It's been, on and off, the top story on FT, Bloomberg, and the WSJ for days. — Mainly 17:06, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Bankruptcy is one of those ways that companies regularly get out of a bad financial situation. This is standard business news, and given the finicky nature of cryptocurrency on WP, we should be very wary of this stuff. --Masem (t) 17:54, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. If Microsoft or Apple or Lockheed Martin went bankrupt I'm fairly sure those would be posted. Crypto is an area of strong interest, so much so that editing about it is under sanctions. 331dot (talk) 18:03, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy is not the end of a company or the like, though it does imply it is in financial trouble. It's like an athlete stating they are retiring, something that can always be undone. Masem (t) 18:07, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    And I think we should post notable retirements too. Something should not need to be written in stone or otherwise irreversible to be posted. 331dot (talk) 18:23, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    FTX is not a company on the level of Microsoft, Apple, or Lockheed Martin. DarkSide830 (talk) 03:25, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    While I'm not familiar with crypto, from what I read, this was a very important company in that world. 331dot (talk) 09:49, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose bankruptcies aren't really ITN material in my opinion. FTXs value was overinflated in the first place. Moreover, it seems like we don't really post bankruptcies. Previously nominated were: Sri Lanka in July 2022, Whiting Petrolium in April 2020, Thomas Cook and Purdue Pharma in September 2019, PG&E in January 2019, Sears in October 2018, Gibson in May 2018, Toys R Us in March 2018. None of those were posted. And in the end, Sri Lanka, Whiting Petrolium (merged with Chord Energy), PG&E, Sears, Gibson, and Toys R Us successfully exited bankruptcy and continue to do business. YD407OTZ (talk) 22:03, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
YD407OTZ Well, we don't post something until we do. Consensus can change. If it doesn't, fair enough, but we have to start somewhere. 331dot (talk) 21:42, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I cannot find in the ITN criteria where it says "earth shattering importance" is required. 331dot (talk) 00:13, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning oppose - I can see both sides on this, but, per Masem, I don't think this is notable enough for ITn PrecariousWorlds (talk) 09:38, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Although not a bank like the Lehman brothers and causing a crash to the USD, FTX was the second largest crypto exchange, and its bankruptcy of over $16billion and has had a profound effect on the entire crypto market. The recent crypto crash is a result of this and something of this caliber is likely to receive a response from the SEC on regulation. I think the shock-factor with this bankruptcy is that this company was levering funds it didn't have and that those involved in the crypto community did not think a crypto organisation of this size would become insolvent like this. GR86 (📱) 21:30, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Closed) Recapture of Kherson

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2022 Ukrainian southern counteroffensive (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Ukraine recaptures the city of Kherson from Russian forces following their retreat. (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:
Nominator's comments: I do not believe every step of the war should be posted as a blurb, but the recapture of the only regional capital to fall in this conflict seems a notable step. 331dot (talk) 16:02, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This highlights a different article than Ongoing, which is about the broader conflict. 331dot (talk) 16:36, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not exactly a reliable source, but if something actually comes of this, I might support a blurb. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:24, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Like nom, I don't support blurbing every progress update of the war, but this does have special geopolitical significance as Kherson was the only regional capital captured by Russian forces at any point. The Kip (talk) 16:47, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose See ongoing, It's not unexpected or unusual for territory to change hands in wars. We didnt blurb other victories/ends of battles like the fall of Mariupol either. The end of a battle dont merit a burb, the end of the war probably would. The war stories that we did blurb were blurbed for reasons that reflect a particular significance of an event in a historical context. (bucha warcrimes, and the Moskva being the worst loss the Russian Navy has suffered since WWII) ✨  4 🧚‍♂am KING  17:08, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is historically significant, the recapture of the only captured regional capital. I haven't understood the general resistance to posting things here that's developed in recent years. What are we afraid of? 331dot (talk) 18:00, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Donetsk and Luhansk city say hi. It's not the only captured regional capital under Russian control, even if not recently captured. In terms of significance, I would argue the defeat in Kharkiv and retreat of Kyiv are just as significant; as was the fall of Mariupol being Ukraine's last holdout on the Sea of Azov but we didn't blurb those, since at the core they just represent conclusions of smaller battles in a bigger war which is covered in ongoing; Kherson isn't even fully liberated since most of the land of the Oblast is on the other side of the Dnieper. ✨  4 🧚‍♂am KING  18:52, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
4iamking You'll want to tell the BBC that, that's where I got that claim, and it's in their headline right now. 331dot (talk) 19:04, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
BBC's headline can be whatever, 1 source doesn't dictate reality necessarily. BBC's headline has the caveat "since the war began" which is more accurate, But it certainly isn't the only controlled territorial capital. Even Sievierodonetsk which was the de-facto Ukrainian capital of Luhansk before the war is captured. Im not denying that its a major victory for 1 waring party and a defeat for the other, but there are lots of those occurrences in this war, and they need not all be blurbed, since thats why it is in ongoing; else we'd be doing in on a monthly basis. ✨  4 🧚‍♂am KING  19:12, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The BBC says "Today was a hugely consequential moment in a war now in its ninth month". So if it's not a key event, they need to fire their journalists and start over. 331dot (talk) 19:06, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Significant Development, the retaking of an regional capital in an area occupied for over 8 months would be major news. Editor 5426387 (talk) 03:44, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Support biggest victory since Kiev. We posted the fall of a bridge, this is a far bigger event.
𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 ☎️ 📄 04:12, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Russia occupies Crimea, and Ukraine has long stated its intentions to both reclaim it and destroy the bridge. 331dot (talk) 09:47, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also there was long series of destroyed military targets in Crimea long before Kerch Bridge explosion. So arguing there "wasn't war in Crimea" seams like uninformed opinion to me.--Jenda H. (talk) 16:06, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning Support - Pretty split on this one, but we posted the Crimean Bridge explosion, and this is a much larger development in the war, possibly the largest in the last 6 months. Could have big consequences. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 09:40, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) RD: Wolf Schneider

[edit]
Article: Wolf Schneider (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Süddeutsche Zeitung
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: German journalist, author and language critic Grimes2 (talk) 12:06, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Siddhaanth Vir Surryavanshi

[edit]
Article: Siddhaanth Vir Surryavanshi (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [32] [33] [34]
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Indian television actor ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 11:08, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 10

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Science and technology


(Closed) 2022 Nepal earthquake

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2022 Nepal earthquake (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: A 5.7 magnitude earthquake strikes Nepal, leaving at least six people dead. (Post)
Credits:
Nominator's comments: The earthquake was widely felt in western Nepal and northern India. बडा काजी (talk) 22:53, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Small scale both in terms of death toll and literal scale. MyriadSims (talk) 02:37, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per above Editor 5426387 (talk) 03:47, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - per above PrecariousWorlds (talk) 12:07, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Withdrawn) Ongoing removal: Mahsa Amini protests

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Mahsa Amini protests (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item removal (Post)
Nominator's comments: No major protests in the past week. No fresh updates to the articleRAN1 (talk) 18:40, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose No major protests doesn't mean there aren't protests. The name is just 'Mahsa Amini protests', and doesn't specify major protests. And besides, the article itself states that they are "an ongoing series of protests" MyriadSims (talk) 20:38, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@MyriadSims: They're ongoing, but they're not in the news anymore. I've seen more coverage of the hypersonic missile claim. RAN1 (talk) 05:04, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

November 9

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents


(Posted) RD: Werner Schulz

[edit]
Article: Werner Schulz (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): TAG24
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: German politician of the Greens, active in the Peaceful Revolution, later member of parliament (CEO of his party there) and European parliament. He collapsed at the president's office at a memorial event where he was siüüpsed to speak. The article isn't yet where I want it, but I'm busy today, - please check and help. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:51, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Operation Barkhane

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Operation Barkhane (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ France ends its military operation against Islamist insurgents in the Sahel. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ France ends Operation Barkhane against Islamist insurgents in the Sahel.
News source(s): BBC AfricaNews
Credits:
Nominator's comments: All troops withdrawn from Mali. Several troops are left in neighboring countries but are awaiting for their roles to be reassigned. Decade-long military intervention that's now over. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ) 14:56, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Significant geopolitical event. The citation for the withdrawal used the deprecated parenthetical format, but I've reformatted it. There are some proseline issues, but not enough to disqualify it. POV issues should also be looked into (as is often the case, the criticism section presents serious POV concerns). I prefer the first blurb. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 16:14, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • If this is now past tense the article needs a few edits to achieve this. Also the infobox has quite a bit of bloat - for instance Charles III is listed under "commanders and leaders" which is a case of "technically I see what you are doing but in reality it looks silly". --LukeSurl t c 16:38, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Article could use a little more information about the end of this operation. The sentence just prior to the one announcing the end of the operation in the article seems to suggest that there are still French troops there, and that the operation is being reformulated, so this could use a little more clarification. SpencerT•C 01:48, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment article missing aftermath/conclusion and it is unclear what they did. Shadow4dark (talk) 10:40, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support - per Thebiguglyalien PrecariousWorlds (talk) 10:59, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Seems to be mostly a regrouping: "Around 3,000 French soldiers remain in Burkina Faso, Chad and Niger. There are no immediate plans for a reduction in numbers." The insurgencies in the Sahel and Mahgreb continue. Andrew🐉(talk) 11:08, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Significant geopolitical event, indeed. Definitely for ITN.BabbaQ (talk) 22:59, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Interesting, well sourced, informative. Jusdafax (talk) 11:06, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. This is a significant geopolitical event that substantially impacts the security situation in the Sahel. This warrants inclusion at ITN. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:33, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I see this marked as "ready" but not seeing the level of expansion for this to be ready IMO. I did leave a comment above stating that more clarification is needed, so will leave to another admin to assess. At present, all the article has for the past 3 months is: French forces completed their withdrawal from Mali on 15 August.[13] The French military stated that 3,000 troops will remain in the Sahel region as part of Operation Barkhane and added that it was not ending, but being reformulated.[14] However on November 9, Macron announced the end of Operation Barkhane and stated that some French troops will remain in the region under new arrangements. More clarification is needed regarding what "new arrangements" actually means. SpencerT•C 02:34, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) RD: Hans-Joachim Klein

[edit]
Article: Hans-Joachim Klein (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Ouest France
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: German militant, associate of Carlos the JackalDumelow (talk) 14:20, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Bao Tong

[edit]
Article: Bao Tong (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC News
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: "The most senior Communist Party official imprisoned over the Tiananmen protests" KTC (talk) 12:04, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Kirill Stremousov

[edit]
Article: Kirill Stremousov (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Head of the Russian-occupied Kherson government - allegedly died in a car crash hours before Russia's retreat — Chevvin 16:53, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Gal Costa

[edit]
Article: Gal Costa (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Morre Gal Costa, uma das maiores vozes da música brasileira, aos 77 anos
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Brazilian singer of popular music 4me689 (talk) 15:31, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 8

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sports


(Posted) RD: Bill Treacher

[edit]
Article: Bill Treacher (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [36]
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Arthur Fowler in EastEnders. Announced today. Stephen 20:28, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Tom Owen

[edit]
Article: Tom Owen (actor) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC News, The Guardian
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: One of the last of the Last of the Summer Wine. Played Compo Simmonite's son after the death of his real life father Bill Owen, among other credits. Death announced this date. CoatCheck (talk) 19:25, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Leslie Phillips

[edit]
Article: Leslie Phillips (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [37] [38]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: British actor, died yesterday but first reported today. The article starts off well but needs a lot of work on sourcing after that. Thryduulf (talk) 13:46, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Roger Bhatnagar

[edit]
Article: Roger Bhatnagar (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Indian News Link
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Indian-born New Zealand businessman. Quite short, I've added a little from the above source. More expansion might be possible once obits are published - Dumelow (talk) 09:45, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 7

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations


(Posted) RD: Juan Pizarro Navarrete

[edit]
Article: Juan Pizarro Navarrete (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Ideal Europa Press
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Spanish politician. Curbon7 (talk) 23:53, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Ongoing: 2022 United States elections

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2022 United States elections (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
News source(s): NBC
Credits:

The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.
Nominator's comments: Starting at 12:00 UTC (07:00 EST), this should be posted to ongoing since this is a high-stakes election. Once the results have been published, then it should be blurbed. Interstellarity (talk) 23:34, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

RD: Edward C. Prescott

[edit]
Article: Edward C. Prescott (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CLA
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Nobel Prize winner 4me689 (talk) 20:10, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Ongoing:COP27

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2022 United Nations Climate Change Conference (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC News CNBC The Guardian
Credits:
 Quantum XYZ (chat) 12:37, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ongoing, support blurb - Notable event, but not enough for ongoing. Might want to wait before the conference is over too PrecariousWorlds (talk) 16:04, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Ongoing, support blurb - not suitable for ongoing, but I think the start of the conference is sufficient for a blurb. We can always update/repost if there is a significant outcome 2A02:C7F:2CE3:4700:D5E4:A424:6F4C:88DF (talk) 18:03, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose There are a lot of these summits, lots of big promises are made, photos are taken, handshakes exchanged. None of it ever materialises into anything of note; then everyone takes their private jet back home, adding not reducing the carbon footprint globally. I cannot see how this is any more notable than any other routine political event or summit, which happen all the time, regularly. Abcmaxx (talk) 18:02, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose ongoing, wait to consider a blurb. Let's see if the negotiators can come up with a substantive agreement, beyond the usual waffle about good intentions and some insufficient national pledges. Modest Genius talk 19:40, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose and close. We can consider a blurb as and when the conference closes, but certainly not for the opening, and it's also not the sort of major frequently updated story that we put in ongoing.  — Amakuru (talk) 23:54, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

November 6

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Law and crime

Sports


(Posted) RD: Jake Crouthamel

[edit]
Article: Jake Crouthamel (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Syracuse.com
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:39, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Michael Boyce, Baron Boyce

[edit]
Article: Michael Boyce, Baron Boyce (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Telegraph
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Royal Navy admiral and member of the House of Lords Dumelow (talk) 09:33, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Fuel blockade in Haiti ended amid crisis

[edit]
Article: 2022 Haitian crisis (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Amid a socioeconomic and political crisis in Haiti, a coalition of armed gangs relinquishes control of the country's largest fuel terminal. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Amid a crisis in Haiti marked by fuel shortages, a coalition of armed gangs relinquishes control of the country's largest fuel terminal.
Alternative blurb II: ​ Amid a socioeconomic and political crisis in Haiti, gang leader Jimmy Chérizier announces the end to a blockade of the country's largest fuel terminal.
News source(s): ABC News, Agence France-Presse, Al-Jazeera, BBC News, CNN, Miami Herald, Reuters [1] and [2]
Credits:

 —Matthew - (talk) 00:41, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: It's unclear whether the blockade has actually ended or if this is just an announcement. If the situation is resolved, then I definitely support. If this is just an announcement, then I say wait until something changes on the ground. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 01:15, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Thebiguglyalien: According to the CNN article linked above, "Haiti National Police spokesperson Gary Desrosiers also confirmed that the Varreux terminal is now under police control. The terminal, located in southwest Port-au-Prince, supplies most of the oil in Haiti. It has been blocked by G9 gang members for the past six weeks, choking off access to fuel in the country. G9 abandoned Varreux terminal over the weekend, one high-level security source told CNN." Reuters and BBC News also report that Haitian police have taken control of the terminal, with the former making note of drone images that appear to show that access to the terminal's entrance is now clear. —Matthew - (talk) 09:14, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Additional update: Agence France-Presse reported earlier today that fuel distribution in Haiti has resumed. —Matthew - (talk) 02:06, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Additional additional update: the Associated Press has reported that gas stations have reopened. —Matthew - (talk) 04:06, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support It seems like the blockade has ended, which is a significant development. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 08:05, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Peter McNab

[edit]
Article: Peter McNab (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NHL, ESPN
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Former ice hockey player and longtime Colorado Avalanche broadcaster. Article needs citation work. The Kip (talk) 18:21, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 NASCAR Cup Series

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: 2022 NASCAR Cup Series (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In US stock car racing, Joey Logano (pictured) wins the NASCAR Cup Series championship. (Post)
News source(s): NASCAR
Credits:

The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Well, after Logano wins at Phoenix (even though everybody wanted Chastain to win, myself included), he's the Cup champion.. TheBlueSkyClub (talk) 1:28, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

(Closed) 2022 Azadi March-II

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2022 Azadi March-II (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
Credits:
Nominator's comments: Add 2022 Azadi March-II to ongoing. This is a 'political revolution' in Pakistan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ImprovetheArabicUnicode (talk contribs) 16:09, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) Precision Air Flight 494

[edit]

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted) 2022 MotoGP World Championship

[edit]

Template:ITN candidate

Support – article has been updated and there are no quality concerns. Should be ready to go. Comment by James Lewis Bedford (talk) 17:11, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) World Series

[edit]

Template:ITN candidate

(Closed) MLS Cup

[edit]

Template:Atop Template:ITN candidate

Regardless, the quality is far below the big European domestic leagues and is similar in quality to second-tier competitions in the big European countries. It would be worse quality than the medium-level European leagues eg France, Russia, Netherlands and Portugal also Bumbubookworm (talk) 21:52, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Article looks good. Match summary which is often the missing piece in many of these sporting events is also present. Tournament meets threshold expectations for homepage. Good to go. Ktin (talk) 16:54, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. The following should be probably be clarified for North American editors (which is the major reason why it fails to regularly gain consensus on either ITN or ITNR): Unlike the "big four" major professional sports leagues in the United States and Canada, MLS is not the world's top men's professional league in its sport like the NFL (for American football), MLB (for baseball), NBA (for basketball) and NHL (for ice hockey) are. MLS falls below Premier League, La Liga, and Bundesliga in terms of featuring the world's top association football players. ITN should not post every single domestic association football league around the world. Zzyzx11 (talk) 17:17, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Far below! Bumbubookworm (talk) 21:52, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – For a specific year's sporting competition that is not an ITN/R, I would need to see something unique about that particular edition that makes it considerably notable in comparison to prior years. I don't see that here. Comment by James Lewis Bedford (talk) 17:50, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Abot

November 5

[edit]

Template:Cot Portal:Current events/2022 November 5 Template:Cob


RD: Coy Gibbs

[edit]

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted) RD: Luis Alegre Salazar

[edit]

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted) RD: Aaron Carter

[edit]

Template:ITN candidate

Wait As above, some CN tags that need fixing but happy to approve once sorted XxLuckyCxX (talk) 00:43, 6 November 2022 (UTC) Support Everything looks good to go now XxLuckyCxX (talk) 00:38, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ouch, right in the childhood. I've fixed up several citation needed tags. There are 3 left, confined to the Tours section. Support otherwise. - Floydian τ ¢ 05:38, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wait, then support: Still a couple citations that need fixing up but once that's done post it. PolarManne (talk) 06:14, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Karmenu Mifsud Bonnici

[edit]

Template:ITN candidate Oppose for now - I saw two cn tags and a number of other unsourced claims. I think we blurbed Angola's former president when he died, so why not Malta? Quantum XYZ (chat) 16:14, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blurbing is a little more complicated than that. It's not a case of Angola vs Malta. And just being a head of state/government, etc. may not be enough. Please feel free to propose a blurb and make your case. However, the wikibio ought to have the pertinent contents to back up the case. I hope I am not being disrespectful to the dead, but looking at the single-line intro of this wikibio, I'm not sure we have a blurb-able candidate here. --PFHLai (talk) 16:32, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Got it, thanks. Quantum XYZ (chat) 10:49, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Russian café fire

[edit]

Template:Atop Template:ITN candidate

Oppose - A tragedy, but I don't think it is notable enough for ITN PrecariousWorlds (talk) 17:57, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Abot

November 4

[edit]

Template:Cot Portal:Current events/2022 November 4 Template:Cob


(Posted) RD: Bambang Subianto

[edit]

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted) RD: Igor Sypniewski

[edit]

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted) RD: Balakh Sher Mazari

[edit]

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted) RD: Dave Butz

[edit]

Template:ITN candidate

November 3

[edit]

Template:Cot Portal:Current events/2022 November 3 Template:Cob


(Closed) Chagos Archipelago negotiations

[edit]

Template:Atop Template:ITN candidate

Oppose - Per mellohi PrecariousWorlds (talk) 10:07, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose wait until further development Editor 5426387 (talk) 12:57, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Abot

(Posted) RD: Ray Guy

[edit]

Template:ITN candidate

Ok so, it seems that BeanieFan11 has essentially cited the entire article so I believe that it is ok for Recent Death now. Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:34, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Attempted assassination of Imran Khan

[edit]

Template:ITN candidate

Weak Support - Not exactly sure if an assassination attempt can be ITN but the article looks good enough for it. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:17, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support - High quality article, major event in Pakistan. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 17:35, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Someone attempted to assassinate a former prime minister and famous cricketer. If it gets put on ITN, I would prefer the second alternative to be the blurb. Djprasadian (talk) 18:45, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What variant of English refers to a shooting as a "firing"? – Muboshgu (talk) 18:57, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think by 'second alternative' he means alt2. Quantum XYZ (talk) 11:59, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Interest rate rises

[edit]

Template:ITN candidate

  • Oppose blurb but support ongoing for the inflation surge as a global story when the article is improved. Central banks started increasing interest rates earlier this year, but it's now that they reach the historical highs over the past 15 years. I don't think this is worth posting given that they've already announced further increases in the period to come. As an economist, I'd like to see more economic news in ITN, but the main problem is that the articles documenting economic stories are not in a format to receive regular updates. However, the inflation surge is a perfect example for a developing economic story affecting the whole world that should be posted onto ongoing.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:19, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose on quality an article about "worldwide" inflation surge that mainly talks about inflation in the United States is an insult to intelligence. Andrew's idea of nominating it for Ongoing does not displease me. _-_Alsor (talk) 14:28, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support for Ongoing Article is not as imbalanced as the above user pretends it to be. It has sizable sections discussing impacts in many regions of the world. It isn't perfect, but the coverage is broad enough to avoid the sort of bias that Alsor says (incorrectly) that exists. Certainly, more improvement is invited, but it passes the minimum quality standards for the main page. Otherwise, it meets all of the requirements for ongoing. 1) it lacks a single blurbable headline 2) it is a longer term item that doesn't fit neatly into the standard ITN cycle timeframe and 3) It is receiving frequent, timely, and relevant updates. Seems like a perfect ongoing target. --Jayron32 14:36, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    How is it not unbalanced? More than half of the article is about the United States. How can it not be unbalanced if there's only one section (as if it were "something extra") talking about the regional impact and only a few lines in the first three sections narrating very briefly the situation in the Eurozone, Saudi Arabia or Germany? _-_Alsor (talk) 15:47, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ongoing Is the way to go with this since this has been happening for a while. NoahTalk 14:47, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I do think this would make an interesting story for Ongoing, but isn't suitable for a blurb. However the article is heavily slanted towards the US - almost all the background section discusses events there, with other countries mentioned only as afterthoughts. Other parts of it haven't been updated with the latest news e.g. the UK interest rate rise. These are certainly fixable problems, but the article needs work before being postable. Modest Genius talk 14:54, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If we do post this as ongoing, at what point might it be removed? This could turn out to be the 'new normal', persisting for years. Modest Genius talk 15:18, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
When the inevitable recession is announced after Q4 earnings are posted mid-January? - Floydian τ ¢ 15:33, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That's very country-specific. Some economies are already in recession, while others are unlikely to enter one. Modest Genius talk 12:12, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose both blurb and ongoing like hurricane seasons, market changes are very difficult stories for ITN to cover as there is no clear start or end. Banks moving to shift interest rates is a sign of recession, but there is no clear point where this will become dire. I would also agree this is more a US issue and less global; it is not like past country money collapses. --Masem (t) 15:02, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Blurb either doesn't seem to be covered in the article, or it is largely stale, as the article doesn't mention interest rises in October or November this year. That being said, the article does look like it's actively being updated (October and November are frequently mentioned), so it is appropriate for Ongoing. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 15:15, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose both blurb and ongoing per Masem particularly on account of the undefined nature of the issue. Also not a blurbable event, IMO, because the subject has no article and the blurb regards several separate events. Just too amorphous a situation to be ITN IMO. DarkSide830 (talk) 16:02, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This event has been ongoing for a while, not really "news" if it's been happening for the last year, would it? Editor 5426387 (talk) 16:13, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose blurb but Support Ongoing - I don't feel that this should be a blurb but ongoing does seem reasonable. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:19, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose blurb and ongoing - This shouldn't be ongoing for the same reason Climate Change and COVID-19 aren't ongoing. We've had this discussion before. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 17:38, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This topic is simply too broad PrecariousWorlds (talk) 10:05, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait until the issues in the article have been addressed (specifically in the first section). Once that is addressed, I would vote support to put this in the ongoing section but oppose the blurb. This is not blurb-worthy but notable enough to be considered as an ongoing event. While the inflation surge began last year, it looks like it only reached its peak this year and it is only now that the world economies are experiencing the full brunt of the surge. Vida0007 (talk) 19:49, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support ongoing - This is clearly an event with global consequences. Interstellarity (talk) 20:22, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support ongoing It's a large, global event and it definitely should be listed on ongoing. echidnaLives - talk - edits 23:34, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose ongoing Article not receiving regular, substantial updates to merit posting in the ongoing section. A close look at the article does not show substantial updates to the text with updates for October and November 2022. SpencerT•C 02:10, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Demonstrably not true; this has been updated in the past 5 days, much of which is relevant to data and events as late as the end of October. --Jayron32 13:15, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I'll be honest, looking at the diff comparison, I'm still not seeing substantial updates. There's a couple sentences here and there about individual rate hikes, without significant other depth/detail. Other additions such as 2 sentences about the rate of inflation in Africa describes inflation rates from August. The additions about Big Oil appear to cover information from June and July, with one sentence about US President Biden threatening companies in late October. To me, doesn't meet the threshold of regular updating needed for an Ongoing article, but I understand that others may feel differently. SpencerT•C 02:13, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - I wasn't sure how to link this event to article content. 2021–2022 inflation surge is the underlying issue, but the specific event would have to be something like Fall 2022 interest rate rises (which is never going to exist) or something like History of Federal Open Market Committee actions which is dull and country specific. Unless someone has a better idea? --LukeSurl t c 10:15, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think we need a separate article for the interest rates increase because the real developing story is the inflation surge around the world. If this gets posted onto ongoing, it will be the galloping inflation, not the rising interest rates (that's just a normal policy response during episodes of high inflation).--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:02, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ongoing, no comment on blurb - Small note to disclose I have made several edits to the 2021-2022 surge article, which seems to need continuous work. The outlook and forecast for global inflation is 8.8%, while previous relative peaks were 2008 with its US subprime crisis and 1994, another financial crisis. US Federal rate is also spiking, which is not normal. As a note to some other comments, inflation is not US-specific (although it is clearly responsible for global inflation), and the Eurozone is a massive land/population area. Asia is also seeing increased inflation though arguably to less alarming levels. The are crisis-ridden areas with extreme inflation but they are probably not part of the global inflation trend. Xenmorpha (talk) 12:17, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment In case this gets consensus for posting onto ongoing, which now seems very likely, it's important to note that the article has a long way to go in terms of quality. Firstly, the background section is incomplete and heavily focuses on events in the United States, yet the inflation surge is significantly more pronounced and the prospects are worse for Europe. This section would benefit from a clean-up and adding international context. Secondly, the section on the disagreement amongst economists regarding the nature of the inflation should go at the end of the article. Thirdly, the section on the impact of the invasion contains some dubious content. The sentence Template:Tq reflects an outdated belief and should be removed. Fourthly, the regional impacts section is incomplete, unbalanced and lacks a better structure. In the sub-section on Europe, the Netherlands and France are singled out for no reason. There's nothing about China and Japan even though the latter, which has been known as a low-inflation country, recorded its highest inflation for years. Fifthly, the article lacks a section summarising the policy responses across regions and countries. Policy rate increases by central banks and support packages by governments should go there. I know this is something that should end up on the article's talk page, but I deliberately post it here in order to prevent premature posting.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:34, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2

[edit]

Template:Cot Portal:Current events/2022 November 2 Template:Cob


(Attention needed) RD: Jakob Eng

[edit]

Template:ITN candidate

  • Comment. Reference 2 appears to be doing a lot of heavy lifting, apparently supporting almost the entirety of several long paragraphs. As it's in Norwegian I can't easily tell whether it does verify all of that information or not. Thryduulf (talk) 09:48, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak oppose Resume in prose format listing positions but without much depth about what his role/accomplishments were while in those positions. SpencerT•C 02:14, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Ronnie Radford

[edit]

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted) Tigray War

[edit]

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted) Israeli election

[edit]

Template:ITN candidate

Wait as per Nableezy Shadow4dark (talk) 07:47, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Andrey Titenko

[edit]

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted) RD: Erich Reich

[edit]

Template:ITN candidate

RD: Ela Bhatt

[edit]

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted) RD: Mauro Forghieri

[edit]

Template:ITN candidate

The death date. Unnamelessness (talk) 07:58, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the clarification and new footnote. --PFHLai (talk) 11:03, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Danish election

[edit]

Template:ITN candidate

Wait - Per Shadow4dark PrecariousWorlds (talk) 11:30, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wait new government, she resigned and want new government with both political spectrum parties and not just left. Shadow4dark (talk) 11:04, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 1

[edit]

Template:Cot Portal:Current events/2022 November 1 Template:Cob


(Posted) RD: Karl Svoboda (politician)

[edit]

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted) RD: George Booth (cartoonist)

[edit]

Template:ITN candidate

Template:Yo I have taken care of most of the citation issues. A few of his books do not have citation. Can the nomination go through without them? Thriley (talk) 17:23, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Max Maven

[edit]

Template:ITN candidate

RD: Gael Greene

[edit]

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted) RD: Julie Powell

[edit]

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted) RD: Takeoff (rapper)

[edit]

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted) RD: Filep Karma

[edit]

Template:ITN candidate